Search

Background: The implementation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation tool (CPOT) in intensive care units (ICU) has been associated with more frequent pain assessments, a reduced number of complications, and improved administration of analgesics and sedatives. So far no German translation exists. Translating this tool into foreign languages requires further validation testing.Objective: The aim of this prospective observational validation study was to translate the original version of the CPOT according to scientific principles for translation and to establish the validity and reliability of the German translation of CPOT for critically ill adult patients.Material and Methods: A total of 292 cardiac surgery patients from 2 ICUs of 2 German university teaching hospitals were included (114 patients at center 1 and 178 patients at center 2). Of the included patients 22.6% were female and 76.4% were male with a mean age of 68.5 years ±9.3 SD. Pain was evaluated with the CPOT, the Bhavioral Pain Scale (BPS) and with the Numeric Rating scale (NRS) at three time points (1. intubated + sedated, 2. intubated + awake, 3. extubated + awake) at rest and during nociceptive stimulus (positioning). Assessments were made separately by trained physicians and nursing staff.Results: Good results for interrater reliability and internal consistency could be demonstrated (weighted Cohen's kappa of 0.73, Cronbach's coefficient alpha of 0.8). Spearman correlation between CPOT and NRS was moderate but significant. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to obtain optimal thresholds of CPOT to detect pain revealed different results during rest and stimulus and in intubated and extubated patients.Conclusion: The validated German CPOT translation is a reliable tool for pain assessment in cardiac ICU patients in the absence of patients' ability for self-reporting. The use of this German version of CPOT now allows a better international comparability of corresponding data in future studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: In 2005 the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) published the new guidelines for Advanced Life Support (ALS). One of the aims was to reduce the no flow time (NFT), without chest compression in the first period of cardiac arrest. Furthermore the guidelines recommend that endotracheal intubation should only be carried out by personnel experienced in this procedure.Methods: An attempt was made to evaluate whether the use of the laryngeal tube suction (LTS-D) for emergency airway management could contribute to reduce NFT compared to bag-mask ventilation (BMV). In a randomised prospective study 50 participants were asked to perform standardised simulated cardiac arrest management on a full-scale simulator following a one-day cardiac arrest training. Each participant was randomised into the LTS-D and the BMV group for airway management. At the end of each scenario an evaluation of the use of each ventilation procedure by the participants was made by means of a questionnaire.Results: During the manikin scenario (430 s for LTS-D and 420 s for BMV) there was a significant difference in the overall NFT comparing the use of the LTS-D vs. BMV (105.8 s, range 94-124 s vs. 150.7 s, range 124-179 s; p<0.01). This corresponded during the whole scenario to a proportion of 24.6% (LTS-D) or 35.9% (BMV). Using the LTS-D all participants were able to ventilate the manikin successfully (tidal volume 500-600 ml). In a subjective evaluation of the different airway management procedures by the participants more than 90% expressed a positive opinion about the LTS-D with respect to ease of insertion and safety of ventilation.Conclusion: The use of the LTS-D on a manikin by emergency physicians after standardised cardiac arrest training significantly reduces the NFT in comparison to BMV. Therefore the LTS-D seems to be a good alternative to BMV during a simulated cardiac arrest scenario. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A paediatric emergency case with a rescue helicopter, which was reported as unexpected cardiac arrest of a 4-year-old child will be described. Based on this case, the symptoms and therapy of meningococcal sepsis and Waterhouse-Friderichsen-Syndrome under emergency conditions will be discussed as well as aspects of post-exposure prophylaxis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the medical literature the Lazarus phenomenon is defined as the spontaneous return of circulation (SROC) after cessation of cardio-pulmonary resuscitation. Based on published literature recommendations concerning the treatment of patients after cessation of resuscitation and reasons for the Lazarus phenomenon are discussed. A literature search in Medline, PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar and Google from 1982 to 2009 was carried out for the terms “Lazarus phenomenon”, “cessation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC)”, “spontaneous return of circulation (SROC)”, “resuscitation and spontaneous defibrillation”, “spontaneous recovery and cardiopulmonary resuscitation”. Related secondary literature which was cited in the relevant articles was included as well as publications found in our personal literature base. More than 10,000 articles and comments could be recovered and of these 45 were considered to be medically relevant articles (letters to the Editor, abstracts, case reports and literature reviews). In the relevant medical literature, the Lazarus phenomenon is a rare occurrence. It seems to be a phenomenon which has often been described in non-medical literature but not published in medical literature. The pathophysiological mechanisms are poorly understood. In the literature several mechanisms are discussed which could be important for this phenomenon, e.g. autopositive end-expiratory pressure, hyperventilation and alkalosis, hyperkalemia, delayed action of drugs and unobserved minimal vital signs. In the literature it is recommended that patients should be passively monitored for at least 10 min after cessation of resuscitation. However, more scientific experimental investigations seem to be necessary to gain a better understanding of this phenomenon. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In the medical literature the Lazarus phenomenon is defined as the spontaneous return of circulation (SROC) after cessation of cardio-pulmonary resuscitation. Based on published literature recommendations concerning the treatment of patients after cessation of resuscitation and reasons for the Lazarus phenomenon are discussed.Methods: A literature search in Medline, PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar and Google from 1982 to 2009 was carried out for the terms "Lazarus phenomenon", "cessation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC)", "spontaneous return of circulation (SROC)", "resuscitation and spontaneous defibrillation", "spontaneous recovery and cardiopulmonary resuscitation". Related secondary literature which was cited in the relevant articles was included as well as publications found in our personal literature base.Results: More than 10,000 articles and comments could be recovered and of these 45 were considered to be medically relevant articles (letters to the Editor, abstracts, case reports and literature reviews).Conclusions: In the relevant medical literature, the Lazarus phenomenon is a rare occurrence. It seems to be a phenomenon which has often been described in non-medical literature but not published in medical literature. The pathophysiological mechanisms are poorly understood. In the literature several mechanisms are discussed which could be important for this phenomenon, e.g. autopositive end-expiratory pressure, hyperventilation and alkalosis, hyperkalemia, delayed action of drugs and unobserved minimal vital signs. In the literature it is recommended that patients should be passively monitored for at least 10 min after cessation of resuscitation. However, more scientific experimental investigations seem to be necessary to gain a better understanding of this phenomenon. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Palliative medicine has progressed during recent years to an independent medical faculty within the German health system. Despite this development palliative care systems for out-of-hospital and in-hospital palliative care are still insufficient in Germany so that the development of necessary resources must be considered as not yet completed. To support the further national development palliative medicine can be temporarily or permanently coupled to existing departments, which can be advantageous for all concerned and last but not least be profitable to patients and their relatives. Possibilities for participation of anaesthesiologists in this area of medical care are discussed in the study reported here. Anaesthesiologists have always historically been represented in palliative medical departments, e.g. as pain specialists. In the following investigation the special possibilities of anaesthesia departments for supporting the education and development of in-hospital and out-of hospital palliative medical care departments are reported. Previous experience of co-operation between these two departments is well established. Departments of palliative medicine depend on a well working interdisciplinary co-operation between different medical disciplines (e.g. anaesthesiology, radiotherapy, surgery and oncology) and several medical professions (e.g. physicians, nurses, psychologists). The aim of palliative care therapy is to be responsible for the best possible therapy for cancer patients and to give support to their care-giving relatives. Due to the increasing establishment of palliative care procedures in Germany, departments of anaesthesiology should actively take part in the further development. Part of the responsibility of most anaesthesia departments is to practice pain management and critical care medicine, which are reasons why anaesthesiologists are predestined to be part of the system for palliative care patients and their relatives. Anaesthesia departments can be responsible for the organization of in-hospital and out-of-hospital palliative medicine and palliative care. The integration of anaesthesiological expertise into palliative medicine departments and vice versa can be a great opportunity for both medical departments and therefore represents a worthwhile engagement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Palliative medicine has progressed during recent years to an independent medical faculty within the German health system. Despite this development palliative care systems for out-of-hospital and in-hospital palliative care are still insufficient in Germany so that the development of necessary resources must be considered as not yet completed. To support the further national development palliative medicine can be temporarily or permanently coupled to existing departments, which can be advantageous for all concerned and last but not least be profitable to patients and their relatives. Possibilities for participation of anaesthesiologists in this area of medical care are discussed in the study reported here. Anaesthesiologists have always historically been represented in palliative medical departments, e.g. as pain specialists. In the following investigation the special possibilities of anaesthesia departments for supporting the education and development of in-hospital and out-of hospital palliative medical care departments are reported. Previous experience of co-operation between these two departments is well established. Departments of palliative medicine depend on a well working interdisciplinary co-operation between different medical disciplines (e.g. anaesthesiology, radiotherapy, surgery and oncology) and several medical professions (e.g. physicians, nurses, psychologists). The aim of palliative care therapy is to be responsible for the best possible therapy for cancer patients and to give support to their care-giving relatives. Due to the increasing establishment of palliative care procedures in Germany, departments of anaesthesiology should actively take part in the further development. Part of the responsibility of most anaesthesia departments is to practice pain management and critical care medicine, which are reasons why anaesthesiologists are predestined to be part of the system for palliative care patients and their relatives. Anaesthesia departments can be responsible for the organization of in-hospital and out-of-hospital palliative medicine and palliative care. The integration of anaesthesiological expertise into palliative medicine departments and vice versa can be a great opportunity for both medical departments and therefore represents a worthwhile engagement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Prehospital emergency teams will be confronted with the specific needs of resuscitation in palliative patients in whom a return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) could be found significantly less frequently than in other emergency situations. The present investigation aims to show medical and judicial problems related to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), external examination of the corpse and death certification., Methods: Over a 12-month period all emergency cases involving physicians in an out-of-hospital resuscitation setting in cancer patients were retrospectively analysed for indications for emergency call, situation on-site and prehospital treatment by emergency physicians, external examination of the corpse and determination of death., Results: For the period mentioned 164 (2.7% of the total) emergency calls by cancer patients or their relatives were identified. In the following study 43 patients (26.2%) could be included. In 20 cases (46.5%) the emergency physicians attempted to resuscitate the patient by performing CPR. In the majority of cases (36; 83.7%) death certification and external examination of the corpse were necessary at the scene., Conclusions: Due to a reduced rate of ROSC in palliative patients, death certification and external examination of the corpse are more often necessary than in other emergency situations. Therefore every emergency physician should be familiar with the ethics of resuscitation of patients in palliative care and with external examination of the corpse to do justice to patients and their caregivers.

A case is presented of spontaneous return of circulation after cardiac arrest in a patient with a pacemaker without intraoperative resuscitation. In the literature this kind of situation is called the Lazarus phenomenon. Cardiac arrest of the patient occurred during surgery and because of the poor prognosis no cardiopulmonary resuscitation was initiated. After 6 min of apnoea and cessation of circulation, the circulation restarted spontaneously and surgery was continued. Afterwards the patient was transferred to the intensive care unit but died 2 days later without regaining consciousness. The pathophysiological mechanisms for the Lazarus phenomenon are poorly understood but several mechanisms and multifactorial events are discussed in the literature.

Treatment of patients suffering from decompensated chronic pulmonary disease (COPD) not responding to pharmacological therapy is still a major challenge in intensive care medicine. Administration of volatile anaesthetics may be a therapy of last resort in these cases. We report on a 65-year-old woman suffering from exacerbated COPD, who could not be sufficiently ventilated despite comprehensive pharmacological therapy. In order to administer a volatile anaesthetic in the ICU, we employed the "Anaesthetic Conserving Device" (AnaConDa) consisting of a vaporizer chamber embedded in a charcoal filter system. With this device, every standard intensive care ventilator can be used to deliver volatile anaesthetics in a safe and economic manner. The AnaConDa converts the open breathing system of the intensive care ventilator into a de facto half-closed system. The very low pulmonary compliance of the patient increased dramatically after administration of 0.75 vol% halothane for 48 h (27 vs. 150 ml/mbar). Elimination of CO(2) was improved and weaning from controlled ventilation was achieved. After surgical removal of a pulmonary abscess and a total of 78 days of intensive care therapy, the patient was discharged in good health.

Background: Presently and even more in the near future more cancer patients will be treated at home especially in the final stage of their disease. For this reason the prehospital emergency system will be confronted with the specific needs of these patients. Palliative care is not part of the German model of post-graduate training regulations for emergency medicine and palliative care teams (PCT) are only involved in the treatment of cancer patients in emergency situations., Methods: Over a 12-month period we retrospectively analysed all emergency cases that had been categorised as final cancer stage at 2 emergency sites (one air-based, the other ground-based) involving physicians in an out-of-hospital setting. We analysed all cases for indications of emergency call, prehospital treatment and involvement of a PCT in the treatment of symptoms., Results: For this period we analysed 2,765 emergency documents and identified more than 2.5% as emergency calls by cancer patients or their relatives (the majority of patients had been in the final stage of the disease). Most emergency calls occurred at times when no general practitioner was on duty and acute dyspnoea (42.7%) was the prominent diagnosis. After emergency treatment 61.8% patients had been admitted to hospital. In most settings a PCT was not involved in the treatment of palliative care patients or their relatives (92.7%)., Conclusions: Our data demonstrate that care of cancer patients in the final stage of the disease is relevant in emergency medicine. These patients are in need of help based on principles of palliative care. Under these circumstances cooperation of the medical disciplines (emergency and palliative medicine) concerned seems to be necessary. This may increase the possibility for patients to stay at home for the last days of their life. Because of this we are convinced that basic knowledge of palliative care should be integrated into the German model of post-graduate training regulations for emergency care. Combining parts of the curricula (palliative and emergency medicine) it would be possible for emergency physicians to guide their treatment by the ideas and strategies of palliative care. But we are also convinced that the system of PCT should increase and become more involved in prehospital care in emergency cases of palliative care patients.

We report about an emergency case of a female patient with terminal carcinoma of the ovary. On the basis of this case it becomes evident that palliative care questions are also important in emergency medicine. In this situation cooperation of the medical disciplines involved appears urgently necessary. This may allow the possibility for terminally ill patients to stay at home in the last days of life.