Search

Paediatric anaesthetists are at higher risk of exposure to waste anaesthetic gases, which often exceed set safety limits. Recommended personal diffusive sampling techniques for monitoring exposure to waste anaesthetic gases may not give a true profile of exposure and hence biological sampling may also be necessary. We evaluated the exposure of paediatric anaesthetists to nitrous oxide and sevoflurane as assessed by personal environmental and biological samples. The influence of venue and technique, and the strength of the relationship among the various sampling techniques were analysed. The study found that exposure to nitrous oxide during paediatric anaesthetic inductions is still a major problem, although exposure to sevoflurane was usually within the accepted limits. The type of breathing system used and the presence of scavenging seem to influence this exposure, though surprisingly, the induction technique or the methods of airway control do not. No significant relationship was found between the various biological indicators measured.

Twelve volunteers known to have airways that responded adversely to 2.0 MAC desflurane were recruited. Each volunteer inhaled three single breaths of each of 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 MAC of sevoflurane, halothane, isoflurane, desflurane and balance air, with breaths of air between, whilst breathing nasally through a face mask attached to one of three filters that provided three different levels of humidification. The incidence of any adverse airway events was recorded. The anaesthetic inhaled significantly affected the incidence of adverse airway events (p < 0.001), with the least to most irritant being sevoflurane, halothane, isoflurane and desflurane. Increasing the concentration of anaesthetic also significantly increased the incidence of adverse airway events (p < 0.001). The filter used, and hence the level of humidification, did not affect the incidence of adverse airway events (p = 0.09), but repeated exposure caused a significant reduction in the incidence of adverse airway events (p < 0.001).

Where practicable, exposure to a hazardous substance should be eliminated or adequately controlled. A postal questionnaire survey was sent to 10% of consultants from the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland, to identify the level of use of nitrous oxide in current anaesthetic practice and identify any change of practice over the last 5 years. Details of anaesthetic practice were requested in three areas: nitrous oxide usage, availability of medical air on anaesthetic machines and the use of total intravenous anaesthesia. Replies were received from 320 consultants (75%). Of these, 49% felt that, over the last 5 years, their use of nitrous oxide had decreased. Twenty per cent of anaesthetists felt that there should be some restriction in availability of nitrous oxide. Where medical air was available, 32% felt that they would use it frequently. A total of 263 (83%) stated that they use total intravenous anaesthesia to some extent. The results showed that, although 49% of consultant anaesthetists had reduced their use of nitrous oxide, this was due to medical considerations rather than concerns over health and pollution issues arising from the use of nitrous oxide.

This prospective, randomised double-blinded study was designed to assess the analgesic efficacy and occurrence of nausea when tramadol is added to a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug to provide analgesia following day-case third molar teeth extraction. All patients received oral diclofenac pre-operatively and one of four treatments intra-operatively: fentanyl and metoclopramide, tramadol and metoclopramide, fentanyl and ondansetron, or tramadol and ondansetron. There were no significant differences between groups in scores for pain in the early postoperative period. However, there were significant differences in nausea scores at this time, with the fentanyl-ondansetron group having the lowest and the tramadol-ondansetron group having the highest scores. There were no significant differences in the incidence of pain or nausea in the following 24 h. We conclude that the addition of tramadol to diclofenac results in no useful improvement in analgesic effect, and that the use of ondansetron fails to reduce the nausea associated with tramadol.

Twelve volunteers known to have airways that responded adversely to 2.0 MAC desflurane were recruited. Each volunteer inhaled three single breaths of each of 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 MAC of sevoflurane, halothane, isoflurane, desflurane and balance air, with breaths of air between, whilst breathing nasally through a face mask attached to one of three filters that provided three different levels of humidification. The incidence of any adverse airway events was recorded. The anaesthetic inhaled significantly affected the incidence of adverse airway events (p0.001), with the least to most irritant being sevoflurane, halothane, isoflurane and desflurane. Increasing the concentration of anaesthetic also significantly increased the incidence of adverse airway events (p0.001). The filter used, and hence the level of humidification, did not affect the incidence of adverse airway events (p = 0.09), but repeated exposure caused a significant reduction in the incidence of adverse airway events (p0.001).