Search

Background: Maternal mortality continues to disproportionately affect low- and middle-income countries, including Liberia. Though the relationship between obstetric triage systems and improved maternal outcomes is well documented, standardized triage protocols are lacking in rural Liberia. Mobile health interventions are a promising method to triage obstetric patients. Objectives: This study explores the acceptability of a WhatsApp Triage, Referral, and Transfer (WAT-RT) system among Liberian midwives and community health assistants. Methods: Individual interviews and focus group discussions were conducted among midwives (n = 18) and community health assistants (n = 112). Interviews were designed to understand the current referral system in rural Liberia, how a WAT-RT System can address referral limitations, and the acceptability of the WAT-RT System. Data were audio recorded, transcribed, and translated into English. Data analysis was conducted via NVivo12 with independent and cooperative techniques among multiple researchers. Findings: The current referral system is not standardized with limitations including a lack of triage protocols, transportation difficulties, and inconsistent communication of patient information, which could be addressed by a WAT-RT System. The acceptability for the WAT-RT System was high. Facilitators to implementation included utilizing a pre-existing communication and referral infrastructure, access and competency surrounding mobile phones, and increased opportunities for training and inter-provider collaboration. Barriers included disproportionate phone access between midwives and community health assistants, network reliability, and a lack of data standards. Recommendations for successful implementation included centralizing phone financing and standardizing triage protocols. Conclusions: The WAT-RT System demonstrated high acceptability among frontline health care providers in rural Liberia. Barriers to program success could be reasonably addressed with simple interventions and planning. Multiple benefits included addressing care delays for obstetric patients, promoting bidirectional provider communication, and increasing the quality of obstetric triage. Future studies should focus on piloting the WAT-RT System among this population and recruiting other key stakeholders to determine intervention feasibility. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Sierra Leone has one of the highest maternal mortality and infant mortality rates globally. We share findings from a Midwifery Clinical Training Needs Assessment, conducted in 2021 as a collaboration between the Government of Sierra Leone and Seed Global Health. The assessment identified existing needs and gaps in midwifery clinical training at health facilities in Sierra Leone from various stakeholders' perspectives. Methods: The descriptive needs assessment utilized mixed methods, including surveys, focus group discussions (FGDs), interviews, and reviews of maternal medical records. Results: The following showed needs and gaps in labor and delivery management; record keeping; triage processes; clinical education for students, recent graduates, and preceptors; and lack of infrastructure and resources. Conclusion: The knowledge gained from this needs assessment can further the development of midwifery clinical training programs in Sierra Leone and other low-income countries facing similar challenges. We discuss the implication of our findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: "Decolonizing global health" (DGH) may help global health trainees understand and remediate the effects of historical colonialism on global health, but little is known regarding how trainees perceive DGH. Understanding their perspectives is critical for designing educational interventions tailored to their needs. Objectives: To understand how trainees perceive DGH research and to determine if perspectives differ between trainees from high- (HICs) versus low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods: An online survey of all 2017–2022 pre-doctoral and post-doctoral trainees (n = 111) and mentors (n = 91) within a multi-university program that supports US and international investigators in one-year mentored global health research. The survey evaluated individuals' self-reported knowledge and attitudes toward DGH and their perceptions of historical colonialism's impact on eight aspects of global health. Findings: The response rate to trainee surveys was 56%. Trainees from LMICs were less aware of the concept of DGH; 5/25 (20%) had never heard of DGH and 16/25 (64%) reported that they "know a little," whereas all HIC trainees had heard of DGH and 29/36 (81%) reported that they "know a little" (p = 0.019). For three aspects of global health (i.e., which research questions get asked; development of collaborative relationships; and data/statistical analyses), trainees from LMICs were more likely to report positive effects of colonialism. However, in open-ended responses, no thematic differences existed between how LMIC and HIC trainees defined DGH (i.e., actively eliminating power imbalances; prioritizing local needs; promoting local leadership; providing equitable opportunities; and ensuring programs are culturally appropriate). Conclusions: Different perspectives surrounding what DGH means suggest a shared understanding may be needed and is arguably prerequisite to designing educational interventions to help global health trainees recognize, understand, and act in global health. Future research is needed to understand perspectives on decolonization across diverse contexts with attention to constructs such as race, ethnicity, and gender. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]