1. Observations on different resin strategies for affinity purification mass spectrometry of a tagged protein
- Author
-
Wilna J. Moree, Steven J. Bark, William R. Widger, Morgan Mitchell, and Sujina Mali
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Recombinant Fusion Proteins ,Biophysics ,Peptide ,Biochemistry ,Antibodies ,Chromatography, Affinity ,Mass Spectrometry ,Dynabeads ,03 medical and health sciences ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,FLAG-tag ,Affinity chromatography ,Bacterial Proteins ,Humans ,Staphylococcal Protein A ,Molecular Biology ,chemistry.chemical_classification ,Tandem affinity purification ,Chromatography ,030102 biochemistry & molecular biology ,biology ,Chemistry ,Cell Biology ,030104 developmental biology ,HEK293 Cells ,biology.protein ,Agarose ,Protein G ,Protein A - Abstract
Co-affinity purification mass spectrometry (CoAP-MS) is a highly effective method for identifying protein complexes from a biological sample and inferring important interactions, but the impact of the solid support is usually not considered in design of such experiments. Affinity purification (AP) experiments typically utilize a bait protein expressing a peptide tag such as FLAG, c-Myc, HA or V5 and high affinity antibodies to these peptide sequences to facilitate isolation of a bait protein to co-purify interacting proteins. We observed significant variability for isolation of tagged bait proteins between Protein A/G Agarose, Protein G Dynabeads, and AminoLink resins. While previous research identified the importance of tag sequence and their location, crosslinking procedures, reagents, dilution, and detergent concentrations, the effect of the resin itself has not been considered. Our data suggest the type of solid support is important and, under the conditions of our experiments, AminoLink resin provided a more robust solid-support platform for AP-MS.
- Published
- 2016