Search

BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to examine the prognostic significance of margin status following hepatectomy of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) relative to overall tumor burden and nodal status.METHOD: Patients who underwent curative-intent surgery for ICC between 1990 and 2017 were included from a multi-institutional database. The impact of margin status and width on overall survival (OS) was examined relative to TBS and preoperative nodal status.RESULTS: Among 1105 patients with ICC who underwent resection, median tumor burden score (TBS) was 6.1 (IQR 4.2-8.8) and 218 (19.7%) patients had N1 disease. More than one in eight patients had an R1 surgical margin (n = 154, 13.9%). Among patients with low or medium TBS, an increasing margin width was associated with an incrementally improved 5-year OS (R1 31.9% vs. 1-3 mm 38.5% vs. 3-10 mm 48.0% vs. ≥ 10 mm 52.3%). In contrast, among patients with a high TBS, margin width was not associated with better survival (R1 28.9% vs. 1-3 mm 22.8% vs. 3-10 mm 29.6% vs. ≥ 10 mm 13.7%). In addition, surgical margin status did not impact survival with cutoffs of TBS 7 or greater. Furthermore, patients with low or medium TBS and preoperative negative lymph nodes derived a survival benefit from an R0 resection (R1 resection, HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.35-3.44, p = 0.001). In contrast, margin status was not associated with prognosis among patients with a high TBS and preoperative positive/suspicious lymph nodes (R1 resection, HR 1.34, 95% CI 0.58-3.11, p = 0.50).CONCLUSION: R0 resection and wider margin resection resulted in improved outcomes in patients with low tumor burden; however, the survival benefit of negative margin status disappeared in patients with underlying poor tumor biology.

BACKGROUND Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a rare cancer. Patients in rural areas may face reduced access to advanced treatments often only available at referral centers. We evaluated the association of referral center treatment with treatment patterns, outcomes, and geography in patients with ICC. METHODS We queried the Oregon State Cancer Registry for ICC between 1997 and 2016, collecting clinicopathologic, demographic, and oncologic data. Patients were classified by treatment at a referral center or non-referral center. 'Crowfly' distance to the nearest referral center (DRC) was calculated. Outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier, Cox proportional hazards modeling, and logistic regression. RESULTS Over 20 years, 740 patients with ICC had a median age of 66 years. Slightly more than half (n = 424, 57%) were non-referral center treated and 316 (43%) were referral center treated. Referral center treatment increased over time (odds ratio [OR] 1.03/year, p

Introduction: While tumor burden (TB) has been associated with outcomes among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, the role of overall TB in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remains poorly defined. Methods: Patients undergoing curative-intent resection of ICC between 2000 and 2017 were identified from a multi-institutional database. The impact of TB on overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) was evaluated in the multi-institutional database and validated externally. Results: Among 1101 patients who underwent curative-intent resection of ICC, 624 (56.7%) had low TB, 346 (31.4%) medium TB, and 131 (11.9%) high TB. OS incrementally worsened with higher TB (5-year OS; low TB: 48.3% vs medium TB: 29.8% vs high TB: 17.3%, p < 0.001). Similarly, patients with low TB had better DFS compared with medium and high TB patients (5-year DFS: 38.3% vs 18.7% vs 6.9%, p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, TB was independently associated with OS (medium TB: HR = 1.40, 95% CI 1.14-1.71; high TB: HR = 1.89, 95% CI 1.46-2.45) and DFS (medium TB, HR = 1.61, 95% CI 1.33-1.96; high TB: HR = 2.03, 95% CI 1.56-2.64). Survival analysis revealed an excellent prognostic discrimination using the TB among the external validation cohort (3-year OS; low TB: 44.8%, medium TB: 29.3%; high TB: 23.3%, p = 0.03; 3-year DFS: low TB: 32.7%, medium TB: 10.7%; high TB: 0%, p < 0.001). While neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with survival across the TB groups, receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with increased survival among patients with high TB (5-year OS: 24.4% vs 13.4%, p = 0.02). Conclusion: Overall TB dictated prognosis among patients with resectable ICC. TB may be used as a tool to help guide post-resection treatment strategies. info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is an aggressive biliary tract cancer (BTC) with distinct anatomic, molecular, and clinical characteristics that distinguishes it from other BTCs. In this landmark series review, we highlight the critical studies that have defined the surgical management of ICC, as well as several randomized controlled trials that have investigated adjuvant therapy strategies. Surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment and should involve margin-negative resection with regional lymphadenectomy. Several recently completed and ongoing randomized controlled trials are defining the indications for adjuvant therapy among patients with resected ICC. In the near future, improved understanding of the molecular features of ICC should lead to newer targeted therapies as well as a more personalized approach to systemic therapy.

Background: The objective of the current study was to assess the impact of serum CA19-9 and CEA and their combination on survival among patients undergoing surgery for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). Methods: Patients who underwent curative-intent resection of ICC between 1990 and 2016 were identified using a multi-institutional database. Patients were categorized into four groups based on combinations of serum CA19-9 and CEA (low vs. high). Factors associated with 1-year mortality after hepatectomy were examined. Results: Among 588 patients, 5-year OS was considerably better among patients with low CA19-9/low CEA (54.5%) compared with low CA19-9/high CEA (14.6%), high CA19-9/low CEA (10.0%), or high CA19-9/high CEA (0%) (P < 0.001). No difference in 1-year OS existed between patients who had either high CA19-9 (high CA19-9/low CEA:70.4%) or high CEA levels (low CA19-9/high CEA:72.5%) (P = 0.92). Although patients with the most favorable tumor marker profile (low CA19-9/low CEA) had the best 1-year survival (87.9%), 15.1% (n = 39) still died within a year of surgery. Among patients with low CA19-9/low CEA, a high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (odds ratio 1.09; 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.64) and large size tumor (odds ratio 3.34; 95% confidence interval 1.40–8.10) were associated with 1-year mortality (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Patients with either a high CA19-9 and/or high CEA had poor 1-year survival. High NLR and large tumor size were associated with a greater risk of 1-year mortality among patients with favorable tumor marker profile.

The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes for patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) treated with hypofractionated proton or photon radiation therapy (HF-RT). We retrospectively identified 66 patients with ICC who were treated with HF-RT from 2008 to 2018. Median age at RT was 76 years (range 30–92), including 27 patients (41%) aged ≥ 80 years. Median RT dose was 58.05 Gy (range 37.5–67.5), all delivered in 15 daily fractions. Thirty-two patients received proton RT and 34 patients received photon RT. Median follow-up times from diagnosis and RT start were 21 months and 14 months, respectively. In total, five patients (7.6%) developed local failure. The 2-year outcomes were 84% local control (LC) and 58% OS. Among the 51 patients treated with definitive intent, the 2-year LC rate was 93% and the OS rate was 62%. On multivariate analysis for LC, older age was associated with a lower risk of local failure [hazard ratio (HR) 0.91; p = 0.02], while prior surgery (HR 16.5; p = 0.04) and macrovascular invasion (HR 123.93; p = 0.02) were independently associated with an increased risk of local failure. On multivariate analysis for OS, female sex (HR 0.33; p = 0.001) and prior chemotherapy (HR 0.38; p = 0.003) remained significantly associated with OS. On multivariate analysis for OS, compared with photon RT, there was a trend towards improved survival with proton RT (HR 0.50; p = 0.05). The rate of overall grade 3 + toxicity was 11%. One patient developed radiation-induced liver disease and was treated with corticosteroids. HF-RT yields high rates of local control and is an effective modality to optimize biliary control for unresectable/locally recurrent ICC.

Background Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a rare cancer. Patients in rural areas may face reduced access to advanced treatments often only available at referral centers. We evaluated the association of referral center treatment with treatment patterns, outcomes, and geography in patients with ICC. Methods We queried the Oregon State Cancer Registry for ICC between 1997 and 2016, collecting clinicopathologic, demographic, and oncologic data. Patients were classified by treatment at a referral center or non-referral center. ‘Crowfly’ distance to the nearest referral center (DRC) was calculated. Outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan–Meier, Cox proportional hazards modeling, and logistic regression. Results Over 20 years, 740 patients with ICC had a median age of 66 years. Slightly more than half (n = 424, 57%) were non-referral center treated and 316 (43%) were referral center treated. Referral center treatment increased over time (odds ratio [OR] 1.03/year, p

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is an aggressive biliary tract cancer (BTC) that arises from the biliary tract epithelium distal to the secondary biliary radicals. Over the past decade, significant advances have been made in the diagnosis, staging, and treatment of ICC. Emerging data have highlighted the importance of lymphadenectomy for elucidating patient prognosis as well as the at-risk nodal basins based on tumor location (de Jong et al. in J Clin Oncol 29(23):3140-3145, 2011). Several large randomized controlled trials have recently been published clarifying the role of adjuvant therapy for BTCs (Cloyd and Pawlik in J Oncol Pract 14(12):723-724, 2018). In addition, the molecular understanding of ICC pathogenesis has increased over time, leading to new potential molecular biomarkers and opening opportunities for novel targeted and immunologic therapies (Rizvi et al. in Nat Rev Clin Oncol 15(2):95-111, 2018). These recent advances serve to only improve our understanding of the optimal multidisciplinary treatment of this difficult disease.

Many studies have demonstrated associations between surgical resections at academic centers and improved outcomes, particularly for complex operations. However, few studies have examined this relationship in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). The hypothesis of this study was that facility type is associated with improved postoperative outcomes and survival for patients with ICC who undergo resection. Patients with stages 1 to 3 ICC who underwent hepatectomy were identified using the National Cancer Database (NCDB) (2004–2014). Facilities were categorized as academic or community centers per Commission on Cancer designations. High-volume hospitals were those that performed 11 or more hepatectomies per year. Multilevel logistic mixed-effects models to identify predictors of outcomes and parametric survival-time models were used to determine overall survival (OS). The study identified 2256 patients. Of these patients, 423 (18.8%) were treated at community centers, and 1833 (81.3%) were treated at academic centers. Nearly all high-volume centers were academic facilities (98.5% academic vs. 1.5% community centers), whereas low-volume centers were mixed (65.5% academic vs. 34.5% community centers) (p

Objective. We sought to evaluate the utilization of lymphadenectomy (LND) and the incidence of lymph node metastasis (LNM) among different morphologic types of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). Methods. Clinical data of patients undergoing curative-intent resection for ICC between 1990 and 2017 were collected and analyzed. The preoperative nodal status was evaluated by imaging studies, and the morphologic and lymph node (LN) status was collected on final pathology report. Results. Overall, 1032 patients had a mass-forming (MF) or intraductal growth (IG) ICC subtype, whereas 150 patients had a periductal infiltrating (PI) or MF+PI subtype. Among the 924 patients with MF/IG ICC subtype who had nodal assessment on preoperative imaging, 747 (80.8%) were node-negative, whereas 177 (19.2%) patients were suspicious for metastatic nodal disease. On final pathological analysis, 71 of 282 (25.2%) patients who had preoperative node-negative disease ultimately had LNM. In contrast, 79 of 135 (58.5%) patients with preoperative suspicious/metastatic LNs had pathologically confirmed LNM (odds ratio [OR] 4.2, p

INTRODUCTION. Laparoscopic approach to liver resection is feasible and safe, though its utilization with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remains poorly documented. We sought to evaluate the use laparoscopy for ICC, and to examine adherence to oncologic standards. METHODS. The National Cancer Database was queried for patients who underwent resection for ICC. Patients were stratified by laparoscopic (LLR) versus open liver resection (OLR). Clinicopathologic parameters and hospital volumes were recorded. RESULTS. In total, 2309 patients with ICC underwent hepatic resection (1997 OLR, 312 LLR) between 2010 and 2015. LLR increased from 12 to 16% during the study period and was utilized more commonly than OLR for wedge and segmental resections (56% vs. 33%, p

The aim of this study was to examine the impact of anatomical resection (AR) versus non-anatomical resection (NAR) on the survival outcomes in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). Data on 702 consecutive patients who underwent either AR (n = 319) or NAR (n = 383) for ICC were reviewed. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) following AR versus NAR was compared using propensity score matching (PSM). Subgroups of patients who benefited from AR versus NAR were examined after being stratified by the 8th TNM staging of ICC. AR and NAR had similar complication rates (26.6% vs. 25.1%, p = 0.634). AR was associated with better 1-, 3-, and 5-year DFS and OS rates compared with NAR after PSM (58.1%, 35.7% and 28.1% vs. 44.1%, 23.9% and 18.0%; 72.9%, 45.7% and 36.0% vs. 62.0%, 30.8% and 25.3%; both p = 0.002). On multivariate analysis, NAR was associated with worse DFS and OS than AR [hazard ratio (HR) 1.461 and 1.488; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.184–1.804 and 1.189–1.863, respectively]. Stratified analysis demonstrated similar outcomes following AR versus NAR for ICC at stages IA, II with vascular invasion, and III with visceral peritoneum perforation, local extrahepatic invasion and nodal metastasis, while NAR was associated with worse DFS and OS versus AR for stages IB (HR 1.897 and 2.321; 95% CI 1.179–3.052 and 1.376–3.914, respectively) or II ICC without vascular invasion (2.071 and 2.077; 95% CI 1.239–3.462 and 1.205–3.579, respectively). AR was associated with better survival outcomes compared with NAR in ICC patients with stage IB or II tumors without vascular invasion.

[Image: see text]

The purpose of this study was to compare patients undergoing MILS and open liver resections with associated lymphadenectomy for biliary tumors (intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder cancer) in a case-matched analysis using propensity scores. A total of 104 consecutive patients underwent liver resection with associated locoregional lymphadenectomy by laparoscopic approach constituted the study group (MILS group). The MILS group was matched in a ratio of 1:2 with patients who had undergone open resection for primary biliary cancers (Open group). Short- and long-term outcomes were evaluated and compared, with specific focus on specific details of lymphadenectomy. Laparoscopic series resulted in a statistically significant lower blood loss (200 vs. 350, p = 0.03), minor intraoperative blood transfusions (3.2% vs. 7.9%, p = 0.04), and postoperative blood transfusions (10.5% vs. 15.8%), other than shorter length of stay (4 vs. 6 days, p = 0.04). Number of retrieved nodes was 8 versus 7 (p = not significant); particularly, percentage of patients who achieved the recommended AJCC cutoff of six lymph nodes harvested were 93.7% versus 85.8% (p = 0.05). Both overall and lymphadenectomy-related morbidity (bleeding, pancreatitis, lymphatic fistula, vascular, and biliary injuries) were lower in MILS group (respectively 16.3% and 3.2% vs. 22.1% and 5.3%, p = 0.03). Median disease-free survival was 33 versus 36 months and disease recurrence occurred in 45.3% versus 55.3% of patients in MILS and Open groups respectively. Laparoscopic approach for lymphadenectomy is a valid option in patients with biliary cancers, because it allows to maintain the advantages of minimally invasive approach, without compromising the accuracy and the outcomes of nodal dissection.

Objective. Robotic liver surgery (RLS) has emerged as a feasible alternative to laparoscopic or open resections with comparable perioperative outcomes. Little is known about the oncologic adequacy of RLS. The purpose of this study was to investigate the long-term oncologic outcomes for patients undergoing RLS for primary hepatobiliary malignancies. Methods. We performed an international, multicenter, retrospective study of patients who underwent RLS for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), cholangiocarcinoma (CC), or gallbladder cancer (GBC) between 2006 and 2016. Age, gender, histology, resection margin status, extent of surgical resection, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Results. Of the 61 included patients, 34 (56%) had RLS performed for HCC, 16 (26%) for CC, and 11 (18%) for GBC. The majority of resections were nonanatomical or segmental resections (39.3%), followed by central hepatectomy (18%), left-lateral sectionectomy (14.8%), left hepatectomy (13.1%), right hepatectomy (13.1%), and right posterior segmentectomy (1.6%). RO resection was achieved in 94% of HCC, 68% of CC, and 81.8% of GBC patients. Median hospital stay was 5 days, and conversion to open surgery was needed in seven patients (11.5%). Grade III-IV Dindo-Clavien complications occurred in seven patients with no perioperative mortality. Median follow-up was 75 months (95% confidence interval 36-113), and 5-year OS and DFS were 56 and 38%, respectively. When stratified by tumor type, 3-year OS was 90% for HCC, 65% for GBC, and 49% for CC (p = 0.01). Conclusions. RLS can be performed for primary hepatobiliary malignancies with long-term oncologic outcomes comparable to published open and laparoscopic data.

Simultaneous dual hepatic vein embolization (DHVE) has been proposed for safe right-side massive hepatectomy, (Kobayashi et al. in Surgery 167:917–923, 2020, Heil J, Schadde E. in Langenbecks Arch Surg 2020, Narita et al. in Ann Surg 256:e7–8, 2012) and has demonstrated comparable results to associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) (Chan et al. in Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol 5:37, 2020) in terms of liver hypertrophy. In this video, we describe our DHVE techniques to perform a safe right trisectionectomy. A 40-year-old man with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with multiple intrahepatic metastases and vena cava invasion received 20 cycles of gemcitabine plus cisplatin, resulting in remarkable shrinkage of the tumor. Conversion surgery was planned to achieve no evidence of disease status. The future liver remnant (FLR) after right trisectionectomy was 363 ml (29.6% of the whole liver) and simultaneous DHVE was performed. The right portal vein embolization was performed via a transhepatic approach, while the right and middle hepatic veins were accessed via a transjugular approach and self-expandable mesh devices were deployed. Remarkable atrophy of the right lobe and hypertrophy of the left lobe was observed 2 weeks after the procedure. Volumetry showed the FLR increased to 485 ml (40.2% of the whole liver). Three weeks after DHVE, right trisectionectomy with combined resection of the vena cava was performed. The operation time was 311 min, and the blood loss was 420 ml. Pathological examination revealed complete resection of liver tumors, and the volumetry on postoperative day 7 revealed an increased remnant liver volume of 874 ml. He was discharged on postoperative day 10 without any complications. Simultaneous DHVE could be an effective procedure to increase FLR with safety for massive hepatectomy.

Although treatment strategies for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) are shifting towards multidisciplinary approaches, preoperative radiographic methods for identifying patients requiring further therapy are unclear. This study was designed to establish a prognostic grading system using preoperatively available objective biomarkers. A novel preoperative prognostic grading system for predicting survival after surgery for ICC was developed from multivariate analysis of 134 ICC patients who underwent surgery between 1996 and 2015 using preoperatively available biomarkers. The median overall survival time and 3- and 5 year survival rates were 33.3 months, 48, and 38%, respectively. Of the preoperative biomarkers, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (≥5), and C-reactive protein (≥5 mg/L) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (≥500 IU/mL) levels were independently associated with poor overall survival. Based on the presence of these factors, the preoperative prognostic grades were defined as follows: grade 1, no factor; grade 2, one factor; and grade 3, two or three factors. The median overall survival time and 3- and 5 year survival rates of patients with grade 1 (70.3 months, 66, and 53%, respectively) were higher than those of patients with grade 2 (23.4 months, 37, and 30%, respectively; P = 0.004) and grade 3 (8.8 months, 5% both; 2 vs. 3, P

The impact of different causative factors of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) on disease outcome remains largely unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the prognosis of ICC patients with different pathogenic factors after hepatectomy.Data of 731 consecutive patients undergoing R0 liver resection for ICC at The Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital between 2004 and 2010 were analyzed. These patients were divided into the hepatitis B virus-related (HBV-ICC, n = 519), hepatolithiasis-related (stone-ICC, n = 87), HBV plus hepatolithiasis-related (HBV/stone-ICC, n = 45), and other etiologies-related (other-ICC, n = 80) ICC groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to eliminate the baseline differences between these groups.In these four groups, the 5-year tumor recurrence and overall survival (OS) rates were 75.4, 90.3, 83.0 and 81.9%, and 32.7, 16.3, 17.7 and 22.6%, respectively. The significant differences in recurrence and OS were identified between the HBV- and stone-ICC groups (both p 0.001). In these two groups, most of the independent prognostic predictors were similar, but tumor diameter5 cm was demonstrated as a risk factor in the HBV-ICC patients only, and surgical margin1 cm and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive were demonstrated as risk factors in the stone-ICC patients only. With PSM, 75 patients in each of the HBV- and stone-ICC cohorts were created, and the 5-year recurrence and OS rates were 69.9 versus 88.6, and 34.6 versus 19.2%, respectively (p = 0.017, 0.027).Patients with HBV-ICC achieved better outcomes than those with stone-ICC. This prognostic difference was probably associated with biological malignant invasiveness rather than tumor stage.

Background: Although lymph node metastasis (LNM) is an important prognostic indicator for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), the benefit and indication for lymphadenectomy remain unclear. Methods: Patients diagnosed with ICC between 1990 and 2016 were identified in the international multi-institutional dataset. To determine the survival benefit from lymphadenectomy, the therapeutic index was calculated by multiplying the frequency of LNM in a particular group of patients by the 3-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) rate of patients with LNM in that subgroup. Results: Among 471 patients who met the inclusion criteria, approximately half had LNM (n = 205, 43.5%). The median number of resected and metastatic LNs were 4 [interquartile range (IQR) 2-8] and 0 (IQR 0-1), respectively. Three-year CSS in the entire cohort was 29.9%, reflecting a therapeutic index value of 13.0. The therapeutic index was lower among patients with major vascular invasion (5.4), preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) > 5.0 (8.2), and LNM in areas other than the hepatoduodenal ligament (5.2). Of note, a therapeutic index difference of more than 10 points was noted only when examining the number of LNs harvested [1-2 (4.1) vs. 3-6 (16.1) vs. ≥ 7 (17.8)]. Conclusion: The survival benefit derived from lymphadenectomy was poor among patients with major vascular invasion, CEA > 5.0, and LNM in areas other than the hepatoduodenal ligament. Resection of three or more LNs was associated with the highest therapeutic value among patients with LNM. info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Major hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) sometimes involves resection of major hepatic veins, which might result in the future liver remnant (FLR) congestion. The necessity and efficacy of resection and reconstruction of the middle hepatic vein (MHV) during right or left hemihepatectomy for resection of ICC remains unclear. Between 1995 and 2013, 68 patients underwent right (n = 24) or left hemihepatectomy (n = 44) for primary ICC, with (n = 27) or without (n = 41) resection of MHV. If the noncongested FLR volume was

Program death 1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1) have been identified as potential therapeutic targets for solid and hematologic malignancies. The current study aimed to assess PD-L1 expression in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and relate clinical outcomes to its expression. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor specimens were obtained for patients undergoing surgery at Johns Hopkins Hospital between 1991 and 2011. Immunohistochemistry was used to assess PD-L1 expression in tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and within the tumor front (TF). Of 54 tumor samples analyzed, 34 stained positive for PD-L1 expression on TAMs (TAMs+), and 39 stained positive for PD-L1 expression on cells within the tumor front (TF+). The TF+ patients were less likely to present with metastatic lymph nodes (N1 patients: 26.7 vs 7.7 %; p = 0.011), whereas all tumors with intrahepatic metastasis failed to demonstrate staining for PD-L1 around the tumor front (p = 0.020). Patients with tumors shown to be TAMs+ were less likely to present with multiple lesions (35.0 vs 8.8 %; p = 0.017). Patients with tumors exhibiting PD-L1 expression around the tumor front demonstrated a worse overall survival than TF patients (p = 0.008). Multivariable analysis showed that patients with tumors staining for PD-L1 in the tumor front had a 59.5 % reduced survival (TF− vs TF+: time ratio, 0.405; 95 % confidence interval, 0.215–0.761; p = 0.005). Expression of PD-L1 was noted among a majority of patients, and PD-L1 expression within the tumor front was associated with a 60 % decreased survival. Future clinical trials are necessary to assess the safety and efficacy of anti-PD-L1 therapies among patients with ICC.

BACKGROUND Hepatic resection represents the best treatment for primary and metastatic liver tumors but is not always feasible. In early 1980, Piclmayr described a complex liver resection technique, termed "ex vivo liver resection," for the treatment of locally advanced tumors not conventionally resectable. The authors approached this technique with translational research in a preclinical setting and then similarly reproduced it in human patients. METHODS In the swine median xyphopubic laparotomy, the liver was mobilized to expose the vena cava. A temporary porto-caval shunt was previously prepared on the back table using a segment of thoracic aorta, and a vascular anastomosis between the supra-hepatic vena cava and a caval graft was quickly performed. The liver was placed in a machine perfusion system and continuously perfused for 2 h for its final implantation orthotopically in the same animal. The anastomoses were performed as usual. Based on this experience, the intervention was reproduced in the human model of a 39-year-old woman affected by large intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma considered unresectable.' RESULTS All animals survived the procedure. The peak aspartate aminotransferase level (460 ± 87 U/L) was recorded 60 min after reperfusion. Lactate levels flared up for 120 min (3.6 ± 0.2 mmol/L). In the clinical case, the postoperative period was uneventful, and the patient was discharged on day 22. CONCLUSIONS The described procedure is feasible only for surgeons with a transplantation background. The study showed that this translational approach enhances the surgeon's ability to perform the intervention systematically in a shorter time and with a good outcome.

Development of cancer has been linked to inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-17. In this study, we assessed the expression of these cytokines in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and determined their correlation to the survival probability.A total of 72 consecutive patients who underwent curative resection of ICC at Osaka University Hospital from March 1998 to November 2014 were enrolled. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed for IL-17 and its receptor A (IL-17RA), as well as IL-6. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was performed for preoperative plasma levels of IL-6 and IL-17 in 32 patients with ICC.Immunohistochemical analysis showed that the IL-6(high) (n = 34) and IL-17RA(high) (n = 29) groups had significantly worse disease-free survival (DFS) than IL-6(low) (n = 38) and IL-17RA(low) (n = 43) groups, respectively. Although IL-17(+) cells were abundant in the intratumoral area, patients with high peritumoral, but not intratumoral, IL-17(+) cells (n = 28) corresponded with a significantly lower overall survival (OS) and DFS (OS, p = 0.023; DFS, p = 0.026) than those with low group. Moreover, multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis revealed that IL-6, peritumoral IL-17(+), and IL-17RA are independent prognostic factors for DFS (p = 0.023, p = 0.0088, p = 0.039, respectively). In addition, high preoperative plasma levels of IL-6 in patients with ICC corresponded with significantly lower DFS (p = 0.002).Our data suggested that IL-6, peritumoral IL-17(+) cells, and IL-17RA expression are postoperative useful markers for predicting recurrence in patients with ICC.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) often is a diagnosis determined by exclusion. Distinguishing ICC from other metastatic adenocarcinomas based on histopathologic or immunohistochemical analysis often is difficult and requires an extensive workup. This study aimed to determine whether albumin, whose expression is restricted to the liver, has potential as a biomarker for ICC using a novel and highly sensitive RNA in situ hybridization (ISH) platform. Modified branched DNA probes were developed for albumin RNA ISH. The study evaluated 467 patient samples of primary and metastatic lesions. Of the 467 samples evaluated, 83 were ICCs, 42 were hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), and 332 were nonhepatic carcinomas including tumors arising from the perihilar region and bile duct, pancreas, stomach, esophagus, colon, breast, ovary, endometrium, kidney, and urinary bladder. Albumin RNA ISH was highly sensitive for cancers of liver origin, staining positive in 82 (99 %) of 83 ICCs and in 42 HCCs (100 %). Perihilar and distal bile duct carcinomas as well as carcinomas arising at other sites tested negative for albumin. Notably, 6 (22 %) of 27 intrahepatic tumors previously diagnosed as carcinomas of undetermined origin tested positive for albumin. Albumin RNA ISH is a sensitive and highly specific diagnostic tool for distinguishing ICC from metastatic adenocarcinoma to the liver or carcinoma of unknown origin. Albumin RNA ISH could replace the extensive diagnostic workup, leading to timely confirmation of the ICC diagnosis. Additionally, the assay could serve as a guide to distinguish ICC from perihilar adenocarcinoma.