1. Value of fusion of PET and MRI in the detection of intra-pelvic recurrence of gynecological tumor: comparison with 18F-FDG contrast-enhanced PET/CT and pelvic MRI
- Author
-
Tetsuo Maeda, Hideto Yamada, Satoru Takahashi, Kazuhiro Kitajima, Tomonori Kanda, Natsuko Makihara, Yuko Suenaga, Yasuhiko Ebina, Yoshiko Ueno, and Kazuro Sugimura
- Subjects
Adult ,medicine.medical_specialty ,PET/CT ,Restaging ,Contrast Media ,Multimodal Imaging ,Pelvis ,Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 ,X ray computed ,Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ,Humans ,Medicine ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,Aged, 80 and over ,PET-CT ,Image fusion ,Pelvic MRI ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Gynecological tumor ,Magnetic resonance imaging ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,Magnetic Resonance Imaging ,Fused PET/MRI ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Positron emission tomography ,Positron-Emission Tomography ,Female ,Original Article ,Radiology ,Tomography ,Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ,Tomography, X-Ray Computed ,business ,Nuclear medicine ,human activities ,Urogenital Neoplasms ,MRI - Abstract
Background To evaluate the diagnostic value of retrospective image fusion from pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) in detecting intra-pelvic recurrence of gynecological tumor. Methods Thirty patients with a suspicion of recurrence of gynecological malignancy underwent inline contrast-enhanced PET/computed tomography (CT) and pelvic contrast-enhanced MRI for restaging. Diagnostic performance about the local recurrence, pelvic lymph node and bone metastasis and peritoneal lesion of PET/low-dose non-enhanced CT (PET/ldCT), PET/full-dose contrast-enhanced CT (PET/ceCT), contrast-enhanced MRI, and retrospective image fusion from PET and MRI (fused PET/MRI) were evaluated by two experienced readers. Final diagnoses were obtained by histopathological examinations, radiological imaging and clinical follow-up for at least 6 months. McNemar test was employed for statistical analysis. Results Documented positive locally recurrent disease, pelvic lymph node and bone metastases, and peritoneal dissemination were present in 53.3, 26.7, 10.0, and 16.7 %, respectively. Patient-based sensitivity for detecting local recurrence, pelvic lymph node and bone metastasis and peritoneal lesion were 87.5, 87.5, 100 and 80.0 %, respectively, for fused PET/MRI, 87.5, 62.5, 66.7 and 60.0 %, respectively, for contrast-enhanced MRI, 62.5, 87.5, 66.7 and 80.0 %, respectively, for PET/ceCT, and 50.0, 87.5, 66.7 and 60.0 %, respectively, for PET/ldCT. The sensitivity of diagnosing local recurrence by fused PET/MRI was significantly better than that of PET/ldCT (p = 0.041). The patient-based sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for the detection of intra-pelvic recurrence/metastasis were 91.3, 100 and 93.3 % for fused PET/MRI, 82.6, 100 and 86.7 % for contrast-enhanced MRI, 82.6, 100 and 86.7 % for PET/ceCT and 78.3, 85.7 and 80.0 % for PET/ldCT. Conclusion Fused PET/MRI combines the individual advantages of MRI and PET, and is a valuable technique for assessment of intra-pelvic recurrence of gynecological cancers.
- Published
- 2013