Search

Some authors report that patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy have fewer lymph nodes harvested during axillary dissection and more dissections with < 10 nodes compared with patients who undergo surgery initially. We sought to determine whether there was a difference between these patient groups in terms of number of nodes harvested and number of dissections with < 10 nodes. Retrospective review of 258 patients diagnosed with breast cancer who underwent an axillary lymph node dissection between July 1, 2015, and December 31, 2017 was performed. Chi-squared test was used to assess differences between patient groups. Of 258 patients undergoing dissection, 48 per cent received neoadjuvant chemotherapy; 52 per cent underwent surgery as first therapeutic intervention. Mean number of nodes resected; 14.3 + 6.3 for patients with no prior chemotherapy versus 14.9 + 6.6 for patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy ( P = 0.48). For patients undergoing surgery as first intervention, 21 per cent had < 10 nodes harvested. For patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 20 per cent had < 10 nodes harvested. Patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy showed no statistically significant difference in the number of lymph nodes harvested during axillary dissection compared with patients undergoing surgery as first intervention. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not reduce the node harvest at the time of axillary dissection.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) reduces tumor size, facilitating the use of breast conservation surgery (BCS). However, mastectomy remains the surgical outcome for certain women. The goal of this study was to determine the rationale for mastectomy after NAC, particularly in women eligible for BCS. Retrospective data were reviewed on patients who received NAC between February 2006 and August 2010 at our institution. Demographics and tumor characteristics were compared between patients who received BCS and mastectomy after NAC. Of 149 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 102 (68%) underwent BCS and 47 (32%) underwent mastectomy. Patient preference was the most common rationale for mastectomy (n = 19; 40%), followed by extent of disease (n = 13; 28%), presence of a breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA) mutation (n = 9; 19%), persistent positive margins (n = 5; 11%), and wound complications (n = 1; 2%). Of the 47 patients who underwent mastectomy, 37 (79%) were eligible for BCS after NAC. Larger pathologic tumor size (2.05 vs 1.25 cm, P = 0.04) and lobular histology [invasive lobular carcinomas, n = 12/17 (70%) vs invasive ductal carcinomas, n = 36/133 (27%); P < 0.01] were associated with increased rate of mastectomy. After NAC, patient preference, extent of disease, and the presence of a BRCA mutation account for the vast majority of mastectomies. Interestingly, most of these patients were shown to be candidates for breast conservation. This highlights the importance of educating patients about their surgical choice and the lack of evidence, showing a benefit to more extensive surgery.

Genetic testing is important for comprehensive cancer care. Commercial analysis of the BRCA1/2 genes has been available since 1996, and testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome is well established. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines identify individuals for whom BRCA1/2 analysis is appropriate and define management recommendations for mutation carriers. Despite recommendations, not all who meet NCCN criteria undergo genetic testing. We assess the frequency that individuals meeting NCCN criteria decline BRCA1/2 analysis, as well as factors that affect the decision-making process. A retrospective chart review was performed from September 2013 through August 2014 of individuals who received genetic counseling at the Levine Cancer Institute. A total of 1082 individuals identified through the retrospective chart review met NCCN criteria for BRCA1/2 analysis. Of these, 267 (24.7%) did not pursue genetic testing. Of the Nontested cohort, 59 (22.1%) were disinterested in testing and 108 (40.4%) were advised to gather additional genetic or medical information about their relatives before testing. The remaining 100 (37.5%) individuals were insured and desired to undergo genetic testing but were prohibited by the expense. Eighty five of these 100 patients were responsible for the total cost of the test, whereas the remaining 15 faced a prohibitive copay expense. Financial concerns are a major deterrent to the pursuit of BRCA1/2 analysis among those who meet NCNN criteria, especially in patients diagnosed with breast or ovarian cancer. These findings highlight the need to address financial concerns for genetic testing in this high-risk population.

We describe our experience in a patient with a congenital solitary kidney encased by a perirenal liposarcoma managed by nephron-sparing excision. The best predictor of survival with liposarcoma is complete resection of the tumor. Generally a diffuse peri-renal liposarcoma arising within Gerota's fascia would necessitate a radical nephrectomy. Having a congenitally solitary kidney, this patient refused nephrectomy, therefore a kidney-sparing excision of his liposarcoma was attempted. To obtain negative margins and to provide a nephron-sparing excision, the capsule of the kidney was resected with the mass. Direct extension into the diaphragm necessitated an en bloc resection of 4 x 6 cm of the left hemidiaphragm. The defect was reconstructed with a Gortex patch graft. Pathology revealed a 32 x 22 x 8-cm liposarcoma with areas of sclerosing liposarcoma and poorly differentiated spindle cell sarcoma, focally Grade 3 of 3, with the remaining tumor being Grade 1. There was diaphragmatic invasion, but all surgical margins were negative. At 22 months CT follow-up, the patient has no radiographic evidence of disease. Excision of this mass with the renal capsule allowed our patient to be margin negative and maintain normal renal function. This is the only report in the literature describing nephron-sparing resection of a giant perirenal liposarcoma involving a solitary kidney.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in women with breast cancer has become routine in many surgical practices; yet basic questions regarding the procedure remain unanswered. The National Surgical Adjuvant Bowel and Breast Project (NSABP) and the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) trials address the issues of morbidity, efficacy, safety, and the significance of low-volume disease. NSABP B-32 randomizes women to sentinel lymph node biopsy followed by a standard level I and II axillary dissection or sentinel lymph node biopsy without dissection unless metastatic disease is noted by H&E examination. Overall survival, disease-free survival, and morbidity serve as end points. Further pathologic evaluation of the lymph nodes with immunohistochemistry will be performed by the study center. This study is nearing its anticipated accrual goal. Patients enrolled in the now-closed ACOSOG Z0010 trial underwent bone marrow aspiration just prior to sentinel node biopsy. Immunocytochemical analysis of the marrow will be compared to sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy to determine prognostic accuracy. ACOSOG Z0011 randomizes women undergoing breast-conserving therapy with low-volume axillary disease to completion axillary dissection or observation. Overall survival, disease-free survival, local regional control, and morbidity serve as end points. This trial is currently enrolling patients.

Despite randomized prospective studies and National Institutes of Health recommendations, surgeons especially in the southern United States have been slow to adopt breast conservation surgery (BCS). Data were analyzed regarding 3,349 cases of stage 0, I, and II breast cancer (1991-1998) from Charlotte-Mecklenburg County, NC; 1057 cases from six surrounding rural counties (1995-1997); and 90,398 cases (1995) from the National Cancer Data Base. During 1995 through 1997 Charlotte-Mecklenburg County had statistically significantly higher rates of BCS compared with six surrounding rural counties for stage I (59% and 42% respectively, P = 0.001) and stage II (37% and 19%, respectively, P = 0.001) breast cancer. The BCS rates in Charlotte-Mecklenburg County (1991-1998) showed the following: Stage 0 rate increased from 17 per cent in 1991 to 78 per cent in 1998 (P = 0.001), stage I rate increased from 31 per cent in 1991 to 65 per cent in 1998 (P = 0.001), and stage II rate increased from 18 per cent in 1991 to 42 per cent in 1998 (P = 0.001). BCS rates for early-stage breast cancer in Charlotte-Mecklenburg County have increased over the last 8 years and now equal national rates; however, patients in surrounding rural counties are not receiving BCS as frequently. There is a need for more widespread education of surgeons, other health care providers, and the general public to increase the use of BCS.