Search

Background: Neurocognitive impairment can be a debilitating complication after coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). Cardiopulmonary bypass, in particular, cerebral emboli, has been implicated. We compared neurocognitive function and cerebral emboli in patients undergoing on-pump and off-pump CABG. Methods: 212 patients admitted for CABG were randomly assigned to on-pump (n = 104) or off-pump (n = 108) surgery. Embolic signals were detected with bilateral transcranial Doppler ultrasonography of the middle cerebral artery. Neurocognitive tests were administered preoperatively, on discharge from hospital, at 6 weeks, and at 6 months after surgery. Composite neurocognitive scores were derived using principal component analysis and were compared between the two groups, using analysis of covariance to adjust for baseline values. Results: At discharge from hospital, the adjusted composite neurocognitive score was 0.25 standard deviations greater in the off-pump group compared with the on-pump group (95% confidence interval: 0.05 to 0.45; p = 0.01). There was no significant difference at 6 weeks (0.09 standard deviations, 95% confidence interval: −0.11 to +0.30; p = 0.4) and 6 months (−0.002 standard deviations, 95% confidence interval: −0.23 to +0.23; p = 1.0). Median number of embolic signals was 1,605 (751 to 2,473) during on-pump and 9 (4 to 27) in off-pump CABG (p < 0.001). Age, length of education, and on-pump status were independent predictors of the predischarge neurocognitive score (p = 0.02, 0.03, and 0.006, respectively). Conclusions: Cerebral emboli are more prevalent during on-pump CABG. At discharge from hospital, neurocognitive function is better after off-pump surgery, possibly as a result of the lower embolic load. However, the difference in neurocognitive function does not persist at 6 weeks and 6 months. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: The clinical benefit of off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery over on-pump surgery is a matter of controversy. The aim of this study was to assess quality of life in patients after on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and compare the data with an age-matched and sex-matched standard population. Methods: Two hundred twelve patients admitted for elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery were randomized to on-pump (n = 104) and off-pump (n = 108) surgery. Quality-of-life assessments were made 6 and 18 months postoperatively using the standard form of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36, version 2). The questionnaire yields eight subscores of functional health and well being. The eight SF-36 raw scores were standardized using means and standard deviations from a random sample of adults in Great Britain. Mean on-pump and off-pump SF-36 scores were compared using two-sample Student’s t tests. Results: Questionnaires were completed for 72% (154 of 212) and 46% (98 of 212) of patients at the 6- and 18-month follow-up, respectively. There were no significant differences between on-pump and off-pump patients in any of the eight subscales at both stages. Fifty-six (72%) on-pump and 59 (75%) off-pump patients reported a better health status compared with the 6-month period before surgery (not significant). Conclusions: Patients who have undergone off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery have a similar quality of life to on-pump patients at 6 and 18 months after surgery. For both groups, the majority of patients reported improved health after coronary artery bypass graft surgery compared with their preoperative status. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]