Search

Background In nasal reconstruction, the paramedian forehead flap is traditionally performed in 2 stages. To minimize the risk of flap necrosis, Millard described a 3-stage technique in a series of 5 cases in 1974. In this technique, an intermediate step of flap thinning is performed after flap transfer and before pedicle division. In this article, we compare the 2- and 3-stage techniques of paramedian forehead flaps for nasal reconstruction to determine the type and prevalence of complications related to each procedure. Methods Here, we present a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of paramedian forehead flaps for nasal reconstruction performed during a period of 6 years. We included all patients with 2- (n=87) and 3-stage (n=100) paramedian forehead flaps who had consistent and complete electronic patient records and followed them up for at least 6 months after pedicle division. We performed a regression analysis to adjust for the unequal distribution of complex cases. Results Demographic factors and the causes for the nasal defects were similar in both groups. Although the nasal reconstructions were significantly more complex in the 3-stage group, the rate of partial forehead flap necrosis was similar in both groups (2-stage, 3.4%; 3-stage, 5%; P=0.601). A regression analysis showed that the relative risk of partial flap necrosis in complex cases did not differ significantly between groups (relative risk, 0.80; P=0.705). Conclusions To our knowledge, our study is the largest series published to date and the first one to compare the prevalence of forehead flap necrosis in the 2- versus the 3-stage technique for paramedian forehead flaps. We found no evidence that the use of a 3-stage forehead flap lowers the prevalence of necrosis. Until larger multicenter studies or meta-analyses can be conducted, smaller yet well-conducted studies such as the present one provide critical data and represent an important contribution to the field. Future research should investigate whether the 3-stage technique produces better aesthetic results than the 2-stage technique.

Reconstruction of multilayer defects of the lower nose, using composite grafts from the ear is a widespread technique. Little information exists about important aspects of managing the ear as a donor site for composite grafts. In a retrospective study, patient data were worked up concerning special preoperative planning features (donor site, recipient site), defect closure techniques, donor site morbidity, and esthetic and functional long-term results. One hundred ten composite grafts from the auricle were harvested for different defects at the lower nose. Skin and soft-tissue defect reconstruction at the auricle was carried out by tissue advancement in 43 cases or local flaps in 66 cases. Donor site morbidity was low (5 cases of delayed wound healing, 1 abscess). No flap necrosis occurred. Long-term follow-up (2-5 years) revealed no esthetic or functional impairments. Composite graft harvesting from the auricle is safe with minimal donor site morbidity, proper implementation assumed.

Several technical details of secondary nose correction in unilateral cleft lip procedure are presented. A new technique of total removal of distorted septal cartilage is described, correcting it under full vision and replanting it afterwards into the nose, thus clearing both airways and reshaping the nose profile at the same time. Also different cartilage-mucosal flaps are described as a way to create symmetry in the nasal tip region and both ala nasi.