10 results on '"Lee CN"'
Search Results
2. Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Decision-Making: The Partners' Perspective.
- Author
-
Nash AL, Bloom DL, Chapman BM, Wheeler SB, McGuire KP, Lee CN, Weinfurt K, Rosenstein DL, Plichta JK, Vann JCJ, and Hwang ES
- Subjects
- Male, Female, Humans, Mastectomy psychology, Quality of Life, Decision Making, Breast Neoplasms prevention & control, Breast Neoplasms surgery, Breast Neoplasms genetics, Prophylactic Mastectomy
- Abstract
Background: The rate of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) continues to rise despite no improvement in survival, an increased risk of surgical complications, and negative effects on quality of life. This study explored the experiences of the partners of women who undergo CPM., Methods: This study was part of an investigation into the factors motivating women with early-stage unilateral breast cancer and low genetic risk to opt for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM). Participating women were asked for permission to invite their partners to take part in interviews. In-depth interviews with partners were conducted using a semi-structured topic guide. A thematic analysis of the data was performed RESULTS: Of 35 partners, all men, 15 agreed to be interviewed. Most perceived their role to be strong and logical. Some hoped their wives would choose a bilateral mastectomy. All felt strongly that the final decision was up to their partners. The partners often framed the decision for CPM as one of life or death. Thus, any aesthetic effects were unimportant by comparison. The male partners had difficulty grasping the physical and emotional changes inherent in mastectomy, which made communicating about sexuality and intimacy very challenging for the couples. In the early recovery period, some noted the stress of managing home life., Conclusions: The experiences of the male partners provide insight into how couples navigate complex treatment decision-making, both together and separately. There may be a benefit to including partners in pre- and post-surgical counseling to mitigate miscommunication regarding the expected oncologic and emotional outcomes related to CPM., (© 2023. Society of Surgical Oncology.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Patient-Reported Outcomes of Breast Reconstruction: Does the Quality of Decisions Matter?
- Author
-
Chettri SR, Pignone MP, Deal AM, Sepucha KR, Blizard LB, Huh R, Liu YJ, Ubel PA, and Lee CN
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Mastectomy psychology, Prospective Studies, Patient Satisfaction, Quality of Life, Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Breast Neoplasms surgery, Mammaplasty psychology
- Abstract
Background: Little is known about how the quality of decisions influences patient-reported outcomes (PROs). We hypothesized that higher decision quality for breast reconstruction would be independently associated with better PROs., Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study of patients undergoing mastectomy with or without reconstruction. Patients were enrolled before surgery and followed for 18 months. We used BREAST-Q scales to measure PROs and linear regression models to explore the relationship between decision quality (based on knowledge and preference concordance) and PROs. Final models were adjusted for baseline BREAST-Q score, radiation, chemotherapy, and major complications., Results: The cohort included 101 patients who completed baseline and 18-month surveys. Breast reconstruction was independently associated with higher satisfaction with breasts (β = 20.2, p = 0.0002), psychosocial well-being (β = 14.4, p = 0.006), and sexual well-being (β = 15.7, p = 0.007), but not physical well-being. Patients who made a high-quality decision had similar PROs as patients who did not. Among patients undergoing mastectomy with reconstruction, higher decision quality was associated with lower psychosocial well-being (β = -14.2, p = 0.01)., Conclusions: Breast reconstruction was associated with better PROs in some but not all domains. Overall, making a high-quality decision was not associated with better PROs. However, patients who did not have reconstruction had a trend toward better well-being after making a high-quality decision, whereas patients who did have reconstruction had poorer well-being after making a high-quality decision. Additional research on the relationship between decision quality and PROs is needed., (© 2022. Society of Surgical Oncology.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. ASO Author Reflections: Breast Reconstruction Decision Quality and Patient-Reported Outcomes.
- Author
-
Chettri SR and Lee CN
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Mammaplasty, Breast Neoplasms surgery
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. ASO Author Reflections: Need for Individualized Risk Prediction to Facilitate Shared Decision Making in Post-mastectomy Breast Reconstruction.
- Author
-
Olsen MA, Myckatyn TM, and Lee CN
- Subjects
- Decision Making, Decision Making, Shared, Female, Humans, Mastectomy adverse effects, Breast Neoplasms surgery, Mammaplasty
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Individualized Risk Prediction Tool for Serious Wound Complications After Mastectomy With and Without Immediate Reconstruction.
- Author
-
Nickel KB, Myckatyn TM, Lee CN, Fraser VJ, and Olsen MA
- Subjects
- Adult, Female, Humans, Mastectomy adverse effects, Postoperative Complications epidemiology, Postoperative Complications etiology, Retrospective Studies, Surgical Wound Infection epidemiology, Surgical Wound Infection etiology, Young Adult, Breast Neoplasms complications, Breast Neoplasms surgery, Mammaplasty adverse effects, Mammaplasty methods
- Abstract
Background: A greater proportion of patients with surgical risk factors are undergoing immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy, resulting in the need for better risk prediction to inform decisions about the procedure. The objective of this study was to leverage clinical data to restructure a previously developed risk model to predict serious infectious and noninfectious wound complications after mastectomy alone and mastectomy plus immediate reconstruction for use during a surgical consultation., Methods: The study established a cohort of women age 21 years or older treated with mastectomy from 1 July 2010 to 31 December 2015 using electronic health records from two hospitals. Serious infectious and non-infectious wound complications, defined as surgical-site infection, dehiscence, tissue necrosis, fat necrosis requiring hospitalization, or surgical treatment, were identified within 180 days after surgery. Risk factors for serious wound complications were determined using modified Poisson regression, with discrimination and calibration measures. Bootstrap validation was performed to correct for overfitting., Results: Among 2159 mastectomy procedures, 1410 (65.3%) included immediate implant or flap reconstruction. Serious wound complications were identified after 237 (16.8%) mastectomy-plus-reconstruction and 30 (4.0%) mastectomy-only procedures. Independent risk factors for serious wound complications included immediate reconstruction, bilateral mastectomy, higher body mass index, depression, and smoking. The optimism-corrected C statistic of the risk prediction model was 0.735., Conclusions: Immediate reconstruction, bilateral mastectomy, obesity, depression, and smoking were significant risk factors for serious wound complications in this population of women undergoing mastectomy. Our risk prediction model can be used to counsel women before surgery concerning their individual risk of serious wound complications after mastectomy., (© 2022. Society of Surgical Oncology.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Dissatisfaction After Post-Mastectomy Breast Reconstruction: A Mixed-Methods Study.
- Author
-
Shammas RL, Fish LJ, Sergesketter AR, Offodile AC 2nd, Phillips BT, Oshima S, Lee CN, Hollenbeck ST, and Greenup RA
- Subjects
- Adult, Female, Humans, Mastectomy, Patient Satisfaction, Quality of Life, Breast Neoplasms surgery, Mammaplasty
- Abstract
Background: Breast reconstruction is associated with improved patient well-being after mastectomy; however, factors that contribute to post-surgical dissatisfaction remain poorly characterized., Methods: Adult women who underwent post-mastectomy implant-based or autologous breast reconstruction between 2015 and 2019 were recruited to participate in semi-structured interviews regarding their lived experiences with reconstructive care. Participants completed the BREAST-Q, and tabulated scores were used to dichotomize patient-reported outcomes as satisfied or dissatisfied (high or low) for each BREAST-Q domain. A convergent mixed-methods analysis was used to evaluate interviews for content related to satisfaction or dissatisfaction with breast reconstruction., Results: Overall, we interviewed 21 women and identified 17 subcodes that corresponded with the five BREAST-Q domains. Sources of dissatisfaction were found to be related to the following domains: (a) low breast satisfaction due to asymmetry, cup size, and lack of sensation and physical feeling (n = 8, 38%); (b) poor sexual well-being due to shape, look and feel (n = 7, 78% [of 9 who discussed sexual well-being]); (c) reduced physical well-being of the chest due to persistent pain and weakness (n = 11, 52%); (d) reduced abdominal well-being due to changes in abdominal strength, numbness, and posture (n = 6, 38% [of 16 who underwent abdominally based reconstruction]); and (e) low psychosocial well-being impacted by an unexpected appearance that negatively influenced self-confidence and self-identity (n = 13, 62%)., Conclusion: Patients may be unprepared for the physical, sexual, and psychosocial outcomes of breast reconstruction. Targeted strategies to improve preoperative education and shared decision making are needed to mitigate unexpectedness associated with breast reconstruction and related outcomes., (© 2021. Society of Surgical Oncology.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Correction to: Dissatisfaction After Post-Mastectomy Breast Reconstruction: A Mixed-Methods Study.
- Author
-
Shammas RL, Fish LJ, Sergesketter AR, Offodile AC 2nd, Phillips BT, Oshima S, Lee CN, Hollenbeck ST, and Greenup RA
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Current Practice and Perceptions Regarding Cost Communication in Breast Cancer Reconstruction: Survey Results of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
- Author
-
Bailey CM, Selber J, Liu J, Lee CN, and Offodile AC 2nd
- Subjects
- Attitude of Health Personnel, Female, Humans, Perception, Surveys and Questionnaires, United States, Breast Neoplasms economics, Breast Neoplasms surgery, Communication, Mammaplasty economics, Surgery, Plastic economics
- Abstract
Background: Rising out-of-pocket costs (OOCs) are a major concern for breast cancer survivors. However, information on how plastic surgeons performing breast reconstruction (BR) perceive and communicate cost information is limited., Methods: An electronic, anonymous survey eliciting plastic surgeons' attitudes and behaviors regarding BR cost communication was distributed to active American Society of Plastic Surgery members. Questions were derived from previously published studies and entailed a 5-point Likert scale. Cost communication was identified based on dichotomized responses to the prompt, "I discuss the costs of breast reconstruction with my patients," and analyzed for associated factors., Results: Of the 5112 surgeons surveyed, 396 plastic surgeons responded (7.21%). Most of the surgeons reported having a sense of a patient's financial well-being (65%) and an awareness of treatment costs (66.9%). Most felt a responsibility to consider the impact of BR costs (69%). Although most of the surgeons expressed that they were comfortable having OOC discussions (58.9%), only a minority reported doing so routinely (24.2%). The fewest respondents (8.6%) cited OOC as an important variable for BR decision-making. Lack of supportive tools was the most cited barrier to having cost communication with patients (64.8%). Cost communication was identified in a minority (20.2%) of surgeon-patient encounters and had no significant relationship to surgeon demographics or practice setting., Conclusions: Plastic surgeons rarely discuss costs of BR with patients despite having a high awareness of the topic and feeling comfortable with it. Prevailing attitudes about the importance of OOC and the lack of administrative support or cost information are likely the drivers of this mismatch and warrant further study.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Long-Term Satisfaction and Body Image After Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy.
- Author
-
Anderson C, Islam JY, Elizabeth Hodgson M, Sabatino SA, Rodriguez JL, Lee CN, Sandler DP, and Nichols HB
- Subjects
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Breast Neoplasms surgery, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Surveys and Questionnaires, Body Image, Breast Neoplasms prevention & control, Breast Neoplasms psychology, Personal Satisfaction, Prophylactic Mastectomy psychology
- Abstract
Background: Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) rates have been increasing in the US, and although high levels of satisfaction with CPM have been reported, few studies have evaluated the long-term effects on body image, comparing CPM with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and unilateral mastectomy (UM)., Methods: We analyzed responses from a survey of women with both a personal and family history of breast cancer who were enrolled in the Sister Study (n = 1176). Among women who underwent mastectomy, we examined satisfaction with the mastectomy decision, as well as variation in the use of reconstruction and experience of complications. Five survey items, evaluated individually and as a summed total score, were used to compare body image across surgery types (BCS, UM without reconstruction, CPM without reconstruction, UM with reconstruction, and CPM with reconstruction)., Results: Participants were, on average, 3.6 years post-diagnosis at the time of survey (standard deviation 1.7). The majority of women (97% of CPM, 89% of UM) were satisfied with their mastectomy decision. Reconstruction was more common after CPM than after UM (70 vs. 47%), as were complications (28 vs. 19%). Body image scores were significantly worse among women who underwent CPM than among women who underwent BCS, with the lowest scores among women who underwent CPM without reconstruction., Conclusions: In our sample, most women were highly satisfied with their mastectomy decision, including those who elected to undergo CPM. However, body image was lower among those who underwent CPM than among those who underwent BCS. Our findings may inform decisions among women considering various courses of surgical treatment.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.