Search

Although neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has become common for breast cancer, its impact on short-term surgical outcomes and the feasible chemotherapy-surgery interval remain unclear. Using a Japanese nationwide database, this study investigated the impact of NAC on short-term outcomes following breast cancer surgery.In this study of 11,722 patients with NAC and 120,538 patients without NAC who underwent surgery for stage 0-III breast cancer July 2010-March 2017, to cancel out site-specific effects, we generated a 1:4 matched-pair cohort matched for age, institution, and fiscal year of admission. We then conducted multivariable analyses adjusting for potential confounders to compare postoperative complications, duration of anesthesia, and total hospitalization costs. Additionally, we conducted three sensitivity analyses for patients with a short interval from NAC to surgery, patients receiving a particular NAC regimen, and patients undergoing a particular surgical procedure.In total, the occurrence of postoperative complications was 6.0%, and the median interval from NAC to surgery was 31 (interquartile range, 24-39) days. The two groups did not differ significantly in terms of complications (odds ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-1.04), including local and general complications. NAC was significantly associated with shorter duration of anesthesia and lower total hospitalization costs. The sensitivity analyses showed similar results.Our matched-pair cohort analyses revealed no significant differences in postoperative complications between patients with and without NAC for breast cancer, regardless of the interval, regimen, and surgical procedure. Patients can safely receive surgery and NAC without a lengthened interval.

Background Metastasis of colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major cause of CRC-related mortality. However, the detailed molecular mechanism of CRC metastasis remains unknown. A recent study showed that the tumor microenvironment, which includes cancer cells and the surrounding stromal cells, plays a major role in tumor invasion and metastasis. Identification of altered messenger RNA (mRNA) expression in the tumor microenvironment is essential to elucidation of the mechanisms responsible for tumor progression. This study investigated the mRNA expression of genes closely associated with metastatic CRC compared with non-metastatic CRC. Methods The samples examined were divided into cancer tissue and isolated cancer stromal tissue. The study examined altered mRNA expression in the cancer tissues using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) (377cases) and in 17 stromal tissues obtained from our laboratory via stromal isolation using an array-based analysis. In addition, 259 patients with CRC were enrolled to identify the association of the candidate markers identified with the prognosis of patients with stage 2 or 3 CRC. The study examined the enriched pathways identified by gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) based on the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) module in both the TCGA dataset and isolated stromal tissue. Results As a result, whereas tenascin-C, secreted phosphoprotein 1 and laminin were expressed in metastatic CRC cells, olfactory receptors (ORs) 11H1 and OR11H4 were expressed in stromal tissue cells isolated from metastatic CRC cases. Finally, upregulated expression of tenascin-C and OR11H4 was correlated with the outcome for CRC patients. Conclusion The authors suggest that upregulated expression levels of tenascin-C and OR11H1 play an important role in CRC progression.