Search

Background: Studies show that women with low vitamin D levels have an increased risk of breast cancer (BC) incidence and mortality, but there is a lack of research examining vitamin D levels and prognostic variables in BC patients. The aim of this study is to examine 25-OH vitamin D levels between BC cases and controls and by prognostic indicators among BC cases., Methods: 25-OH vitamin D levels were collected from 194 women who underwent BC surgery and 194 cancer-free (CF) controls at the University of Rochester between January 2009 and October 2010. Mean 25-OH vitamin D levels and odds ratios (OR) were calculated by case/control status for the overall cohort and by prognostic indicators (invasiveness, ER status, triple-negative status, Oncotype DX score, molecular phenotype) for BC cases., Results: BC cases had significantly lower 25-OH vitamin D levels than CF controls (BC: 32.7 ng/mL vs. CF: 37.4 ng/mL; P = .02). In case-series analyses, women with suboptimal 25-OH vitamin D concentrations (<32 ng/mL) had significantly higher odds of having ER- (OR = 2.59, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 1.08-6.23) and triple-negative cancer (OR = 3.15, 95% CI = 1.05-9.49) than those with optimal 25-OH D concentrations. Women with basal-like phenotype had lower 25-OH vitamin D levels than women luminal A phenotype (basal-like: 24.2 ng/mL vs. luminal A: 32.8 ng/mL; P = 0.04)., Conclusions: BC patients with a more aggressive molecular phenotype (basal-like) and worse prognostic indicators (ER- and triple-negative) had lower mean 25-OH vitamin D levels. Further research is needed to elucidate the biological relationship between vitamin D and BC progression.

Background: Breast-conserving therapy (BCT) is an accepted therapeutic option for most breast cancer patients. However, mastectomy is still performed in 30-50% of patients undergoing surgeries. There is increasing interest in preservation of the nipple and/or areola in hopes of achieving improved cosmetic and functional outcomes; however, the oncologic safety of nipple-areolar complex (NAC) preservation is a major concern. We sought to identify the predictive factors for NAC involvement in breast cancer patients., Methods: We analyzed the rates and types of NAC involvement by breast carcinoma, and its association with other clinicopathologic features of the tumors in 787 consecutive therapeutic mastectomies performed at our institution between 1997 and 2009., Results: Among these, 75 cases (9.5%) demonstrated NAC involvement. Only 21 (28%) of 75 of cases with NAC involvement could be identified grossly by inspection of the surgical specimen (seven of these had been clinically identified). NAC involvement was most significantly associated with tumors located in all four quadrants (P<0.0001), tumors>5 cm in size (P=0.0014 for invasive carcinoma and P=0.0032 for in-situ carcinoma), grade 3 tumors (P=0.0192), tumors with higher nuclear grades (P=0.0184), and tumors with HER2 overexpression (P=0.0137)., Conclusions: On the basis of our findings, we have developed a mathematical model that is based on the extent and location of the tumor, HER2 expression, and nuclear grade that predicts the probability of NAC involvement by breast cancer. This model may aid in preoperative planning in selecting appropriate surgical procedures based on an individual patient's relative risk of NAC involvement.

Background: Many believe that breast cancer should be treated by specialists. We studied the effect of surgeon and hospital specialization on survival after breast cancer treatment in a large, well-defined patient population., Methods: The Cancer Surveillance Program database for Los Angeles County was reviewed. Between 1990 and 1998, 43,411 cases of breast cancer were diagnosed, of which 29,666 had complete data on surgeon, hospital, and staging information. Patients were stratified on the basis of surgeon and hospital specialization, as well as by age, race, stage, surgical procedure, and surgeon and hospital case volume. An analysis of survival and its dependence on these factors was performed., Results: Age, race, socioeconomic status, tumor size, nodal status, extent of disease, surgeon specialization, surgeon case volume, and hospital case volume were all associated with 5-year survival after diagnosis of breast cancer. Treatment at a specialty center did not affect survival. Multivariate analysis indicated that type of surgeon was an independent predictor of survival (relative risk,.77), as were both hospital and surgeon case volume., Conclusions: Treatment by a surgical oncologist resulted in a 33% reduction in the risk of death at 5 years. The effect of surgical specialization cannot be entirely attributed to volume effects.

Background: We examined the clinicopathologic profile of T1 cancers to determine whether palpable cancers are different from nonpalpable cancers., Methods: A prospective database was reviewed. Palpable T1 cancers were compared with nonpalpable T1 cancers. Initial significance was determined by chi2 analysis. Factors found to be significant were then reanalyzed. controlling for tumor size by logistic or linear regression, as appropriate., Results: Of 1263 T1 cancers treated between 1981 and 2000, 857 (68%) were palpable and 401 (32%) were nonpalpable. Palpability correlated with pathologic tumor size, mitotic grade, nuclear grade, high S-phase, lymphovascular invasion, nodal positivity, and lack of extensive intraductal component, multifocality, and multicentricity. There was no significant difference in estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor or Her-2/neu status, ploidy, or DNA index. Breast cancer-specific survival was worse for patients with palpable cancers., Conclusions: Palpable cancers are inherently different from nonpalpable cancers, with a less diffuse growth pattern, higher metastatic potential, higher proliferative activity, more nuclear abnormalities, and a worse prognosis.

Background: It is thought that implants interfere with breast cancer diagnosis and that cancers in women who have had breast augmentation carry a worse prognosis., Methods: A prospective breast cancer database was reviewed, comparing augmented and nonaugmented patients for details of histology, palpability, tumor size, nodal status, mammographic status, receptor status, nuclear grade, stage, and outcome., Results: Ninety-nine cancers in augmented women and 2857 cancers in nonaugmented women were identified. Among these women, mammography was normal in 43% of those who had had augmentation and in 5% of those who had not. Augmented women were more likely to have palpable cancers (83% vs. 59%) and nodal involvement (48% vs. 36%), and less likely to have ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (18% vs. 28%). When comparing only women younger than 50, the differences in invasiveness and nodal status lost significance. Cancers diagnosed in the 1990s were more likely to be nonpalpable and noninvasive than those diagnosed in the 1980s. This trend was more pronounced in the augmented population., Conclusions: Augmented patients were more likely to have palpable cancers, although the overall stage and outcome were similar to those of nonaugmented women. Although there have been significant improvements in our ability to diagnose early breast cancer over the past two decades, mammography continues to be suboptimal in augmented women.

Introduction: Approximately 15% of breast cancer patients present with large tumors that involve the skin, the chest wall, or the regional lymph nodes. Multimodality therapy is required, to provide the best chance for long-term survival. We have developed a regimen of paclitaxel, with concomitant radiation, as a primary therapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer., Methods: Eligible patients had locally advanced breast cancer (stage IIB or III). After obtaining informed consent, patients received paclitaxel (30 mg/m2 during 1 hour) twice per week for 8 weeks and radiotherapy to 45 Gy (25 fractions, at 180 cGy/fraction, to the breast and regional nodes). Patients then underwent modified radical mastectomy followed by postoperative polychemotherapy., Results: Twenty-nine patients were enrolled. Of these, 28 were assessable for clinical response and toxicity, and 27 were assessable for pathological response. Objective clinical response was achieved in 89%. At the time of surgery, 33% had no or minimal microscopic residual disease. Chemoradiation-related acute toxicity was limited; however, surgical complications occurred in 41% of patients., Conclusions: Preoperative paclitaxel with radiotherapy is well tolerated and provides significant pathological response, in up to 33% of patients with locally advanced breast cancer, but with a significant postoperative morbidity rate.