Search

Objective: This study aimed to determine if preoperative impedance testing changed management and if testing was associated with surgical outcome in patients undergoing airway reconstruction. Methods: Retrospective review of patients who had impedance testing prior to airway reconstruction at a tertiary pediatric hospital from January 2010 to September 2011. Charts were reviewed for demographics, medical/surgical history, impedance testing, and surgical outcomes. Results: Fifty-seven patients were included. Forty-seven (82%) were premature. Forty-seven (82%) had a primary diagnosis of subglottic stenosis. Twenty-six (45%) had prior airway surgery. Thirty-six (63%) had gastroesophageal reflux and 21 (36%) had undergone fundoplication. Patients without fundoplication had a median 46 total reflux, 7 proximal, and 14.5 acidic events compared to a median 5 total reflux, 0 proximal, and 0 acidic events in patients with fundoplication. Impedance testing changed management in 22% (8/36) of nonfundoplication patients and 9.5% (2/21) of fundoplication patients. In unadjusted analysis, fewer fundoplication patients had successful surgery compared to those without (33% vs 67%, P = .01). Prematurity, age at surgery, and previous airway surgery were also important predictors of surgical success. Conclusion: Fewer patients than anticipated had a change in management. Impedance testing was unlikely to change management in fundoplication patients. Patients with fundoplication were less likely to have a successful outcome, suggesting that factors other than reflux influence airway reconstruction outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Laryngotracheal reconstruction (LTR) procedures for repair of complex congenital or acquired airway stenosis of the larynx and/or trachea in pediatric patients have advanced over recent decades. The aim of the present project was to investigate the relationships among diagnoses, type of surgical intervention, and laryngeal findings in a post- LTR patient cohort to identify factors associated with adequate airway protection and swallowing outcomes. Methods: A retrospective review of 30 airway patients undergoing simultaneous or close interval functional laryngeal and swallowing examinations was completed. Analyses of the data were performed to examine factors associated with postoperative airway protection and swallowing function. The patient cohort was separated into 2 groups according to the adequacy of their airway protection (aspiration and no aspiration) as judged by clinicians via instrumental examination. Results: Data analyses revealed statistically significant differences between the 2 groups for 3 key parameters: laryngeal closure, laryngeal closure timeliness (relative to bolus flow), and overall swallowing coordination. Conclusions: These findings contribute to the knowledge of laryngeal closure patterns present in patients undergoing airway reconstruction and the effect on the essential laryngeal function of airway protection during swallowing. Implications of the data for swallowing function in this population are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]