Search

Your search keyword '"Marino, Marco V."' showing total 8 results
Start Over Author "Marino, Marco V." Journal annals of surgery
8 results on '"Marino, Marco V."'

1. Defining Global Benchmarks for Laparoscopic Right Posterior Sectionectomy/H67: An International Multicenter Study

Author

Zhao, Jianping, Lu, Yuanxiang, Zhang, Wanguang, Chua, Darren W., Liu, Qu, Liu, Rong, Pratschke, Johann, Ratti, Francesca, Zimmitti, Giuseppe, Aghayan, Davit L., Edwin, Bjørn, Siow, Tiing-Foong, Scatton, Olivier, Herman, Paulo, Marino, Marco V., Mazzaferro, Vincenzo, Chiow, Adrian K. H., Sucandy, Iswanto, Ivanecz, Arpad, Choi, Sung Hoon, Lee, Jae Hoon, Gastaca, Mikel, Vivarelli, Marco, Giuliante, Felice, Ruzzenente, Andrea, Yong, Chee-Chien, Yin, Mengqiu, Fondevila, Constantino, Efanov, Mikhail, Morise, Zenichi, Di Benedetto, Fabrizio, Brustia, Raffaele, Dalla Valle, Raffaele, Boggi, Ugo, Geller, David, Belli, Andrea, Memeo, Riccardo, Mejia, Alejandro, Park, James O., Rotellar, Fernando, Choi, Gi-Hong, Robles-Campos, Ricardo, Wang, Xiaoying, Sutcliffe, Robert P., Lai, Eric C. H., Chong, Charing C. N., D’Hondt, Mathieu, Monden, Kazuteru, Lopez-Ben, Santiago, Kingham, T. Peter, Ferrero, Alessandro, Ettorre, Giuseppe Maria, Cherqui, Daniel, Liang, Xiao, Soubrane, Olivier, Fuks, David, Wakabayashi, Go, Troisi, Roberto I., Cheung, Tan-To, Sugioka, Atsushi, Long, Tran Cong duy, Abu Hilal, Mohammad, Aldrighetti, Luca, Chen, Kuo-Hsin, Han, Ho-Seong, Goh, Brian K. P., Prieto, Mikel, De Meyere, Celine, Meurs, Juul, Ng, Kelvin K., Lee, Kit-Fai, Tarakanov, Pavel, Alikhanov, Ruslan, Thiruchelvam, Nita, Jang, Jae Young, Kojima, Masayuki, Kato, Yutaro, Kruger, Jaime Arthur Pirola, Coelho, Fabricio Ferreira, Lopez-Lopez, Victor, Casellas I Robert, Margarida, Montalti, Roberto, Giglio, Mariano, Lee, Boram, Wang, Hao-Ping, Salleh, Mansour, Pascual, Franco, Yu, Shian, Chen, Zewei, Vani, Simone, Ardito, Francesco, Giustizieri, Ugo, Citterio, Davide, Mocchegiani, Federico, Colasanti, Marco, Berardi, Giammauro, Guzmán, Yoelimar, Labadie, Kevin P., Conticchio, Maria, Dogeas, Epameinondas, Kauffmann, Emanuele F., Giuffrida, Mario, Sommacale, Daniele, Amory, Boris, Magistri, Paolo, Mishima, Kohei, Kadam, Prashant, Tang, Chung-Ngai, Ghotbi, Jacob, Fretland, Åsmund Avdem, Forchino, Fabio, Mazzotta, Alessandro, Barbara, Marco, Pagano, Duilio, Gruttadauria, Salvatore, Krenzien, Felix, Schmelzle, Moritz, Cipriani, Federica, Lim, Chetana, Zheng, Junhao, Nghia, Phan Phuoc, Valle, Bernardo Dalla, and Cipriani, Federica

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. Propensity Score-Matching Analysis Comparing Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Limited Liver Resections of the Posterosuperior Segments: An International Multicenter Study

Author

Krenzien, Felix, Schmelzle, Moritz, Pratschke, Johann, Feldbrügge, Linda, Liu, Rong, Liu, Qu, Zhang, Wanguang, Zhao, Joseph J., Tan, Hwee-Leong, Cipriani, Federica, Hoogteijling, Tijs J., Aghayan, Davit L., Fretland, Åsmund A., Siow, Tiing Foong, Lim, Chetana, Scatton, Olivier, Herman, Paulo, Coelho, Fabricio F., Marino, Marco V., Mazzaferro, Vincenzo, Chiow, Adrian K.H., Sucandy, Iswanto, Ivanecz, Arpad, Choi, Sung Hoon, Lee, Jae Hoon, Gastaca, Mikel, Vivarelli, Marco, Giuliante, Felice, Dalla Valle, Bernardo, Ruzzenente, Andrea, Yong, Chee-Chien, Chen, Zewei, Yin, Mengqiu, Fondevila, Constantino, Efanov, Mikhail, Morise, Zenichi, Di Benedetto, Fabrizio, Brustia, Raffaele, Dalla Valle, Raffaele, Boggi, Ugo, Geller, David, Belli, Andrea, Memeo, Riccardo, Gruttadauria, Salvatore, Mejia, Alejandro, Park, James O., Rotellar, Fernando, Choi, Gi-Hong, Robles-Campos, Ricardo, Wang, Xiaoying, Sutcliffe, Robert P., Hasegawa, Kiyoshi, Tang, Chung-Ngai, Chong, Charing C. N., Lee, Kit-Fai, Meurs, Juul, D’Hondt, Mathieu, Monden, Kazuteru, Lopez-Ben, Santiago, Kingham, T. Peter, Ferrero, Alessandro, Ettorre, Giuseppe M., Pascual, Franco, Cherqui, Daniel, Zheng, Junhao, Liang, Xiao, Soubrane, Olivier, Wakabayashi, Go, Troisi, Roberto I., Cheung, Tan-To, Kato, Yutaro, Sugioka, Atsushi, Dokmak, Safi, D’Silva, Mizelle, Han, Ho-Seong, Nghia, Phan Phuoc, Long, Tran Cong duy, Hilal, Mohammad Abu, Chen, Kuo-Hsin, Fuks, David, Aldrighetti, Luca, Edwin, Bjørn, Goh, Brian K. P., Syn, Nicholas L., Prieto, Mikel, De Meyere, Celine, Ng, Kelvin K., Salimgereeva, Diana, Alikhanov, Ruslan, Thiruchelvam, Nita, Jang, Jae Young, Kojima, Masayuki, Kruger, Jaime Arthur Pirola, Lopez-Lopez, Victor, Robert, Margarida Casellas I, Montalti, Roberto, Giglio, Mariano, Lee, Boram, Wang, Hao-Ping, Salleh, Mansour, Yu, Shian, Vani, Simone, Ardito, Francesco, Giustizieri, Ugo, Citterio, Davide, Mocchegiani, Federico, Colasanti, Marco, Berardi, Giammauro, Guzmán, Yoelimar, Labadie, Kevin P., Conticchio, Maria, Dogeas, Epameinondas, Kauffmann, Emanuele F., Giuffrida, Mario, Sommacale, Daniele, Amory, Boris, Magistri, Paolo, Mishima, Kohei, Kadam, Prashant, Lai, Eric C. H., Ghotbi, Jacob, Forchino, Fabio, Mazzotta, Alessandro, Kawaguchi, Yoshikuni, Cauchy, Francois, Karam, Elias, Barbara, Marco, and Pagano, Duilio

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

3. Propensity-score Matched and Coarsened-exact Matched Analysis Comparing Robotic and Laparoscopic Major Hepatectomies: An International Multicenter Study of 4822 Cases

Author

Liu, Qu, Zhang, Wanguang, Zhao, Joseph J., Syn, Nicholas L., Cipriani, Federica, Alzoubi, Mohammad, Aghayan, Davit L., Siow, Tiing-Foong, Lim, Chetana, Scatton, Olivier, Herman, Paulo, Coelho, Fabricio Ferreira, Marino, Marco V., Mazzaferro, Vincenzo, Chiow, Adrian K. H., Sucandy, Iswanto, Ivanecz, Arpad, Choi, Sung-Hoon, Lee, Jae Hoon, Prieto, Mikel, Vivarelli, Marco, Giuliante, Felice, Dalla Valle, Bernardo, Ruzzenente, Andrea, Yong, Chee-Chien, Chen, Zewei, Yin, Mengqiu, Fondevila, Constantino, Efanov, Mikhail, Morise, Zenichi, Di Benedetto, Fabrizio, Brustia, Raffaele, Dalla Valle, Raffaele, Boggi, Ugo, Geller, David, Belli, Andrea, Memeo, Riccardo, Gruttadauria, Salvatore, Mejia, Alejandro, Park, James O., Rotellar, Fernando, Choi, Gi-Hong, Robles-Campos, Ricardo, Wang, Xiaoying, Sutcliffe, Robert P., Schmelzle, Moritz, Pratschke, Johann, Tang, Chung-Ngai, Chong, Charing C. N., Lee, Kit-Fai, Meurs, Juul, D’Hondt, Mathieu, Monden, Kazuteru, Lopez-Ben, Santiago, Kingham, Thomas Peter, Ferrero, Alessandro, Ettorre, Giuseppe Maria, Levi Sandri, Giovanni Battista, Saleh, Mansour, Cherqui, Daniel, Zheng, Junhao, Liang, Xiao, Mazzotta, Alessandro, Soubrane, Olivier, Wakabayashi, Go, Troisi, Roberto I., Cheung, Tan-To, Kato, Yutaro, Sugioka, Atsushi, D’Silva, Mizelle, Han, Ho-Seong, Nghia, Phan Phuoc, Long, Tran Cong duy, Edwin, Bjørn, Fuks, David, Chen, Kuo-Hsin, Abu Hilal, Mohammad, Aldrighetti, Luca, Liu, Rong, Goh, Brian K. P., Gastaca, Mikel, De Meyere, Celine, Ng, Kelvin K., Salimgereeva, Diana, Alikhanov, Ruslan, Lee, Lip-Seng, Jang, Jae Young, Kojima, Masayuki, Kruger, Jaime Arthur Pirola, Lopez-Lopez, Victor, Casellas I Robert, Margarida, Roberto, Montalti, Giglio, Mariano, Lee, Boram, Wang, Hao-Ping, Pascual, Franco, Yu, Shian, Vani, Simone, Ardito, Francesco, Giustizieri, Ugo, Citterio, Davide, Mocchegiani, Federico, Colasanti, Marco, Guzmán, Yoelimar, Labadie, Kevin P., Conticchio, Maria, Dogeas, Epameinondas, Kauffmann, Emanuele F., Giuffrida, Mario, Sommacale, Daniele, Laurent, Alexis, Magistri, Paolo, Mishima, Kohei, Krenzien, Felix, Kadam, Prashant, Lai, Eric C. H., Ghotbi, Jacob, Fretland, Åsmund Avdem, and Forchino, Fabio

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

4. Defining Global Benchmarks for Laparoscopic Liver Resections: An International Multicenter Study

Author

Goh, Brian K.P., Han, Ho-Seong, Chen, Kuo-Hsin, Chua, Darren W., Chan, Chung-Yip, Cipriani, Federica, Aghayan, Davit L., Fretland, Asmund A., Sijberden, Jasper, D’Silva, Mizelle, Siow, Tiing Foong, Kato, Yutaro, Lim, Chetana, Nghia, Phan Phuoc, Herman, Paulo, Marino, Marco V., Mazzaferro, Vincenzo, Chiow, Adrian K.H., Sucandy, Iswanto, Ivanecz, Arpad, Choi, Sung Hoon, Lee, Jae Hoon, Gastaca, Mikel, Vivarelli, Marco, Giuliante, Felice, Ruzzenente, Andrea, Yong, Chee-Chien, Yin, Mengqui, Chen, Zewei, Fondevila, Constantino, Efanov, Mikhail, Rotellar, Fernando, Choi, Gi-Hong, Campos, Ricardo R., Wang, Xiaoying, Sutcliffe, Robert P., Pratschke, Johann, Lai, Eric, Chong, Charing C., D’Hondt, Mathieu, Monden, Kazuteru, Lopez-Ben, Santiago, Coelho, Fabricio F., Kingham, Thomas Peter, Liu, Rong, Long, Tran Cong duy, Ferrero, Alessandro, Sandri, Giovanni B. Levi, Saleh, Mansour, Cherqui, Daniel, Scatton, Olivier, Soubrane, Olivier, Wakabayashi, Go, Troisi, Roberto I., Cheung, Tan-To, Sugioka, Atsushi, Hilal, Mohammad Abu, Fuks, David, Edwin, Bjørn, Aldrighetti, Luca, Syn, Nicholas, Prieto, Mikel, Schotte, Henri, De Meyere, Celine, Krenzien, Felix, Schmelzle, Moritz, Lee, Kit-Fai, Salimgereeva, Diana, Alikhanov, Ruslan, Lee, Lip-Seng, Jang, Jae Young, Kojima, Masayuki, Ghotbi, Jacob, Kruger, Jaime Arthur Pirola, Lopez-Lopez, Victor, Valle, Bernardo Dalla, Casellas I Robert, Margarida, Mishima, Kohei, Montalti, Roberto, Giglio, Mariano, Mazzotta, Alessandro, Lee, Boram, Wang, Hao-Ping, Pascual, Franco, Kadam, Prashant, Tang, Chung-Ngai, Yu, Shian, Ardito, Francesco, Vani, Simone, Giustizieri, Ugo, Citterio, Davide, Mocchegiani, Federico, Ettorre, Giuseppe Maria, Colasanti, Marco, and Guzmán, Yoelimar

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

5. Short-term Outcomes After Spleen-preserving Minimally Invasive Distal Pancreatectomy With or Without Preservation of Splenic Vessels: A Pan-European Retrospective Study in High-volume Centers

Author

Korrel, Maarten, Lof, Sanne, Al Sarireh, Bilal, Björnsson, Bergthor, Boggi, Ugo, Butturini, Giovanni, Casadei, Riccardo, De Pastena, Matteo, Esposito, Alessandro, Fabre, Jean Michel, Ferrari, Giovanni, Fteriche, Fadhel Samir, Fusai, Giuseppe, Koerkamp, Bas Groot, Hackert, Thilo, D’Hondt, Mathieu, Jah, Asif, Keck, Tobias, Marino, Marco V., Molenaar, I. Quintus, Pessaux, Patrick, Pietrabissa, Andrea, Rosso, Edoardo, Sahakyan, Mushegh, Soonawalla, Zahir, Souche, Francois Regis, White, Steve, Zerbi, Alessandro, Dokmak, Safi, Edwin, Bjorn, Hilal, Mohammad Abu, and Besselink, Marc

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

6. Propensity-score Matched and Coarsened-exact Matched Analysis Comparing Robotic and Laparoscopic Major Hepatectomies: An International Multicenter Study of 4822 Cases.

Author

Qu Liu, Wanguang Zhang, Zhao, Joseph J., Syn, Nicholas L., Cipriani, Federica, Alzoubi, Mohammad, Aghayan, Davit L., Tiing-Foong Siow, Lim, Chetana, Scatton, Olivier, Herman, Paulo, Ferreira Coelho, Fabricio, Marino, Marco V., Mazzaferro, Vincenzo, Chiow, Adrian K. H., Sucandy, Iswanto, Ivanecz, Arpad, Sung-Hoon Choi, Jae Hoon Lee, and Prieto, Mikel

Abstract

Objective: To compare the outcomes between robotic major hepatectomy (R-MH) and laparoscopic major hepatectomy (L-MH). Background: Robotic techniques may overcome the limitations of laparoscopic liver resection. However, it is unknown whether R-MH is superior to L-MH. Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of a multicenter database of patients undergoing R-MH or L-MH at 59 international centers from 2008 to 2021. Data on patient demographics, center experience volume, perioperative outcomes, and tumor characteristics were collected and analyzed. Both 1:1 propensity-score matched (PSM) and coarsened-exact matched (CEM) analyses were performed to minimize selection bias between both groups Results: A total of 4822 cases met the study criteria, of which 892 underwent R-MH and 3930 underwent L-MH. Both 1:1 PSM (841 R-MH vs. 841 L-MH) and CEM (237 R-MH vs. 356 L-MH) were performed. R-MH was associated with significantly less blood loss {PSM:200.0 [interquartile range (IQR):100.0, 450.0] vs 300.0 (IQR:150.0, 500.0) mL; P = 0.012; CEM:170.0 (IQR: 90.0, 400.0) vs 200.0 (IQR:100.0, 400.0) mL; P = 0.006}, lower rates of Pringle maneuver application (PSM: 47.1% vs 63.0%; P < 0.001; CEM: 54.0% vs 65.0%; P = 0.007) and open conversion (PSM: 5.1% vs 11.9%; P < 0.001; CEM: 5.5% vs 10.4%, P = 0.04) compared with L-MH. On subset analysis of 1273 patients with cirrhosis, R-MH was associated with a lower postoperative morbidity rate (PSM: 19.5% vs 29.9%; P = 0.02; CEM 10.4% vs 25.5%; P = 0.02) and shorter postoperative stay [PSM: 6.9 (IQR: 5.0, 9.0) days vs 8.0 (IQR: 6.0 11.3) days; P < 0.001; CEM 7.0 (IQR: 5.0, 9.0) days vs 7.0 (IQR: 6.0, 10.0) days; P = 0.047]. Conclusions: This international multicenter study demonstrated that R-MH was comparable to L-MH in safety and was associated with reduced blood loss, lower rates of Pringle maneuver application, and conversion to open surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

7. Defining Global Benchmarks for Laparoscopic Liver Resections: An International Multicenter Study

Author

Goh, B. K. P., Han, H. -S., Chen, K. -H., Chua, D. W., Chan, C. -Y., Cipriani, F., Aghayan, D. L., Fretland, A. A., Sijberden, J., D'Silva, M., Siow, T. F., Kato, Y., Lim, C., Nghia, P. P., Herman, P., Marino, M. V., Mazzaferro, V., Chiow, A. K. H., Sucandy, I., Ivanecz, A., Choi, S. H., Lee, J. H., Gastaca, M., Vivarelli, M., Giuliante, Felice, Ruzzenente, A., Yong, C. -C., Yin, M., Chen, Z., Fondevila, C., Efanov, M., Rotellar, F., Choi, G. -H., Campos, R. R., Wang, X., Sutcliffe, R. P., Pratschke, J., Lai, E., Chong, C. C., D'Hondt, M., Monden, K., Lopez-Ben, S., Coelho, F. F., Kingham, T. P., Liu, R., Long, T. C. D., Ferrero, A., Sandri, G. B. L., Saleh, M., Cherqui, D., Scatton, O., Soubrane, O., Wakabayashi, G., Troisi, R. I., Cheung, T. -T., Sugioka, A., Hilal, M. A., Fuks, D., Edwin, B., Aldrighetti, L., Syn, N., Prieto, M., Schotte, H., De Meyere, C., Krenzien, F., Schmelzle, M., Lee, K. -F., Salimgereeva, D., Alikhanov, R., Lee, L. -S., Jang, J. Y., Kojima, M., Ghotbi, J., Kruger, J. A. P., Lopez-Lopez, V., Valle, B. D., Casellas I Robert, M., Mishima, K., Montalti, R., Giglio, M., Mazzotta, A., Lee, B., Wang, H. -P., Pascual, F., Kadam, P., Tang, C. -N., Yu, S., Ardito, Francesco, Vani, S., Giustizieri, U., Citterio, D., Mocchegiani, F., Ettorre, G. M., Colasanti, M., Guzman, Y., Goh, Brian K P, Han, Ho-Seong, Chen, Kuo-Hsin, Chua, Darren W, Chan, Chung-Yip, Cipriani, Federica, Aghayan, Davit L, Fretland, Asmund A, Sijberden, Jasper, D'Silva, Mizelle, Siow, Tiing Foong, Kato, Yutaro, Lim, Chetana, Nghia, Phan Phuoc, Herman, Paulo, Marino, Marco V, Mazzaferro, Vincenzo, Chiow, Adrian K H, Sucandy, Iswanto, Ivanecz, Arpad, Choi, Sung Hoon, Lee, Jae Hoon, Gastaca, Mikel, Vivarelli, Marco, Giuliante, Felice, Ruzzenente, Andrea, Yong, Chee-Chien, Yin, Mengqui, Chen, Zewei, Fondevila, Constantino, Efanov, Mikhail, Rotellar, Fernando, Choi, Gi-Hong, Campos, Ricardo R, Wang, Xiaoying, Sutcliffe, Robert P, Pratschke, Johann, Lai, Eric, Chong, Charing C, D'Hondt, Mathieu, Monden, Kazuteru, Lopez-Ben, Santiago, Coelho, Fabricio F, Kingham, Thomas Peter, Liu, Rong, Long, Tran Cong Duy, Ferrero, Alessandro, Sandri, Giovanni B Levi, Saleh, Mansour, Cherqui, Daniel, Scatton, Olivier, Soubrane, Olivier, Wakabayashi, Go, Troisi, Roberto I, Cheung, Tan-To, Sugioka, Atsushi, Hilal, Mohammad Abu, Fuks, David, Edwin, Bjørn, and Aldrighetti, Luca

Subjects
benchmark, hepatectomy, quality assessment, Settore MED/18 - CHIRURGIA GENERALE, minimally invasive, Surgery, laparoscopic liver resection, global
Abstract

To establish global benchmark outcomes indicators after laparoscopic liver resections (L-LR).There is limited published data to date on the best achievable outcomes after L-LR.This is a post hoc analysis of a multicenter database of 11,983 patients undergoing L-LR in 45 international centers in 4 continents between 2015 and 2020. Three specific procedures: left lateral sectionectomy (LLS), left hepatectomy (LH), and right hepatectomy (RH) were selected to represent the 3 difficulty levels of L-LR. Fifteen outcome indicators were selected to establish benchmark cutoffs.There were 3519 L-LR (LLS, LH, RH) of which 1258 L-LR (40.6%) cases performed in 34 benchmark expert centers qualified as low-risk benchmark cases. These included 659 LLS (52.4%), 306 LH (24.3%), and 293 RH (23.3%). The benchmark outcomes established for operation time, open conversion rate, blood loss ≥500 mL, blood transfusion rate, postoperative morbidity, major morbidity, and 90-day mortality after LLS, LH, and RH were 209.5, 302, and 426 minutes; 2.1%, 13.4%, and 13.0%; 3.2%, 20%, and 47.1%; 0%, 7.1%, and 10.5%; 11.1%, 20%, and 50%; 0%, 7.1%, and 20%; and 0%, 0%, and 0%, respectively.This study established the first global benchmark outcomes for L-LR in a large-scale international patient cohort. It provides an up-to-date reference regarding the "best achievable" results for L-LR for which centers adopting L-LR can use as a comparison to enable an objective assessment of performance gaps and learning curves.

Published
2022

8. Propensity Score-matched Analysis Comparing Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Minor Liver Resections of the Anterolateral Segments: an International Multi-center Study of 10,517 Cases.

Author

Hu J, Guo Y, Wang X, Yeow M, Wu AGR, Fuks D, Soubrane O, Dokmak S, Gruttadauria S, Zimmitti G, Ratti F, Kato Y, Scatton O, Herman P, Aghayan DL, Marino MV, Croner RS, Mazzaferro V, Chiow AKH, Sucandy I, Ivanecz A, Choi SH, Lee JH, Gastaca M, Vivarelli M, Giuliante F, Ruzzenente A, Yong CC, Yin M, Fondevila C, Efanov M, Morise Z, Di Benedetto F, Brustia R, Valle RD, Boggi U, Geller D, Belli A, Memeo R, Mejia A, Park JO, Rotellar F, Choi GH, Robles-Campos R, Hasegawa K, Swijnenburg RJ, Sutcliffe RP, Pratschke J, Lai ECH, Chong CCN, D'Hondt M, Monden K, Lopez-Ben S, Kingham TP, Schmelzle M, Hawksworth J, Peng Y, Ferrero A, Ettorre GM, Cherqui D, Liang X, Wakabayashi G, Troisi RI, Cillo U, Cheung TT, Sugimoto M, Sugioka A, Han HS, Long TCD, Hilal MA, Zhang W, Wei Y, Chen KH, Aldrighetti L, Edwin B, Liu R, and Goh BKP

Abstract

Objective: To compare the outcomes of robotic minor liver resections (RMLR) versus laparoscopic (L) MLR of the anterolateral segments., Background: Robotic liver surgery has been gaining prominence over the years with increasing usage for a myriad of hepatic resections. Robotic liver resections(RLR) has demonstrated non-inferiority to laparoscopic(L)LR while illustrating advantages over conventional laparoscopy especially for technically difficult and major LR. However, the advantage of RMLR for the anterolateral(AL) (segments II, III, IVb, V and VI) segments, has not been clearly demonstrated., Methods: Between 2008 to 2022, 15,356 of 29,861 patients from 68 international centres underwent robotic(R) or laparoscopic minor liver resections (LMLR) for the AL segments Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed for matched analysis., Results: 10,517 patients met the study criteria of which 1,481 underwent RMLR and 9,036 underwent LMLR. A PSM cohort of 1,401 patients in each group were identified for analysis. Compared to the LMLR cohort, the RMLR cohort demonstrated significantly lower median blood loss (75ml vs. 100ml, P<0.001), decreased blood transfusion (3.1% vs. 5.4%, P=0.003), lower incidence of major morbidity (2.5% vs. 4.6%, P=0.004), lower proportion of open conversion (1.2% vs. 4.5%, P<0.001), shorter post operative stay (4 days vs. 5 days, P<0.001), but higher rate of 30-day readmission (3.5% vs. 2.1%, P=0.042). These results were then validated by a 1:2 PSM analysis. In the subset analysis for 3,614 patients with cirrhosis, RMLR showed lower median blood loss, decreased blood transfusion, lower open conversion and shorter post operative stay than LMLR., Conclusion: RMLR demonstrated statistically significant advantages over LMLR even for resections in the AL segments although most of the observed clinical differences were minimal., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results