Search

Objective: We investigated the long-term results of autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells (ABMMNCs) implantation in patients with Buerger's disease (BD)., Methods: Twenty-eight patients (25 males and 3 females) who had BD and critical unilateral limb ischemia were investigated between April 2003 and August 2005. The patients were administered multiple injections of CD34+ and CD45+ positive ABMMNCs into the gastrocnemius muscle, the intermetatarsal region, and the dorsum of the foot (n=26) or forearm (n=2) and saline injection into the contralateral limb., Results: The mean follow-up time was 139.6±10.5 months. No complication related to stem cell therapy was observed during the follow-up. The ankle-brachial pressure index evaluated at 6 months and 120 months was compared to the baseline scores (p<0.001 and p=0.021, respectively). Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was performed for all patients at baseline, 6 months, and 120 months. The angiographic improvement was 78.5% and 57.1% at 6 and 120 months, respectively. Patients demonstrated a significant improvement in the quality of life parameters at 6 months compared to baseline (p=0.008) and 120 months compared to the baseline (p=0.009). The 10-year amputation-free rate was 96% (95% CI=0.71-1) in ABMMNC-implanted limbs and 93% (95% CI=0.33-0.94) in saline-injected limbs (p=1)., Conclusion: Autologous stem cell therapy could be an alternative therapeutic method for BD at long-term follow-up.

Objective: All innovations in cardiac surgery provide us with new techniques to perform surgery through smaller incisions with less invasive and best cosmetic results. After promising results in minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS), pain and cosmetic appearance became important end points, especially for female patients. In the current study, we intended to evaluate the surgical results and cosmetic satisfaction with the periareolar and submammary incision types in cardiac surgery., Methods: Ninety-four female patients underwent MICS between July 2013 and March 2018. MICS was performed in 62 patients via periareolar incision and in 32 patients via submammarian incision. We investigated the incision size, wound infection, pain levels by using a postoperative standard pain-level questionnaire, the postoperative scar size, and patient satisfaction using a postoperative patient questionnaire., Results: Periareolar incision size was smaller than the submammary incision (Group A: 5.6±0.6 vs. Group B: 6.7±0.8, p=0.001). Four patients from Group B had superficial wound infection (p=0.01). Patients who underwent MICS via periareolar incision and submammary incision had similar pain level (p=0.2). The scar tissue was smaller in size and postoperatively healed better in the following days for the patients with periareolar incision due to the elastic structure of breast tissue. (Group A: 4.3±0.4 vs. Group B: 5.3±0.2, p=0.001)., Conclusion: Our study suggests that the periareolar approach would be more aesthetic, show better healing, and have a smaller scar size in female patients.