Search

Background: Labor pain derives primarily from stimulation of afferents innervating the uterine cervix and lower uterine segment. The authors have previously shown that the excitability of these afferents is regulated by sex hormones and test in this study whether pregnancy also alters their excitability.Methods: After animal care committee approval, Sprague-Dawley rats (nonpregnant, pregnant days 17 and 21) were anesthetized, and two metal rods were placed through the cervix for distension. The right hypogastric nerve was dissected and carefully teased until recording from a single unit was obtained. Spontaneous activity and the response to a graded distension (20-80 g) were recorded for off-line analysis.Results: A total of 151 fiber units were recorded. Pregnancy was associated with an increase in spontaneous nerve activity in the absence of a mechanical stimulus (median of 0.98 and 1.56 Hz from pregnant days 17 and 21, respectively, compared with 0.45 Hz in nonpregnant; P < 0.01). The proportion of fibers responding to the weakest stimulus (20 g) was significantly greater in pregnant than in nonpregnant animals. The response to graded distension differed significantly among groups, with day 21 > day 17 > nonpregnant.Conclusions: Afferents that innervate the uterine cervix sprout into this tissue during late pregnancy, and estrogen increases excitability of these mechanosensitive afferents. Here, the authors show that excitability also increases during pregnancy. These data suggest that, close to the onset of labor, there is an increased input to the spinal cord from cervical distension and an increased depolarization of afferent terminals in the cervix, effects that could influence pain and the progress of labor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Efficacy of analgesics varies with the type of pain. Little is known in this regard concerning labor pain, given the ethical barriers to study in humans and the lack of surrogate animal models. To address this, the authors classified and quantified spontaneous behaviors during labor and delivery in rats and examined the effects of a known analgesic, intrathecal morphine.Methods: Pregnant rats were video recorded for 72 h surrounding the time of anticipated labor and delivery. Specific behaviors were identified and classified into general activities, phasic stretching behaviors, and maternal attention activities. Rats received intrathecal infusion of saline or morphine, 0.035-3.5 microg/h, beginning approximately 1 day before delivery, and effects on behaviors and response to noxious heating of the paw were quantified.Results: Phasic stretching behaviors occurred with high frequency before delivery of the first pup and were rare after delivery of the last pup. Intrathecal morphine at infusion rates greater than 0.035 microg/h abolished these behaviors without affecting general or maternal behaviors or the timing or duration of labor and delivery. Morphine was also antinociceptive to noxious heat, but only at infusion rates of 1.0 microg/h or higher.Conclusions: Phasic stretching behaviors are observed after distension or inflammation of pelvic viscera in rats, and similar behaviors occur during labor and delivery. Selective and dose-related blockade by intrathecal morphine of only these behaviors suggests that they reflect nociception and that this simple monitoring method can be used to study therapies for the pain of labor and delivery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The COVID-19 outbreak has led to 80,409 diagnosed cases and 3,012 deaths in mainland China based on the data released on March 4, 2020. Approximately 3.2% of patients with COVID-19 required intubation and invasive ventilation at some point in the disease course. Providing best practices regarding intubation and ventilation for an overwhelming number of patients with COVID-19 amid an enhanced risk of cross-infection is a daunting undertaking. The authors presented the experience of caring for the critically ill patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan. It is extremely important to follow strict self-protection precautions. Timely, but not premature, intubation is crucial to counter a progressively enlarging oxygen debt despite high-flow oxygen therapy and bilevel positive airway pressure ventilation. Thorough preparation, satisfactory preoxygenation, modified rapid sequence induction, and rapid intubation using a video laryngoscope are widely used intubation strategies in Wuhan. Lung-protective ventilation, prone position ventilation, and adequate sedation and analgesia are essential components of ventilation management.

Background: Preclinical data suggest that oxytocin reduces hypersensitivity by actions in the spinal cord, but whether it produces antinociception to acute stimuli is unclear. In this article, the authors examined the safety of intrathecal oxytocin and screened its effects on acute noxious stimuli., Methods: After institutional review board and Food and Drug Administration approval, healthy adult volunteers received 5, 15, 50, or 150 μg intrathecal oxytocin in a dose-escalating manner in cohorts of five subjects. Hemodynamic and neurologic assessments were performed for 4 h after injections and 24 h later, at which time serum sodium was also measured. Cerebrospinal fluid was obtained 60 min after injection, and responses to noxious heat stimuli in arm and leg as well as temporal summation to repeated application of a von Frey filament were obtained., Results: One subject receiving the highest dose experienced transient hypotension and bradycardia as well as subjective numbness in a lumbo-sacral distribution. No other subject experienced subjective or objective neurologic symptoms. Overall, blood pressure and heart rate increased 1 to 4 h after injection by less than 15% with no dose dependency. There was no effect on serum sodium, and cerebrospinal fluid oxytocin increased in a dose-dependent manner after injection. Pain scores to noxious heat stimuli were unaffected by oxytocin, and the temporal summation protocol failed to show summation before or after drug treatment., Conclusion: This small study supports further investigation on oxytocin for analgesia for hypersensitivity states, with continued systematic surveillance for possible effects on blood pressure, heart rate, and neurologic function.

Background: Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, the most commonly used analgesics, reduce pain not only by inhibiting cyclooxygenase at peripheral sites of inflammation but also by potentially inhibiting cyclooxygenase in the central nervous system, especially the spinal cord. Animal studies suggest that products of cyclooxygenase in the spinal cord do not alter pain responses to acute noxious stimuli but reduce pain and sensitization after peripheral inflammation. We used a spinal injection of small doses of the cyclooxygenase inhibitor ketorolac to survey the role of spinal cyclooxygenase in human experimental pain and hypersensitivity states., Methods: After regulatory agency approval and informed consent, we examined the effect of 2.0 mg intrathecal ketorolac in 41 healthy volunteers to acute noxious thermal stimuli in normal skin and to mechanical stimuli in skin sensitized by topical capsaicin or ultraviolet burn. We also examined the effect of intravenous ketorolac., Results: Intrathecal ketorolac reduced hypersensitivity when it was induced by a combination of ultraviolet burn plus intermittent heat and, according to one of the two analytical strategies, when it was induced by ultraviolet burn alone., Conclusions: These data suggest a more limited role for spinal cord cyclooxygenase in human pain states than predicted by studies in animals.

Background: Uterine cervical distension underlies labor pain, yet its neurophysiology and pharmacology of inhibition remain unexplored. The authors examined uterine cervical distension-evoked cFos immunoreactivity in rat spinal cords, and the inhibitory effect of spinal cyclo-oxygenase inhibition on cFos expression., Methods: Female rats were anesthetized with halothane, and pairs of metal rods were inserted in each cervical os through a mid-line laparotomy. A submaximal distension force (75 g) was applied for either 30 or 60 min, or, in control animals, no force was applied. Other animals received cervical lidocaine infiltration prior to uterine cervical distension. At the end of the experiments, the spinal cord at T12 to L2 levels was harvested and immunostained for cFos protein. Other animals received intrathecal ketorolac (0, 5, 25, and 50 microg; n = 5-6 for each group) prior to uterine cervical distension., Results: Uterine cervical distension significantly increased cFos immunoreactivity in the spinal cord from T12 to L2, with most cFos expression in the deep dorsal and central canal regions. Surgical preparation alone without uterine cervical distension resulted in minimal cFos expression, primarily in the superficial dorsal horn. Uterine cervical distension-evoked cFos expression was prevented by prior infiltration of lidocaine into the cervix. Intrathecal ketorolac produced a dose-dependent inhibition of uterine cervical distension-induced cFos expression., Conclusion: The present study demonstrates that uterine cervical distension results in a similar pattern of spinal cord neuronal activation as seen with other noxious visceral stimuli. The inhibition of cFos expression by intrathecal ketorolac suggests that spinal cyclo-oxygenase plays a role in uterine cervical distension-induced nociception.

Background: alpha2-Adrenergic agonists produce analgesia primarily by a spinal action and hypotension and bradycardia by actions at several sites. Clonidine is approved for epidural use in the treatment of neuropathic pain, but its wider application is limited by hemodynamic side effects. This study determined the antinociceptive and hemodynamic effects of a novel alpha2-adrenergic agonist, MPV-2426, in sheep., Methods: Forty sheep of mixed Western breeds with indwelling catheters were studied. In separate studies, antinociception to a mechanical stimulus, hemodynamic effects, arterial blood gas tensions, cerebrospinal fluid pharmacokinetics, and spinal cord blood flow was determined after epidural, intrathecal, and intravenous injection of MPV-2426., Results: MPV-2426 produced antinociception with greater potency intrathecally (ED50 = 49 microg) than epidurally (ED50 = 202 microg), whereas intravenous administration had no effect. Intrathecal injection, in doses up to three times the ED95, failed to decrease systemic or central arterial blood pressures or heart rate, whereas larger doses, regardless of route, increased systemic arterial pressure. Bioavailability in cerebrospinal fluid was 7% after epidural administration and 0.17% after intravenous administration. Intrathecal MPV-2426, in an ED95 dose and three times this dose, produced a dose-independent reduction in thoracic and lumbar spinal cord blood flow., Conclusions: MPV-2426 shares many characteristics of other alpha2-adrenergic agonists examined in sheep, but differs from clonidine and dexmedetomidine by lack of antinociception and minimal reduction in oxygen partial pressure after large intravenous and epidural injections. No hemodynamic depression was observed after intrathecal injection at antinociceptive doses. These results suggest this compound may be an effective spinal analgesic in humans with less hypotension than clonidine, although its relative potency to cause sedation was not tested in this study.

Background: This study defines the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pharmacokinetics of neostigmine after intrathecal injection in humans and its effect on CSF acetylcholine, and it correlates physiologic effects with neostigmine dose and CSF acetylcholine concentrations., Methods: The CSF was sampled via an indwelling spinal catheter in 12 volunteers receiving intrathecal neostigmine (50-750 microg) and analyzed for neostigmine and acetylcholine. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses were performed with NONMEM. Effect-site models linked the time course of the neostigmine concentration with the time course of analgesia., Results: Acetylcholine concentrations increased from <20 pmol/ml at baseline to >100 pmol/ml within 15 min of neostigmine injection. The pharmacokinetics of intrathecal neostigmine were best described by a triexponential function with an absorption phase. Individual predicted concentrations varied 100-fold. Post hoc Bayesian estimates described the observed neostigmine concentrations with a median error of 22% and did not show systematic model misspecification. Individual estimates of effect site concentration producing a 50% maximal effect for foot visual analog scale analgesia correlated with the magnitude of individual CSF neostigmine concentrations., Conclusions: Intrathecal neostigmine concentrations can be well described by a triexponential disposition function, but the intersubject variability is large. The correlation between intersubject variability in concentration and intersubject variability in 50% maximal effect for foot analgesia suggests that both are offset by a common scalar, possibly the distance from the site of injection to the sampling and effect sites. These data provide the basis for the hypothesis of "observation at a distance" to describe the pharmacodynamics of intrathecally administered drugs.

Background: Intrathecal injection of clonidine and dexmedetomidine produce behavioral analgesia by an alpha 2-adrenergic mechanism. Functional and anatomic studies suggest that this analgesia is mediated by cholinergic activation. This hypothesis was directly tested by measuring extracellular acetylcholine concentrations in spinal cord interstitial fluid by means of microdialysis after intrathecal injection of these alpha 2-adrenergic agonists in sheep., Methods: Twelve sheep with chronically implanted thoracic intrathecal catheters were anesthetized with halothane. Multiple 200-micron-diameter dialysis fibers were inserted surgically at a mid-thoracic level through the dorsal horn and perfused with artificial cerebrospinal fluid. After baseline sampling, either clonidine (100 micrograms), dexmedetomidine (100 micrograms), or saline were injected intrathecally. Microdialysis samples were analyzed by high-pressure liquid chromatography for acetylcholine and norepinephrine., Results: Both alpha 2-adrenergic agonists increased acetylcholine in microdialysate, whereas intrathecal saline had no effect. Analysis of the raw data showed that all groups differed significantly, with greater levels of acetylcholine following administration of dexmedetomidine than clonidine or saline. Unexpectedly, intrathecal clonidine also increased microdialysate norepinephrine levels., Conclusions: These data are consistent with previous experiments measuring acetylcholine concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid and support analgesia from alpha 2-adrenergic agonists mediated in part by cholinergic activation. In addition, the increase in norepinephrine concentrations after intrathecal administration of clonidine suggest stimulation of norepinephrine release by this agent.

Background: Intradermal injection of capsaicin produces brief pain followed by hyperalgesia and allodynia in humans, and the latter effects are mediated by spinal N-methyl-D-aspartate mechanisms. Amitriptyline recently was shown to antagonize N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors, and in this study, the authors sought to determine the effect of amitriptyline alone and with the opioid alfentanil on hyperalgesia and allodynia produced by intradermal injection of capsaicin., Methods: Forty-six healthy volunteers in the general clinical research center received repeated intradermal injections of capsaicin (100 microg) alone or before and after systemic injection of 4 mg midazolam, 25 mg amitriptyline, alfentanil by computer-controlled infusion, or amitriptyline plus alfentanil. Acute pain and areas of mechanical hyperalgesia and allodynia were determined at specified intervals. Blood was obtained for alfentanil and amitriptyline assay., Results: Capsaicin injection produced acute pain followed by hyperalgesia and allodynia. Alfentanil reduced these pain responses in a plasma-concentration-dependent manner, and reduction in hyperalgesia and allodynia correlated with reduction in acute pain. Amitriptyline alone had no effect and did not potentiate alfentanil. Alfentanil produced concentration-dependent nausea, an effect diminished by amitriptyline., Discussion: These data correspond with previous studies in volunteers demonstrating reduction in hyperalgesia and allodynia after intradermal injection of capsaicin by systemically administered opioids, and they suggest that this reduction may be secondary to reduced nociceptive input by acute analgesia. These data do not support the use of acute systemic administration of amitriptyline for acute pain, hyperalgesia, and allodynia, although the roles of chronic treatment and spinal administration are being investigated.

Background: Intrathecal injection of amitriptyline enhances antinociception from intravenous morphine and reduces neuropathic pain behavior in animals. This study represents part of a preclinical assessment of intrathecal amitriptyline to determine its safety for use in humans., Methods: Low thoracic intrathecal, femoral, and pulmonary arterial catheters were inserted in 18 adult ewes, followed 96 h later by intrathecal injection of saline or 5 mg amitriptyline and by determination of spinal cord blood flow, hemodynamic variables, behavioral changes, cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of catecholamines and amitriptyline, and spinal tissue concentrations of amitriptyline. In six other ewes, low thoracic intrathecal and femoral arterial catheters were inserted and blood pressure and heart rate were measured after intrathecal injection of saline or 0.25, 1, or 5 mg amitriptyline. Four other ewes received cervical intrathecal injection of 5 and 10 mg amitriptyline, and antinociception was determined., Results: Thoracic intrathecal injection of amitriptyline produced dose-dependent sedation but did not significantly affect spinal cord blood flow or hemodynamic variables. Spinal cord tissue concentrations of amitriptyline were 100 times greater in tissue near the tip of the thoracic intrathecal catheter compared with cervical cord tissue. Cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of catecholamines did not significantly change after amitriptyline was administered. Cervical intrathecal injection of 5 mg amitriptyline produced mild antinociception, whereas 10 mg produced intense sedation and, in one sheep, seizures and death., Conclusions: Although other preclinical toxicity studies are necessary before introducing intrathecal amitriptyline for use in humans, this study did not reveal dangerous changes in blood pressure or spinal cord blood flow from this agent.

Background: alpha 2-Adrenergic agonists are thought to produce analgesia, in part, by activating spinal acetylcholine release. The purpose of the current study was to examine the interaction between intrathecal neostigmine and epidural clonidine for analgesia and side effects in humans., Methods: A total of 58 volunteers received an intrathecal injection of 5% dextrose in normal saline (D5NS) or neostigmine (50, 100, or 200 micrograms in D5NS), followed in 1 h by epidural saline or clonidine (computer-controlled infusion targeted to 50, 100, 200, or 400 ng/ml in cerebrospinal fluid) using an isobolographic design. Visual analog scale pain to a noxious cold stimulus, nausea, weakness, sedation, and other safety variables was measured before and at specified intervals after drug administration., Results: The first 21 volunteers randomized to receive intrathecal hyperbaric neostigmine rather than D5NS received the drug while in the sitting position, and had none-to-minimal analgesia 1 h later. The remaining volunteers received the drug while in the lateral position, and demonstrated dose-dependent analgesia in the foot 1 h later. Epidural clonidine also caused dose-dependent analgesia. The combination of neostigmine and clonidine resulted in an additive enhancement for analgesia, but no enhancement of each drug's side effects, and a reduction in clonidine-induced hypotension. Neostigmine injected into subjects in the lateral position diminished clonidine-induced reductions in blood pressure and plasma norepinephrine., Conclusion: These results support enhancement of alpha 2-adrenergic analgesia by intrathecal neostigmine, but do not demonstrate synergy, as observed in animals. Lack of enhancement of side effects suggests this combination may be clinically useful.

Background: Acetylcholine causes synthesis of nitric oxide in vascular endothelium, and presumptive evidence in vivo suggests spinally released acetylcholine causes antinociception and increased sympathetic nervous system activity via a nitric oxide mechanism. The purpose of this study was to determine, using a recently described bioassay system, whether acetylcholine stimulates nitric oxide release from spinal cord tissue in vitro., Methods: Rat thoracolumbar spinal cord slices were incubated in a tissue chamber and perfused with Krebs-Henseleit solution. The perfusate was then passed through endotheliumdenuded rat aortic rings and their tension was measured. Vascular rings were preconstricted with phenylephrine, then were exposed to spinal cord perfusate with increasing concentrations (10(-12)-10(-4)M) of acetylcholine alone or with various antagonists., Results: Acetylcholine perfusion of spinal tissue caused concentration-dependent relaxations of the aortic rings, an effect blocked by each of the muscarinic antagonists, atropine, pirenzepine, and AFDX-116. Acetylcholine-induced relaxation also was antagonized by an inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase (N-methyl-L-arginine), a nitric oxide scavenger (hemoglobin) and an inhibitor of guanylate cyclase (methylene blue)., Conclusions: These results demonstrate release of a vasorelaxant from spinal cord tissue by acetylcholine, which results from an action on muscarinic receptors and exhibits a pharmacology consistent with nitric oxide. Although precise anatomic localization of acetylcholine's action is not possible with this system, these results add to evidence that acetylcholine causes nitric oxide synthesis in the spinal cord.

Background: Nitric oxide synthase is located in the spinal cord dorsal horn and intermediolateral cell column, where it may modulate sensory and sympathetic neuronal activity. However, the biochemical characteristics of this enzyme have not been examined in these different areas in the spinal cord. Although alpha(2)-adrenergic agonists, muscarinic agonists, and nitric oxide may interact in the spinal cord to produce antinociception, these interactions have not been characterized., Methods: Sheep spinal cord tissue was homogenized ad centrifuged at high sped to separate soluble and membrane-bound fractions. Nitric oxide synthase activity was determined by conversion of [(14)C]-L-arginine to [(14)C]-L-citrulline and its kinetic characteristics, dependency on cofactors, and sensitivity to inhibitors determined. Sheep spinal cord was stained for nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate diaphorase as a marker for nitric oxide synthase. Antinociception to a mechanical stimulus from intrathecal clonidine alone and with neostigmine was determined and the effects of L-arginine and n-methyl-L-arginine were determined., Results: More than 85% of nitric oxide synthase activity was present in the soluble form and its kinetic, cofactor, and antagonist properties were similar to those of the neuronal isoform of nitric oxide synthase. Biochemical and histochemical studies localized nitric oxide synthase to the superficial dorsal horn and the intermediolateral cell column. Clonidine antinociception was enhanced by L-arginine and neostigmine, but not by D-arginine. Neostigmine's enhancement of clonidine antinociception was blocked by n-methyl-L-arginine., Conclusions: These results confirm those of previous studies demonstrating localization of nitric oxide synthase to superficial dorsal horn and intermediolateral cell column of mammalian spinal cord, and suggesting its identity as the neuronal isoform. Spinal alpha(2)-adrenergic agonist antinociception may be partly dependent on cholinergic and nitric oxide mechanisms.

Background: Pharmacokinetically designed infusions have been demonstrated to achieve rapidly and maintain desired concentrations of drug in plasma after intravenous administration. In this study we tested whether a similar approach, targeting concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), could be used with epidural administration of the alpha 2-adrenergic analgesic clonidine., Methods: After institutional review board approval and informed consent had been obtained, seven healthy volunteers received a clonidine infusion through a lower lumbar epidural catheter. Infusion of clonidine (10 micrograms/ml) was controlled by the STANPUMP program for sequential 75-min periods to targeted CSF clonidine concentrations of 25, 50, 75, and 150 ng/ml. Before reprogramming to the next higher targeted concentration, mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate were measured; blood was obtained for clonidine and catecholamine assays; and visual analog score for sedation and pain to immersion of foot and hand in ice water were obtained. CSF was collected during infusion with an indwelling lumbar intrathecal catheter and was analyzed for clonidine, catecholamines, and acetylcholine., Results: CSF clonidine concentrations rapidly increased and were maintained at steady values with the stepped infusion, although observed concentrations were consistently greater than targeted. The relation between CSF clonidine concentration and analgesia in the foot was similar to that previously observed after epidural bolus administration. Clonidine also was associated with concentration-dependent sedation; decreased mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate, and CSF norepinephrine concentration; and increased CSF acetylcholine concentration., Conclusions: This study suggests that pharmacokinetically designed infusions of drugs in the epidural space in humans can maintain steady concentrations of drug in CSF. In addition to providing a useful tool for investigation of mechanisms of action and drug interactions, this technique may improve analgesia and diminish side effects from epidurally administered analgesics.

Background: Intrathecal neostigmine may produce analgesia by itself and may enhance analgesia from spinal clonidine. Before clinical trials, the spinal cord blood flow effects of these drugs alone and in combination should be examined in animals., Methods: Conscious, nonpregnant ewes with indwelling vascular and thoracic spinal catheters received intrathecal injection of 0.2 or 2 mg neostigmine, 0.2 mg clonidine, or 2 mg neostigmine plus 0.2 mg clonidine. Mean systemic and pulmonary arterial and central venous pressures, heart rate, and cardiac output were monitored, arterial blood was sampled for blood gas tensions and pH, and spinal cord blood flow was determined by colored microsphere injection before and at 15, 60, and 240 min after spinal study drug injection., Results: Neostigmine alone did not affect cardiorespiratory variables or spinal cord blood flow. Intrathecal clonidine alone decreased systemic arterial and central venous pressures, whereas these effects were not observed with addition of neostigmine. Clonidine or neostigmine alone or the combination of clonidine and neostigmine did not affect spinal cord blood flow., Conclusions: Intrathecal neostigmine alone or in combination with clonidine does not reduce spinal cord blood flow, an important preclinical toxicity issue. These results provide additional support for initial clinical trials of intrathecal neostigmine for analgesia.

Background: Intraspinal clonidine injection produces analgesia free of respiratory depression, but also decreases blood pressure and causes sedation. Spinal neostigmine injection alone increases blood pressure in animals and enhances clonidine-induced analgesia., Methods: To test whether neostigmine would alter clonidine-induced hypotension, nine chronically prepared sheep received intrathecal injections of saline or neostigmine (150, 300, 1,000 micrograms) followed in 15 min by 200 micrograms clonidine., Results: Clonidine plus saline decreased mean arterial pressure by 12 +/- 3% associated with small, statistically nonsignificant decreases in heart rate, cardiac output, and systemic vascular resistance. Prior injection of neostigmine diminished hypotension 60 min after clonidine injection in a dose-dependent manner. To further define the time course and pharmacology of this interaction, seven other sheep received intrathecal saline, neostigmine (1,000 micrograms), or neostigmine plus methylatropine (1,000 micrograms) 75 min prior to 200 micrograms clonidine. With this longer interval between injections, neostigmine abolished clonidine-induced hypotension, and this protective effect was inhibited by methylatropine. To test whether rostral spread of neostigmine in cerebrospinal fluid would alter its hemodynamic effects, we injected intrathecal neostigmine into the upper cervical site. Intrathecal neostigmine increased mean arterial pressure and heart rate at this site to a degree similar to that in the thoracic area, with no effect on behavioral or arterial blood gas tensions., Conclusions: These data are consistent with neostigmine's counteraction of clonidine-induced hypotension by a spinal muscarinic mechanism and support investigation of spinal alpha 2-adrenergic-cholinergic combinations for pain therapy.

Intraspinally administered alpha 2-adrenergic agonists are being examined for postoperative analgesia, yet their effects on the hemodynamic response to acute hemorrhage have not been examined. In this study chronically prepared conscious sheep received thoracic intrathecal saline or clonidine 300 micrograms followed in 15 min by rapid removal of 1,000 ml blood. In saline-treated ewes blood pressure was maintained and heart rate steadily increased during hemorrhage of up to 700 ml blood, with further blood removal resulting in rapid decreases in both variables. In contrast, heart rate never increased and blood pressure was maintained only up to 400 ml blood loss in animals receiving intrathecal clonidine. Compared to saline controls, clonidine did not alter blood pressure or heart rate at the end of hemorrhage or during blood pressure restitution during the next hour. Clonidine inhibited the increase in plasma epinephrine at the end of hemorrhage without altering plasma norepinephrine, vasopressin, renin, or atrial natriuretic factor. Intrathecal idazoxan, a specific alpha 2-adrenergic antagonist, reversed clonidine's effect on blood pressure during hemorrhage. Intravenous DG-5128, a poorly lipid-soluble alpha 2-adrenergic antagonist, also reversed clonidine's effect and additionally completely blocked any reduction in blood pressure and heart rate during hemorrhage. These data suggest that intrathecal clonidine interferes with maintenance of blood pressure during hemorrhage, likely because of a spinal sympatholytic effect, but does not affect the ultimate decrease in blood pressure after rapid removal of 1,000 ml blood. This difference in effect during the two phases of hemorrhage can be explained by the relative importance of the sympathetic nervous system in each.

Sensitivity to the vasoconstricting actions of adrenergic agents is altered during pregnancy and is drug-, regional vascular bed-, and endothelium-dependent. To examine whether the uterine perfusion-sparing property of ephedrine is due to local actions, we examined the effects in vitro of ephedrine and the alpha-adrenergic agonist metaraminol (10(-10)-10(-3) M) in uterine and femoral vessels, with and without functional endothelium, from nonpregnant and pregnant ewes. Both agents produced dose-dependent contractions in all vascular rings. In all cases metaraminol was more potent (by analysis of the concentration producing a 50% maximal response [EC50]) and efficacious (by maximal effect). Pregnancy increased constriction from both agents in femoral arterial rings, whereas pregnancy decreased constriction from both agents in uterine arterial rings. However, the ratio of maximal effect at femoral versus uterine rings during pregnancy was greater for ephedrine (5.2 +/- 0.6) than metaraminol (1.9 +/- 0.3). This difference was further accentuated by endothelium removal. Constriction to both agents was abolished by phentolamine (10(-5) M). These data suggest that both ephedrine and metaraminol constrict uterine and systemic vessels by actions on alpha adrenoceptors, and that ephedrine may spare uterine perfusion during pregnancy due to more selective constriction of systemic vessels than that caused by metaraminol.

Intrathecally administered alpha 2-adrenergic agonists produce analgesia in humans but may also produce hypotension and bradycardia. To further characterize hemodynamic depression produced by intrathecally administered alpha 2-adrenergic agonists, clonidine (100-1,500 micrograms) was injected into the cervical, thoracic, or lumbar intrathecal space of conscious sheep. Only thoracic intrathecal clonidine injection (100 or 300 micrograms) decreased blood pressure, whereas these doses did not affect blood pressure when injected at other sites. A greater clonidine dose (1,500 micrograms) increased blood pressure to a similar degree at all sites. Hypotension after thoracic intrathecal clonidine injection was inhibited by pretreatment with the alpha 2-adrenergic antagonist idazoxan (1 mg, intrathecally) or the depleter of acetylcholine stores hemicholinium-3 (2 mg, intrathecally), suggesting an action at alpha 2-adrenoceptors on cholinergic preganglionic sympathetic neurons. ST-91, a polar clonidine analog, did not decrease blood pressure after thoracic intrathecal injection. Intrathecal injection of the muscarinic receptor agonist carbamylcholine increased blood pressure. These data describe a complex action of intrathecal alpha 2-adrenergic agonists on hemodynamic parameters that is dependent on site of injection, drug dose, and drug lipophilicity; that can be explained by anatomic factors; and that may possibly be exploited to minimize hemodynamic depression from these agents.