Search

Abstract For a topological space X , let L (X) be the modal logic of X where □ is interpreted as interior (and hence ◇ as closure) in X. It was shown in [3] that the modal logics S4 , S4.1 , S4.2 , S4.1.2 , S4.Grz , S4. Grz n (n ≥ 1), and their intersections arise as L (X) for some Stone space X. We give an example of a scattered Stone space whose logic is not such an intersection. This gives an affirmative answer to [3, Question 6.2]. On the other hand, we show that a scattered Stone space that is in addition hereditarily paracompact does not give rise to a new logic; namely we show that the logic of such a space is either S4.Grz or S4. Grz n for some n ≥ 1. In fact, we prove this result for any scattered locally compact open hereditarily collectionwise normal and open hereditarily strongly zero-dimensional space. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: We introduce the bimodal logic , which is the extension of Bennett’s bimodal logic by Grzegorczyk’s axiom and show that the lattice of normal extensions of the intuitionistic modal logic WS5 is isomorphic to the lattice of normal extensions of , thus generalizing the Blok–Esakia theorem. We also introduce the intuitionistic modal logic WS5.C, which is the extension of WS5 by the axiom , and the bimodal logic , which is the extension of Shehtman’s bimodal logic by Grzegorczyk’s axiom, and show that the lattice of normal extensions of WS5.C is isomorphic to the lattice of normal extensions of . [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: We develop duality between nuclei on Heyting algebras and certain binary relations on Heyting spaces. We show that these binary relations are in 1–1 correspondence with subframes of Heyting spaces. We introduce the notions of nuclear and dense nuclear varieties of Heyting algebras, and prove that a variety of Heyting algebras is nuclear iff it is a subframe variety, and that it is dense nuclear iff it is a cofinal subframe variety. We give an alternative proof that every (cofinal) subframe variety of Heyting algebras is generated by its finite members. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

We prove that S4 is complete with respect to Boolean combinations of countable unions of convex subsets of the real line, thus strengthening a 1944 result of McKinsey and Tarski (Ann. of Math. (2) 45 (1944) 141). We also prove that the same result holds for the bimodal system S4+S5+C, which is a strengthening of a 1999 result of Shehtman (J. Appl. Non-Classical Logics 9 (1999) 369). [Copyright &y& Elsevier]