Search

Background: We compared the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on pathologic response and outcome in operable invasive lobular breast carcinoma (ILC) and invasive ductal breast carcinoma (IDC)., Patients and Methods: We extracted from our database all patients with pure invasive lobular (n=118, 14%) or pure invasive ductal carcinomas (n=742, 86%). Their treatment included neoadjuvant chemotherapy, adapted surgery, radiotherapy and adjuvant hormonal treatment., Results: Compared with IDC, ILC presented with larger tumors (T3: 38.1% versus 21.4%, P=0.0007), more N0 nodes status (55.9% versus 43.3%, P=0.01), less inflammatory tumors (5.9% versus 11.8%, P=0.01), more hormone receptor positivity (65.5% versus 38.8%), lower histological grade (P<0.0001). Final surgery was a mastectomy in 70% of patients with ILC (34% were reoperated after initial partial mastectomy) and in 52% of IDC after 8% of reoperation (P=0.006). A pathological complete response (pCR) was achieved in 1% of ILC and 9% of IDC (P=0.002). The outcome at 60 months was significantly better for ILC, but histologic type was not an independent factor for survival in multivariate analysis., Conclusions: ILC appeared less responsive to chemotherapy but presented a better outcome than IDC. While new information on biological features of ILC is needed, we consider that neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in hormone receptor-positive ILC may be a more adapted approach than neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Background: A randomised trial was conducted comparing wide lumpectomy and breast irradiation with modified radical mastectomy. As the follow-up was long (mean duration 22 years), we analysed the variation in the effect of treatment over time., Patients and Methods: The trial included 179 patients with a breast cancer measuring

Background: Analyses of predictive factors for local recurrences are important, as an increasing number of patients with early breast cancer opt for a breast-conserving procedure. This study investigates whether factors predictive of local recurrence differ between patients treated with conservative or radical surgery., Patients and Methods: Two thousands and six patients with invasive breast carcinoma (< or =25 mm) were included. Of these patients, 717 were treated conservatively (lumpectomy and breast irradiation) and 1289 were treated with total mastectomy. All patients had axillary dissection and received lymph node irradiation if axillary nodes were positive. Most patients did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy or additive hormonal treatments. The mean duration of follow-up was 20 years. The main end point was the total local recurrence rate. The risk factors of local recurrence were estimated by multivariate analyses and interaction tests were used for intergroup comparisons., Results: Statistically significant predictive factors for mastectomized patients were histological grade, extensive axillary node involvement (10 nodes or more), and inner quadrant tumors, which were of borderline significance. Young age, however, was not a prognostic indicator for local recurrence. The main statistically significant factor for patients treated with a conservative approach was young age (< or =40 years). These younger patients had a five-fold increased risk of developing a breast recurrence compared with patients older than 60 years., Conclusions: Younger patients with early breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery should in particular be followed up at regular intervals so that any sign of local failure can be diagnosed early.