Search

Myxofibrosarcoma is a common sarcoma among older patients, with locally infiltrative behavior and a predilection for local postoperative recurrence. Some studies have reported the factors affecting prognosis, although only a few have mentioned the previous staging classification systems. This study investigated the clinical overview and prognosis of myxofibrosarcoma to determine the optimal treatment.This retrospective study analyzed the records of 349 patients with myxofibrosarcoma in the nationwide Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor Registry in Japan from 2006 to 2015. Clinical features, treatment options, and patient outcomes were investigated.Ultimately, 349 patients were identified. The overall survival rates were 93.1% at 2 years and 84.3% at 5 years. A multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards model. The study identified four significant prognostic factors for survival: tumor size, depth, compartment status, and location. The prognostic score was calculated by summing the scores of all the factors. The overall survival rate was 69.3% at 5 years for the patients with prognostic scores of 6 or higher. Conversely, the patients with prognostic scores of 2 or lower had a survival rate of 95.6% at 5 years.Among myxofibrosarcomas, those larger than 5 cm, deep-seated, invaded into the external compartment, or in axial body parts were associated with a significantly worse prognosis. Adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy did not contribute significantly to a better prognosis. Previous staging classification systems are impractical for prognosis prediction. Therefore, new classifications are needed. Further research on new treatment methods for patients with a poor prognosis will be crucial in the future.

Denosumab has been shown to be highly effective at suppressing the progression of giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB). However, recent studies have observed a potential increased risk of local recurrence after surgery following the use of denosumab, raising concerns on the use of this agent against GCTB in combination with surgery.We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 234 patients with GCTB who were surgically treated at multiple institutions from 1990 to 2017. Patient background, tumor characteristics, treatment methods, local recurrence-free survival rate, distant metastasis rate, oncologic outcome, and limb function at final follow-up were analyzed and compared between cases treated with and without denosumab.The 3-year local recurrence-free survival rate was significantly lower in patients who underwent preoperative denosumab therapy (35.3%) compared with those treated without denosumab (79.9%) (P0.001). Among patients who were preoperatively treated with denosumab, those who had a local recurrence all underwent curettage surgery.Preoperative denosumab therapy in combination with curettage surgery was significantly associated with an increased risk of local recurrence in Campanacci grade 3 tumors. Our data suggest that clinicians seeing GCTB patients should be aware to this increased risk when planning preoperative denosumab therapy.