1. Genome and RNA sequencing boost neuromuscular diagnoses to 62% from 34% with exome sequencing alone
- Author
-
Rhett G. Marchant, Samantha J. Bryen, Melanie Bahlo, Anita Cairns, Katherine R. Chao, Alastair Corbett, Mark R. Davis, Vijay S. Ganesh, Roula Ghaoui, Kristi J. Jones, Andrew J. Kornberg, Monkol Lek, Christina Liang, Daniel G. MacArthur, Emily C. Oates, Anne O'Donnell‐Luria, Gina L. O'Grady, Ikeoluwa A. Osei‐Owusu, Haloom Rafehi, Stephen W. Reddel, Richard H. Roxburgh, Monique M. Ryan, Sarah A. Sandaradura, Liam W. Scott, Elise Valkanas, Ben Weisburd, Helen Young, Frances J. Evesson, Leigh B. Waddell, and Sandra T. Cooper
- Subjects
Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry ,RC321-571 ,Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system ,RC346-429 - Abstract
Abstract Objective Most families with heritable neuromuscular disorders do not receive a molecular diagnosis. Here we evaluate diagnostic utility of exome, genome, RNA sequencing, and protein studies and provide evidence‐based recommendations for their integration into practice. Methods In total, 247 families with suspected monogenic neuromuscular disorders who remained without a genetic diagnosis after standard diagnostic investigations underwent research‐led massively parallel sequencing: neuromuscular disorder gene panel, exome, genome, and/or RNA sequencing to identify causal variants. Protein and RNA studies were also deployed when required. Results Integration of exome sequencing and auxiliary genome, RNA and/or protein studies identified causal or likely causal variants in 62% (152 out of 247) of families. Exome sequencing alone informed 55% (83 out of 152) of diagnoses, with remaining diagnoses (45%; 69 out of 152) requiring genome sequencing, RNA and/or protein studies to identify variants and/or support pathogenicity. Arrestingly, novel disease genes accounted for
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF