Search

With recent evolution of cannabis legalization around the world and multiplication of cannabis derived products, identifying and qualifying cannabis consumption has a proven interest. Although blood, plasma, and urine are common matrices widely used in toxicology laboratories, oral fluid presents specific advantages. In the context of doping tests, addiction consultation or roadside checks, where other matrices are impractical to collect or can be adulterated, oral fluid is a promising matrix that allows a non-invasive, rapid, and monitored self-sampling. However, available devices required a consequent volume of oral fluid, more than 250 µL, sometimes difficult to collect. We present here a fully optimized quantitative method for seven cannabinoids, including four metabolites, in oral fluid, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol, 11-hydroxy-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and 11-nor-9-carboxy-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol; cannabidiol, 7-hydroxy and 7-carboxycannabidiol; and cannabinol. After self-collection of 20 µL using an accurate and precise volumetric absorptive microsampling device (VAMS ® ), cannabinoids were derivatized with 2-fluoro-1-methylpyridinium p-toluenesulfonate to increase sensitivity. The successive steps of the proposed method, including biosampling, 1 h sample preparation with derivatization, and acquisition by ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry, were fully optimized. A limit of quantification of 0.5 ng/mL (≈10 pg per sampling) was thus targeted, adapted to the legal threshold required by the authorities and to clinical monitoring. Applied to six cannabis consumers, the proposed method made it possible to quantify in 20 µL oral fluid samples, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol ranging from 0.5 to 6236 ng/mL, cannabidiol from 0.6 to 190 ng/mL and cannabinol from 0.5 to 118 ng/mL., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethics approval: The observational study was conducted in accordance with ethical guidelines established in the Declaration of Helsinki and the French legislation. Our ethics internal review board examined and approved the study design in a meeting on August 4 2023. The decision mentioned that the study did not fell within the scope of Loi Jardé (arrêté du 3 mai 2017 fixant la liste des recherches mentionnées au 2° de l’article L. 1121–1 du code de la santé publique) because it was a secondary analysis of a previous collection. The previously collected urinary and salivary samples were collected in non-treatment seeking healthy volunteers, who gave a written informed consent and were recruited among University of Paris students by word of mouth. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all volunteers. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature.)

Oral fluid (OF) is an alternative biological matrix for monitoring cannabis intake in drug testing, and drugged driving (DUID) programs, but OF cannabinoid test interpretation is challenging. Controlled cannabinoid administration studies provide a scientific database for interpreting cannabinoid OF tests. We compared differences in OF cannabinoid concentrations from 19 h before to 30 h after smoking a 6.8% THC cigarette in chronic frequent and occasional cannabis smokers. OF was collected with the Statsure Saliva Sampler™ OF device. 2D-GC-MS was used to quantify cannabinoids in 357 OF specimens; 65 had inadequate OF volume within 3 h after smoking. All OF specimens were THC-positive for up to 13.5 h after smoking, without significant differences between frequent and occasional smokers over 30 h. Cannabidiol (CBD) and cannabinol (CBN) had short median last detection times (2.5-4 h for CBD and 6-8 h for CBN) in both groups. THCCOOH was detected in 25 and 212 occasional and frequent smokers' OF samples, respectively. THCCOOH provided longer detection windows than THC in all frequent smokers. As THCCOOH is not present in cannabis smoke, its presence in OF minimizes the potential for false positive results from passive environmental smoke exposure, and can identify oral THC ingestion, while OF THC cannot. THC ≥ 1 μg/L, in addition to CBD ≥ 1 μg/L or CBN ≥ 1 μg/L suggested recent cannabis intake (≤13.5 h), important for DUID cases, whereas THC ≥ 1 μg/L or THC ≥ 2 μg/L cutoffs had longer detection windows (≥30 h), important for workplace testing. THCCOOH windows of detection for chronic, frequent cannabis smokers extended beyond 30 h, while they were shorter (0-24 h) for occasional cannabis smokers.