1. Talking Dogs: The Paradoxes Inherent in the Cultural Phenomenon of Soundboard Use by Dogs.
- Author
-
Włodarczyk, Justyna, Harrison, Jack, Kruszona-Barełkowska, Sara L., and Wynne, Clive D. L.
- Subjects
- *
NONVERBAL communication , *DOG training , *TRAINING manuals , *HUMAN voice , *PARADOX , *DOGS , *SERVICE animals - Abstract
Simple Summary: Dogs that press buttons to communicate with people have attracted a lot of attention on social media recently. This paper explores how communicating with dogs has a long history—particularly as entertainment but also as science—and notes several paradoxes in the presentation of modern button-pressing dogs. These include how these animals are presented as spontaneously expressing their thoughts when they need months of training; how they appear to offer direct access to their thoughts, yet their button presses usually make little sense without someone interpreting them; and how a human skill—language—is needed for dogs to express their canine mental states. We conclude that although well intentioned and playful, this approach to communicating with dogs runs the risk of replacing the ways that dogs truly communicate with people, such as barking and whining, with an infantile form of human communication. In recent years, dogs that appear to communicate with people by pressing buttons on soundboards that replay pre-recorded English words have become very popular on social media online. We explore how these dogs belong to a historical tradition that dates back at least to the Middle Ages and peaked in the early twentieth century. Through analyses of short videos, books, and training manuals, we identify several paradoxes inherent in this phenomenon. These include how the dogs appear to provide unmediated access to their thoughts, and yet, their button presses are typically incoherent and require interpretation. They also require months of training to "spontaneously" express themselves. There is also an anthropomorphism and -centrism in claiming that a human skill—language—is required for a dog to express mental states that it already possesses. This approach to communicating with dogs quiets canine forms of expression such as barking, whining, bodily postures, and odors and replaces them with endearing but infantile human voices. We suggest that, while this endeavor may be well intentioned and often playful, it runs the risk of skewing people's perception of dogs towards fur-clad infants rather than adult members of a different species and of making people less attentive to canine nonverbal communication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF