Search

Rationale: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and anxiety or depression experience more symptoms and exacerbations than patients without these comorbidities. Failure to provide beneficial COPD therapies to appropriate patients (underuse) and provision of potentially harmful therapies to patients without an appropriate indication (overuse) could contribute to respiratory symptoms and exacerbations. Anxiety and depression are known to affect the provision of health services for other comorbid conditions; therefore, underuse or overuse of therapies may explain the increased risk of severe symptoms among these patients. Objectives: To determine whether diagnosed anxiety and depression, as well as significant anxiety and depression symptoms, are associated with underuse and overuse of appropriate COPD therapies. Methods: We analyzed data from a multicenter prospective cohort study of 2,376 participants (smokers and control subjects) enrolled between 2010 and 2015. We identified two subgroups of participants, one at risk for inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) overuse and one at risk for long-acting bronchodilator (LABD) underuse based on the 2011 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease statement. Our primary outcomes were self-reported overuse and underuse. Our primary exposures of interest were self-reported anxiety and depression and significant anxiety and depression symptoms. We adopted a propensity-score method with inverse probability of treatment weighting adjusting for differences in prevalence of confounders and performed inverse probability of treatment weighting logistic regression to evaluate all associations between the exposures and outcomes. Results: Among the 1,783 study participants with COPD confirmed by spirometry, 667 (37.4%) did not have an indication for ICS use, whereas 985 (55.2%) had an indication for LABD use. Twenty-five percent (n = 167) of patients reported ICS use, and 72% (n = 709) denied LABD use in each subgroup, respectively. Neither self-reported anxiety and depression nor significant anxiety and depression symptoms were associated with overuse or underuse. At least 50% of patients in both subgroups with significant symptoms of anxiety or depression did not report a preexisting mental health diagnosis. Conclusions: Underuse of LABDs and overuse of ICSs are common but are not associated with comorbid anxiety or depression diagnosis or symptoms. Approximately one-third of individuals with COPD experience anxiety or depression, and most are undiagnosed. There are significant opportunities to improve disease-specific and patient-centered treatment for individuals with COPD.

Rationale: Hypoxemia associated with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) often resolves with time. Current guidelines recommend that patients recently discharged with supplemental home oxygen after hospitalization should not have renewal of the prescription without assessment for hypoxemia. Understanding patterns of home oxygen reassessment is an opportunity to improve quality and value in home oxygen prescribing and may provide future targets for deimplementation. Objectives: We sought to measure the frequency of home oxygen reassessment within 90 days of hospitalization for COPD and determine the potential population eligible for deimplementation. Methods: We performed a cohort study of patients ≥40 years hospitalized for COPD at five Veterans Affairs facilities who were prescribed home oxygen at discharge. Our primary outcome was the frequency of reassessment within 90 days by oxygen saturation (Sp(O(2))) measurement. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients potentially eligible for discontinuation (Sp(O(2)) > 88%) and patients in whom oxygen was discontinued. Our primary exposures were treatment with long-acting bronchodilators, prior history of COPD exacerbation, smoking status, and pulmonary hypertension. We used a mixed-effects Poisson model to measure the association between patient-level variables and our outcome, clustered by site. We also performed a positive deviant analysis using chart review to uncover system processes associated with high-quality oxygen prescribing. Results: A total of 287 of 659 (43.6%; range 24.8–78.5% by site) patients had complete reassessment within 90 days. None of our patient-level exposures were associated with oxygen reassessment. Nearly half of those with complete reassessment were eligible for discontinuation on the basis of Medicare guidelines (43.2%; n = 124/287). When using the newest evidence available by the Long-Term Oxygen Treatment Trial, most of the cohort did not have resting hypoxemia (84.3%; 393/466) and would be eligible for discontinuation. The highest-performing Veterans Affairs facility had four care processes to support oxygen reassessment and discontinuation, versus zero to one at all other sites. Conclusions: Fewer than half of patients prescribed home oxygen after a COPD exacerbation are reassessed within 90 days. New system processes supporting timely reassessment and discontinuation of unnecessary home oxygen therapy could improve the quality and value of care.

Rationale: Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are not first-line therapy for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) at low risk of exacerbations, but they are commonly prescribed despite evidence of harm. We consider ICS prescription in this population to be of “low value.” The association of low-value ICS with subsequent healthcare utilization and costs is unknown. Understanding this relationship could inform efforts to reduce the delivery of low-value care. Objectives: To determine whether low-value ICS prescribing is associated with higher outpatient healthcare utilization and costs among patients with COPD who are at low risk of exacerbation. Methods: We performed a cohort study between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2018, identifying a cohort of veterans with COPD who performed pulmonary function tests (PFTs) at 21 Veterans Affairs medical centers nationwide. Patients were defined as having low exacerbation risk if they experienced less than two outpatient exacerbations and no hospital admissions for COPD in the year before PFTs. Our primary exposure was the receipt of an ICS prescription in the 3 months before the date of PFTs. Our primary outcomes were outpatient utilization and outpatient costs in the 1 year after PFTs. For inference, we generated negative binomial models for utilization and generalized linear models for costs, adjusting for confounders. Results: We identified a total of 31,551 patients with COPD who were at low risk of exacerbation. Of these patients, 9,742 were prescribed low-value ICS (mean [standard deviation (SD)] age, 69 [9] yr), and 21,809 were not prescribed low-value ICS (mean [SD] age, 68 [9] yr). Compared with unexposed patients, those exposed to low-value ICS had 0.53 more encounters per patient per year (95% confidence interval CI, 0.23–0.83) and incurred $154.72 higher costs/patient/year (95% CI, $45.58–$263.86). Conclusions: Low-value ICS prescription was associated with higher subsequent outpatient healthcare utilization and costs. Potential mechanisms for the observed association are that 1) low-value ICS may be a marker of poor respiratory symptom control, 2) there is confounding by indication, or 3) low-value ICS results in increased drug costs or utilization. Health systems should identify low-value ICS prescriptions as a target to improve value-based care.

Benzodiazepines are associated with mortality and poor outcomes among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but use of benzodiazepines for dyspnea among patients with end-stage disease may confound this relationship.Assess the mortality risks of long-term benzodiazepine exposure among patients with COPD and comorbid post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), patients with chronic nonrespiratory indications for benzodiazepines.We identified all patients with COPD and PTSD within the Veteran's Health Administration between 2010 and 2012. We calculated propensity scores for benzodiazepine use and compared overall and cause-specific mortality of patients with long-term (≥90 d) benzodiazepine use relative to matched patients without use. Secondary analyses assessed propensity-adjusted survival by characteristics of benzodiazepine exposure.Among 44,555 eligible patients with COPD and PTSD, 23.6% received benzodiazepines long term. In the matched sample of 19,552 patients, we observed no mortality difference (hazard ratio [HR] for long-term use, 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.95-1.18) but greater risk of death by suicide among those with long-term use (HR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.14-4.79). Among matched and unmatched patients, short-term benzodiazepine use, but not long-term use, was associated with increased mortality (short-term: HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.05-1.28; long-term: HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.94-1.13).Risks for respiratory compromise related to long-term benzodiazepine use in COPD may be less than previously estimated, but short-term use of benzodiazepines could still pose a mortality risk. Suicide associated with benzodiazepine use in this population warrants further investigation.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the third leading cause of hospital readmissions in the United States. The quality of care delivered to patients with COPD is known to be lacking across the care continuum, and may contribute to high rates of readmission. As part of the response to these issues, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid instituted a penalty for 30-day readmissions as part of their Hospital Readmission Reduction Program in October 2014. At the time the penalty was instated, there was little published evidence on effective hospital-based programs to reduce readmissions after acute exacerbations of COPD. Even now, several years later, few published programs exist, and we continue to lack consistent approaches that lead to improved readmission rates. In addition, there was concern that the penalty would widen health disparities. Despite the dearth of published evidence to reduce readmissions beyond available COPD guidelines, many hospitals across the United States began to develop and implement programs, based on little evidence, due to the financial penalty. We, therefore, assembled a diverse group of clinicians, researchers, payers, and program leaders from across the country to present and discuss approaches that had the greatest potential for success. We drew on expertise from ongoing readmission reduction programs, implementation methodologies, and stakeholder perspectives to develop this Workshop Report on current best practices and models for addressing COPD hospital readmissions.

Rationale: Hospital readmissions are an important cause of morbidity and mortality among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Although comorbidities are associated with outcomes in COPD, it is unknown how they affect treatment choices. Objectives: We sought to examine whether comorbidity was associated with readmission, mortality, and delivery of in-hospital treatment for COPD exacerbations. Methods: We performed a cohort study of veterans hospitalized with a COPD exacerbation to six Veterans Affairs hospitals between 2005 and 2011. We collected comorbidities in the year before hospitalization. We defined our primary outcome as readmission and/or mortality within 30 days of discharge, and treatment quality as receipt of systemic corticosteroids and respiratory antibiotics during the index hospitalization. Results: A total of 2,391 patients were included. Each one-point increase in Charlson index was associated with greater odds of readmission or death (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18–1.30) and reduced odds of receiving treatment with steroids and antibiotics (aOR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.85–0.95), in adjusted analyses. Patients with comorbid congestive heart failure (aOR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.52–0.79), coronary artery disease (aOR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.60–0.89), and chronic kidney disease (aOR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.55–0.99) were less likely to receive corticosteroids and antibiotic treatment than patients without those comorbidities. We did not identify any comorbidity that was associated with increased odds of receiving appropriate therapies. Conclusions: Comorbidity was associated with 30-day readmission and mortality, and with delivery of fewer treatments known to be beneficial among patients with COPD exacerbation.

Patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) represents a paradigm shift in research methods aimed to create the body of evidence that supports clinical practice and informs health care decisions. PCOR integrates patients and other key stakeholders including family members, policy makers, clinicians, and patient advocates and advocacy groups as research partners throughout all stages of the research process. The importance of PCOR has received increased recognition, yet there is little evidence available to help guide researchers interested in the design and conduct of PCOR. In May 2014, we convened a workshop to identify key issues related to designing, conducting, and disseminating findings from PCOR studies. Workshop participants included a diverse group of patients, patient advocates, clinicians (physicians, nurses, psychologists, and advanced practice providers), researchers, administrators, and funders within and beyond the pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine communities. Participants identified important issues and considerations to address when undertaking PCOR. In this report, we summarize the results of this workshop to inform members of the pulmonary, sleep, and critical care community interested in participating in PCOR. Key findings include the following: 1) requirements for research to be considered PCOR; 2) the potential significant impact of PCOR on patients, clinicians, and researchers; 3) guiding principles and practical strategies to form successful patient-centered research partnerships, conduct PCOR, and disseminate study results to a broad audience of stakeholders; 4) benefits and challenges of PCOR for researchers; and 5) resources available within the American Thoracic Society to help with the conduct of PCOR.

Quality improvement (QI) is a required component of fellowship training in pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. However, little is known about how training programs approach QI education.We sought to understand the perceptions of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine training program directors toward QI education.We developed and fielded an internet survey of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine training program directors during 2013. Survey domains included program characteristics, the extent of trainee and faculty involvement in QI, attitudes toward QI education, and barriers to successful QI education in their programs.A total of 75 program directors completed the survey (response rate = 45.2%). Respondents represented both adult (n = 43, 57.3%) and pediatric (n = 32, 42.7%) programs. Although the majority of directors (n = 60, 80.0%) reported substantial fellow involvement in QI, only 19 (26.0%) reported having a formal QI education curriculum. QI education was primarily based around faculty mentoring (n = 46, 61.3%) and lectures (n = 38, 50.7%). Most directors agreed it is an important part of fellowship training (n = 63, 84.0%). However, fewer reported fellows were well integrated into ongoing QI activities (n = 45, 60.0%) or graduating fellows were capable of carrying out independent QI (n = 28, 50.7%). Key barriers to effective QI education included lack of qualified faculty, lack of interest among fellows, and lack of time.Training program directors in pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine value QI education but face substantial challenges to integrating it into fellowship training.

Sleep disturbance frequently affects patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and is associated with reduced quality of life and poorer outcomes. Data indicate that smokers with preserved pulmonary function have clinical symptoms similar to those meeting spirometric criteria for COPD, but little is known about the driving factors for sleep disturbance in this population of emerging interest.To compare the magnitude and correlates of sleep disturbance between smokers with preserved pulmonary function and those with airflow obstruction.Using cross-sectional data from the COPD Outcomes-Based Network for Clinical Effectiveness and Research Translation multicenter registry, we identified participants clinically identified as having COPD with a smoking history of at least 20 pack-years and either preserved pulmonary function or airflow obstruction. We quantified sleep disturbance by T-score measured in the sleep disturbance domain of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System questionnaire, and defined a minimum important difference as a T-score difference of two points. We performed univariate and multivariable linear regression to evaluate correlates within each group.We identified 100 smokers with preserved pulmonary function and 476 with airflow obstruction. The sleep disturbance T-score was 4.1 points greater among individuals with preserved pulmonary function (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0-6.3). In adjusted analyses, depression symptom T-score was associated with sleep disturbance in both groups (airflow obstruction: β, 0.61 points; 95% CI, 0.27-0.94; preserved pulmonary function: β, 0.25 points; 95% CI, 0.12-0.38). Of note, lower percent predicted FEVAmong smokers with clinically identified COPD, the severity of sleep disturbance is greater among those with preserved pulmonary function compared with those with airflow obstruction. Nonrespiratory symptoms, such as depression, were associated with sleep disturbance in both groups, whereas the relationship of sleep disturbance with FEV

Smoking cessation is the most important intervention for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). What leads smokers with COPD to quit smoking remains unknown.We sought to examine the association between respiratory symptoms and other markers of COPD severity with intention to quit smoking among a cohort of patients with probable COPD.We conducted a cross-sectional study of subjects with COPD or fixed airflow obstruction clinically diagnosed on the basis of pulmonary function testing. The subjects were identified in the COPD Outcomes-based Network for Clinical Effectiveness and Research Translation multicenter registry. The primary outcome was the intention to quit smoking within the next 30 days (yes or no), which was examined using model building with multivariable logistic regression, clustered by study site.We identified 338 current smokers with COPD via the registry. Of these subjects, 57.4% (n = 194) had confirmed airflow obstruction based on pulmonary function testing. Nearly one-third (29.2%; n = 99) intended to quit smoking in the next 30 days. In adjusted analyses, compared with subjects without airflow obstruction based on pulmonary function testing, subjects with Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease stage I/II COPD were more likely to be motivated to quit (odds ratio [OR], 1.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.37-2.49), with no association found for subjects with Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease stage III/IV disease. Among the entire cohort, frequent phlegm (OR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.22-3.64), cough (OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.01-2.99), wheeze (OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.09-3.18), and higher modified Medical Research Council dyspnea score (OR, 1.26 per point; 95% CI, 1.13-1.41) were associated with increased odds of intending to quit smoking. Low self-reported health was associated with decreased odds of intending to quit (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.62-0.92).Frequent cough, phlegm, wheeze, and shortness of breath were associated with intention to quit smoking in the next 30 days, with a less clear relationship for severity of illness graded by pulmonary function testing and self-rated health. These findings can be used to inform the content of tobacco cessation interventions to provide a more tailored approach for patients with respiratory diseases such as COPD.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention describes health disparities that “negatively affect groups of people who have systematically experienced greater social or economic obstacles to health” and inequity as a “difference or disparity in health outcomes that is systematic, avoidable, and unjust” (1). Despite being the only major leading cause of death that continues to increase (2), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is rarely a disease championed by celebrities or the public. COPD is not the subject of viral social media campaigns, such as the recent ice-bucket challenge to fund research for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, a disease that often afflicts younger, otherwise healthy individuals. The face of the patient with COPD is typically older, of lower socioeconomic status, and in the view of many, suffering from self-inflicted injury. The insidious onset and gradual decline in health and functional status that is characteristic of COPD does not typically garner the public support of conditions that are rapidly fatal, such as lung cancer, nor does treatment lead to rapid improvements in health and functional status, such as with low-ejection fraction heart failure. In turn, COPD has received relatively scant attention from primary care clinicians, funders of researchers, and policy makers (3, 4). Nihilism for what can be done for patients with COPD remains rampant, despite a robust evidence base to the contrary (5). By all accounts, patients with COPD represent the paradigm of a group of people at risk for health disparity and inequity. In this issue of AnnalsATS, Gershon and colleagues (pp. 1195–1202) describe a white cloud, but one with a foreboding shadow (6). Using data collected as part of the Provincial Health Ministry from Ontario, Canada, Gershon and colleagues demonstrate that from 1996 to 2011–2012, the COPD population became older and included a greater number of women. In addition, the authors report that among patients with COPD, the standardized mortality decreased 35% during this 16-year period. Although this is encouraging, the reduction in mortality was not shared equitability among patients. Across quintiles of income, patients in the lowest quintiles of income experienced the least mortality benefit. These results are important especially within the United States, where COPD mortality has been flat or continues to rise relative to that of other conditions. Although there are many possible explanations, an obvious difference between patients with COPD in Ontario and those in the United States is the difference in access to healthcare. Unlike in the United States, where health insurance is provided through a porous patchwork of sources, the ability to purchase insurance is not a barrier to healthcare access in Canada, where health insurance coverage is nearly universal. Mortality among patients with COPD is not the same as mortality attributed to COPD. Among patients with COPD, the leading cause of death is attributed to disease comorbidity, not COPD itself. Only among a minority of patients with severe disease does respiratory failure become a leading cause of mortality. One important reason that patients with COPD are at risk for health disparity is most likely not the COPD treatment itself but, instead, modifying COPD comorbidity. Depending on the severity of COPD, the leading cause of death is either cardiovascular disease or lung cancer. Tobacco use, which causes death from both these conditions, has decreased more among patients of higher socioeconomic than lower socioeconomic status. Likewise, other factors associated with early mortality, such as limited access to healthy foods and obesity, are also significantly higher among patients of lower socioeconomic status. The results of Gershon’s article also imply that solving the insurance issue alone may not solve the access or health delivery issue for patients with COPD. Several other factors may represent barriers to receipt of quality care for COPD, such as that patients with limited socioeconomic means often live in more rural areas or within urban environments with significant barriers to transportation (7). Missing work may also have a significant effect on an individual’s income, leading to the decision to forego both preventative and ongoing healthcare. Similarly, being health literate is essential to gain access to complex healthcare systems and to be adherent to multiple medical therapies, both for