1. Quantifying carbon and amphibian co-benefits from secondary forest regeneration in the Tropical Andes
- Author
-
P. González del Pliego, Paul Woodcock, Torbjørn Haugaasen, James J. Gilroy, C. A. Medina Uribe, David Edwards, Andrés R. Acosta-Galvis, and Edmund W. Basham
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,geography.geographical_feature_category ,Near-threatened species ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Ecology ,Agroforestry ,Biodiversity ,Old-growth forest ,010603 evolutionary biology ,01 natural sciences ,Geography ,Habitat ,Abundance (ecology) ,Threatened species ,Secondary forest ,Species richness ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Nature and Landscape Conservation - Abstract
Tropical land-use change is a key driver of global declines in biodiversity and a major source of anthropogenic carbon emissions, yet there is a substantial shortfall in the funding available to tackle these issues. We urgently need mechanisms that can simultaneously tackle both biodiversity and carbon losses, with carbon-based payments for ecosystem services (e.g. REDD+) of particular interest. A critical question is whether such payments offer strong carbon–biodiversity co-benefits via the regrowth of forests on abandoned farmlands (carbon enhancements) for amphibians, which are the most threatened vertebrate group and reach the greatest richness of threatened and small-ranged species in the montane tropics (>1000 m a.s.l.). Here, we study changes in amphibian communities across a typical Andean habitat transition from cattle pasture through secondary forests (8–35 years) to primary forest. As secondary forests mature, they recovered the abundance, species richness, species composition and Red-listed (near threatened and threatened) species typically found in primary forest. By contrast, cattle pasture contained much lower richness of Red-listed species and a different species composition compared to forest. We then reveal positive relationships between carbon stocks and amphibian species richness and abundance, Red-listed species richness and abundance and the similarity of communities to primary forests, confirming significant carbon–biodiversity co-benefits. Our results underscore the high conservation value of secondary forests and the strong potential for carbon and biodiversity recovery. Using carbon-based funding initiatives to support the regrowth of forests on marginal agricultural land is therefore likely to conserve threatened biodiversity in the Tropical Andes.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF