Search

Background: In order to improve perioperative subjective quality of care it seems desirable to shorten preoperative fasting times as much as possible within acceptable safety limits. These efforts should result in a measurable reduction of preoperative thirst and hunger as well as in improvements of patient well-being. It is unknown to what extent preoperative patient comfort is limited by thirst and hunger from a patient point of view. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of a traditional fasting regimen on preoperative patient discomfort., Patients and Methods: We conducted a survey on preoperative thirst and hunger in 412 adult American Society of Anesthesiologists ASA I and II patients scheduled for minor elective surgery., Results: Of the patients 33% complained of moderate to strong thirst, whereas 19% had moderate to strong hunger, 47% of the participants would have liked to have been able to drink and 72% would have appreciated a light breakfast before surgery. Mean preoperative fasting times were 12.8+/-3.4 h for fluids and 15.5+/-4.4 h for solids. "Thirst" was named by 3.3% and "hunger" by 0.8% of patients as the most important factor for preoperative discomfort but "long wait" (8.5%), "tenseness" (6.5%) and "anxiety" (4.8%) were the most frequently named factors. Answers were independent of the duration of preoperative fasting., Conclusion: Patient comfort is compromised by traditional fasting rules and liberalization of these policies is desired by patients. However, efforts to reduce preoperative anxiety and tenseness might have an additional, important potential to improve perioperative quality of care from a patient's perspective.

Background: This prospective survey aimed at elucidating the patients' expectations and needs regarding the pre-anaesthetic visit and the forthcoming anaesthesia. The same questionnaire was answered by both patients and anaesthesiologists., Methods: A total of 200 ASA I-III patients were interviewed prior to the preoperative anaesthetic visit. The questionnaire consisted of the topics preoperative affective situation, information and self-estimation of anaesthesia knowledge, expectations regarding the pre-anaesthetic visit/anaesthesia and extent of information concerning the perioperative course including risk and possible complications. The same questionnaire was presented to 35 certified anaesthesiologists with the request to estimate the patients' answers. Answers were rated using a Likert-scale, a comparison of patients' and anaesthesiologists' replies was performed., Results: For all 5 topics considerable differences between patients' answers and anaesthesiologists' rating were found (e.g. for the assessment of the affective situation, the relevance of family physicians as information source, the desired anaesthetic technique or the extent of anaesthesia-related risk information). No differences were observed for the importance of an anaesthesiologist as information source and fear reduction by the pre-anaesthetic visit., Conclusions: Anaesthesiologists tend to misinterpret many patients' expectations and attitudes. The results demonstrate the potential for quality improvement of the pre-anaesthetic visit.

Complete atrioventricular block occurred during spinal and subsequent general anaesthesia in a 74-year-old patient with known arterial hypertension but without heart conduction abnormality. Drug therapy and intermittent transcutaneous pacing was successful. A decrease of arterial pressure by more than 40% preceded the heart blockade in the course of both events. Subsequent cardiologic examination revealed evidence of a discrete hypertensive heart disease. Relative ischemia of the atrioventricular region during anaesthesia was suggested as an aetiology. When the patient presented for the next operation, again general anaesthesia was applied, and invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring as well as catecholamine support were used and no further atrioventricular blockade occurred. The case demonstrates the possible recurrence of an intraoperative complete atrioventricular blockade in an older patient without pre-existing conduction abnormalities and only minor signs of heart disease, irrespective of the anaesthesia technique. Under these circumstances transcutaneous pacing should always be in place. Maintenance of coronary perfusion pressure is essential and invasive blood pressure monitoring is recommended.