Search

Objective: The aim of the study is to evaluate whether intra-operative induction with anti-lymphocytic serum (ALS) is superior to no induction in adult liver transplantation (LT)., Background: The efficacy of ALS induction remains inconclusive in LT, because of poorly designed trials., Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted, including 206 adults (>15 years) and comparing tacrolimus monotherapy (TAC, n = 109) and tacrolimus plus a single, intraoperative, high-dose (9 mg/kg), rabbit anti-T-lymphocyte globulins (ATLG; n = 97). All patients had similar follow-up, including Banff-scored biopsies. Rejection was considered clinically relevant and treated if pathologic and biochemical changes were concordant. The primary endpoint was immunosuppression minimization to monotherapy; secondary endpoints were biopsy-proven rejection, clinical rejection, patient (PS) and graft (GS) survival., Results: At 1 year, 79/81 (96.3%) ATLG and 101/102 (99.0%) TAC patients were steroid-free (P = 0.585); 28 (34.6%) ATLG, and 31 (30.4%) TAC patients were on double-drug immunosuppression (P = 0.633). One-year PS and GS of ATLG and TAC patients were 84% and 92% (P = 0.260) and 76% and 90% (P = 0.054).Despite significantly a fewer day-7 moderate-to-severe acute cellular rejections (ACR) in ATLG group (10.0% vs 24.0% in TAC group, P = 0.019), cumulative proportion of patients experiencing steroid-sensitive (11.3% ATLG vs 14.7% TAC, P = 0.539), steroid-resistant (2.1% ATLG vs 3.7% TAC, P = 0.686) and chronic rejection (1.0% ATLG vs 0.9% TAC, P = 1.000) were similar. ATLG administration brought about greater hemodynamic instability and blood products use (P = 0.001)., Conclusions: At 1 year from LT, ATLG induction did not significantly affect immunosuppressive load, treated rejection, patient, and graft survival. The observed adverse events justify a modification of dosing and timing of ATLG infusion. Long-term results are required to judge the ATLG possible benefits on immunosuppressive load and tolerance induction.

: This multicentric study of 17 high-volume centers presents 12 benchmark values for liver transplantation. Those values, mostly targeting markers of morbidity, were gathered from 2024 "low risk" cases, and may serve as reference to assess outcome of single or any groups of patients., Objective: To propose benchmark outcome values in liver transplantation, serving as reference for assessing individual patients or any other patient groups., Background: Best achievable results in liver transplantation, that is, benchmarks, are unknown. Consequently, outcome comparisons within or across centers over time remain speculative., Methods: Out of 7492 liver transplantation performed in 17 international centers from 3 continents, we identified 2024 low risk adult cases with a laboratory model for end-stage liver disease score ≤20 points, a balance of risk score ≤9, and receiving a primary graft by donation after brain death. We chose clinically relevant endpoints covering intra- and postoperative course, with a focus on complications graded by severity including the complication comprehensive index (CCI). Respective benchmarks were derived from the median value in each center, and the 75 percentile was considered the benchmark cutoff., Results: Benchmark cases represented 8% to 49% of cases per center. One-year patient-survival was 91.6% with 3.5% retransplantations. Eighty-two percent of patients developed at least 1 complication during 1-year follow-up. Biliary complications occurred in one-fifth of the patients up to 6 months after surgery. Benchmark cutoffs were ≤4 days for ICU stay, ≤18 days for hospital stay, ≤59% for patients with severe complications (≥ Grade III) and ≤42.1 for 1-year CCI. Comparisons with the next higher risk group (model for end stage liver disease 21-30) disclosed an increase in morbidity but within benchmark cutoffs for most, but not all indicators, while in patients receiving a second graft from 1 center (n = 50) outcome values were all outside of benchmark values., Conclusions: Despite excellent 1-year survival, morbidity in benchmark cases remains high with half of patients developing severe complications during 1-year follow-up. Benchmark cutoffs targeting morbidity parameters offer a valid tool to assess higher risk groups.

Objective: A novel and easy prognostic score based on the combination of pre-operatively available variables in patients with hepatocellular cancer (HCC) waiting for liver transplantation (LT) has been developed from a long waiting time (WT) training set and then validated in a short-WT set., Summary of Background Data: The role of radiological response to loco-regional therapies, alpha-fetoprotein modification, inflammatory markers, and length of WT has been recently shown to be important selection criteria for the risk of intention-to-treat (ITT)-death and recurrence., Methods: The training set consisted of 179 HCC patients listed for LT during the period January 2000 to December 2012 from the UCL Brussels Transplant Centre; the validation set consisted of 110 patients listed during the period January 2005 to December 2014 from the Ancona Liver Centre., Results: The proposed Time-Radiological-response-Alpha-fetoprotein-INflammation (TRAIN) score was the best predictor of microvascular invasion. A TRAIN score ≥1.0 excellently stratified both the investigated populations in terms of ITT and recurrence survivals. When compared with Milan criteria, the proposed score allowed obtaining an increase of potentially transplantable patients (+8.9% in training set and 24.6% in validation set) without additive recurrence risks., Conclusions: The proposed TRAIN score is an easy selection tool based on variables available before LT. This score enables the selection process to be refined in the 2 different scenarios of long and short WT. In case of longer WT, the score is better at predicting risk of death during the WT; in case of short WT, the score is better at identifying risk of post-LT recurrence.