Search

Objective: To clarify the impact of the preoperative time intervals on short-term postoperative and pathologic outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by esophagectomy., Background: The impact of preoperative intervals on patients with esophageal cancer who received multimodality treatment remains unknown., Methods: Patients (cT1-4aN0-3M0) treated with nCRT plus esophagectomy were included using the Dutch national DUCA database. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the effect of different time intervals upon short-term postoperative and pathologic outcomes: diagnosis-to-nCRT intervals (≤5, 5-8, and 8-12 weeks), nCRT-to-surgery intervals (5-11, 11-17, and >17 weeks) and total preoperative intervals (≤16, 16-25, and >25 weeks)., Results: Between 2010 and 2021, a total of 5052 patients were included. Compared with diagnosis-to-nCRT interval ≤5 weeks, the interval of 8 to 12 weeks was associated with a higher risk of overall complications ( P =0.049). Compared with nCRT-to-surgery interval of 5 to 11 weeks, the longer intervals (11-17 and >17 weeks) were associated with a higher risk of overall complications ( P =0.016; P <0.001) and anastomotic leakage ( P =0.004; P =0.030), but the interval >17 weeks was associated with lower risk of ypN+ ( P =0.021). The longer total preoperative intervals were not associated with the risk of 30-day mortality and complications compared with the interval ≤16 weeks, but the longer total preoperative interval (>25 weeks) was associated with higher ypT stage ( P =0.010) and lower pathologic complete response rate ( P =0.013)., Conclusions: In patients with esophageal cancer undergoing nCRT and esophagectomy, prolonged preoperative time intervals may lead to higher morbidity and disease progression, and the causal relationship requires further confirmation., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Objective: To gain insight into the global practice of robot-assisted minimally invasive gastrectomy (RAMIG) and evaluate perioperative outcomes using an international registry., Background: The techniques and perioperative outcomes of RAMIG for gastric cancer vary substantially in the literature., Methods: Prospectively registered RAMIG cases for gastric cancer (≥10 per center) were extracted from 25 centers in Europe, Asia, and South-America. Techniques for resection, reconstruction, anastomosis, and lymphadenectomy were analyzed and related to perioperative surgical and oncological outcomes. Complications were uniformly defined by the Gastrectomy Complications Consensus Group., Results: Between 2020 and 2023, 759 patients underwent total (n=272), distal (n=465), or proximal (n=22) gastrectomy (RAMIG). After total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y-reconstruction, anastomotic leakage rates were 8% with hand-sewn (n=9/111) and 6% with linear stapled anastomoses (n=6/100). After distal gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y (67%) or Billroth-II-reconstruction (31%), anastomotic leakage rates were 3% with linear stapled (n=11/433) and 0% with hand-sewn anastomoses (n=0/26). Extent of lymphadenectomy consisted of D1+ (28%), D2 (59%), or D2+ (12%). Median nodal harvest yielded 31 nodes (interquartile range: 21-47) after total and 34 nodes (interquartile range: 24-47) after distal gastrectomy. R0 resection rates were 93% after total and 96% distal gastrectomy. The hospital stay was 9 days after total and distal gastrectomy, and was median 3 days shorter without perianastomotic drains versus routine drain placement. Postoperative 30-day mortality was 1%., Conclusions: This large multicenter study provided a worldwide overview of current RAMIG techniques and their respective perioperative outcomes. These outcomes demonstrated high surgical quality, set a quality standard for RAMIG, and can be considered an international reference for surgical standardization., Competing Interests: J.R.: Consulting or Advisory Role: Intuitive Surgical. R.v.H.: Consulting or Advisory Role: Intuitive Surgical, Medtronic. T.K.: honorarium for lectures for Intuitive Surgical, Medtronic, Johnson & Johnson, and Olympus. E.K.: Consulting or Advisory Role: Intuitive Surgical. M.v.D.: Consulting or Advisory Role: Intuitive Surgical. J.P.H.: Consulting or Advisory Role: Intuitive Surgical. P.R.: Consulting or Advisory Role: Intuitive Surgical. O.S.-M.: Consulting or Advisory Role: Intuitive Surgical. The remaining authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Objective: The aim of this study was to explore oncologic outcomes of transhiatal gastrectomy (THG) or transthoracic esophagectomy (TTE) for neoadjuvantly treated gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) Siewert type II adenocarcinomas, a multinational, high-volume center cohort analysis was undertaken., Background: Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy or perioperative chemotherapy (CTx) followed by surgery is the standard therapy for locally advanced GEJ. However, the optimal surgical approach for type II GEJ tumors remains unclear, as the decision is mainly based on individual experience and assessment of operative risk., Methods: A retrospective analysis of 5 prospectively maintained databases was conducted. Between 2012 and 2021, 800 patients fulfilled inclusion criteria for type II GEJ tumors and neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy or CTx. The primary endpoint was median overall survival (mOS). Propensity score matching was performed to minimize selection bias., Results: Patients undergoing THG (n=163, 20.4%) had higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification and cT stage ( P <0.001) than patients undergoing TTE (n=637, 79.6%). Neoadjuvant therapy was different as the THG group were mainly undergoing CTx (87.1%, P <0.001). The TTE group showed higher tumor regression ( P =0.009), lower ypT/ypM categories (both P <0.001), higher nodal yield ( P =0.009) and higher R0 resection rate ( P =0.001). The mOS after TTE was longer (78.0 vs 40.0 months, P =0.013). After propensity score matching a higher R0 resection rate ( P =0.004) and mOS benefit after TTE remained ( P =0.04). Subgroup analyses of patients without distant metastasis ( P =0.037) and patients only after neoadjuvant chemotherapy ( P =0.021) confirmed the survival benefit of TTE. TTE was an independent predictor of longer survival., Conclusion: Awaiting results of the randomized CARDIA trial, TTE should in high-volume centers be considered the preferred approach due to favorable oncologic outcomes., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)