Search

Background: Thomboelastography (TEG) is a point of care viscoelastic test that provides an assessment of clot formation and kinetics. Antiplatelet agents are commonly used but there is limited literature evaluating their possible effects on overall clot kinetics. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between antiplatelet agents and clot kinetics as defined by TEG. Methods: This is a retrospective study of adult patients who underwent TEG from February 2018 to July 2020. Patients who received anticoagulants or blood transfusions within 72 hours, had an incomplete TEG, were diagnosed with COVID-19, or had liver failure were excluded. Patients were stratified based on antiplatelet status. Results: Of 1060 patients, 119 were included (50 controls, 69 antiplatelet agents—37 aspirin monotherapy, 26 dual antiplatelet therapy). Between the control and antiplatelet therapy groups, there was no significant difference in clot time, maximal clot strength, or fibrinogen level. When compared to control patients, patients on dual antiplatelets had significantly higher fibrinogen levels (408.1 mg/dL vs 481.5 mg/dL, P =.013) but no significant differences in clot time or maximal clot strength. In our subgroup analysis, patients on dual antiplatelets had increased maximal clot strength (58.8° vs 63°, P =.005) and fibrinogen levels (384.1 mg/dL vs 481.5 mg/dL, P =.005) compared to those on aspirin alone. Discussion: Compared to control patients and those on aspirin alone, patients on dual antiplatelets have increased maximal clot strength and increased fibrinogen levels. These results can help physicians better target product resuscitation in patients who are on antiplatelet agents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The classic findings of acute appendicitis-right lower quadrant pain, anorexia, and leukocytosis-have been well known. However, emergency medicine and surgical providers continue to rely on imaging to confirm the diagnosis. We aimed to evaluate the increase in reliance on computed tomography (CT) scans for acute appendicitis diagnosis over time.Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of patients ≥18 years presenting to UNC Hospitals with signs and symptoms of acute appendicitis who subsequently underwent appendectomy from 2011 to 2015. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and pathologic data were reviewed. We evaluated the incidence of CT scans stratified by year, age, and sex.Results: Within our male population, 55.2% (278/504) had classic appendicitis symptoms. Of the 278 male patients with classic appendicitis symptoms, 248 underwent CT imaging. Male patients <45 years of age were more likely to present with classic appendicitis symptoms (216/357, 60.5%) compared with patients aged 46-65 (52/108, 48.1%) or >65 (10/39, 25.6%). Of the male patients <45 years with classic appendicitis symptoms, the incidence of CT scans increased over time (68.3% in 2011, 84.2% in 2012, 92.3% in 2013, 93.9% in 2014, 92.3% in 2015). When considering the 216 CT scans that could have been avoided in our population, we calculate an approximate savings of $173 998.80 over 5 years.Conclusion: The incidence of CT scans for acute appendicitis confirmation has increased over time even in men. CT scans for the diagnosis or confirmation of acute appendicitis should rarely be indicated in men aged <45 years with classic appendicitis symptoms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Prompt appendectomy has long been the standard of care for acute appendicitis because of the risk of progression to perforation. Recently, studies have suggested nonemergent management of acute appendicitis. Our study aimed to determine changes in risk of rupture and complications in patients with appendicitis, with increasing time from symptom onset to treatment. Retrospective study of patients aged ≥18 years presenting to the University of North Carolina Hospitals with signs and symptoms of acute appendicitis who subsequently underwent appendectomy from 2011 to 2015 was performed. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and pathologic data were reviewed. Bivariate analysis was performed to assess variables associated with increased risk of perforation. Poisson regression modeling was completed to evaluate the risk of perforation and postoperative abscess based on time from symptoms to treatment. Within our database of 1007 patients, the mean time from onset of symptoms to operative intervention was 3.24 ± 2.2 days. Modified Poisson regression modeling demonstrated the relative risk for perforation increases by 9% (RR 1.09, P < 0.001) for each day delay. Age (RR 1.03), male gender (RR 1.50), temperature on admission (RR 1.32), and the presence of fecalith (RR 1.89) statistically significantly increased the risk of perforation. Furthermore, for each day delay, there is an 8% increased risk of postoperative abscess (RR 1.08, P = 0.027). The relative risk for appendiceal perforation is 9 per cent per day delay with a resultant 8 per cent increased risk of postoperative abscess. Thus, appendectomy for acute appendicitis should remain an emergent procedure, given that delays in operative management lead to complications and increases in cost of care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

One potential harm of nonoperative management for acute appendicitis is missed appendiceal cancer, a rare and often aggressive malignancy due to the frequency of late stage of diagnosis. Previous studies have reported an increasing incidence of appendiceal neoplasms in the population. This is a retrospective case-control study of 1007 adult patients, who presented to the University of North Carolina-Memorial Hospital (UNC-MH) between 2011 and 2015 with clinical signs and symptoms of appendicitis. We evaluated the incidence of primary appendiceal cancer in this population and determined factors that predict appendiceal cancer diagnosis using multivariate logistic regression analysis. The overall incidence of appendiceal neoplasm for adult patients presenting to UNC-MH with appendicitis from 2011 to 2015 was 2.3 per cent (23/1007). The incidence in patients without appendiceal perforation on pathology was 1.9 per cent (16/832). Age (odds ratio (OR) 1.03), number of days of abdominal pain (OR 1.16), self-reported fever (OR 2.08), appendiceal width (OR 1.95), and appendiceal wall thickness (OR 1.30) were predictors of appendiceal neoplasm diagnosis in patients that present with acute appendicitis. We recommend that an operative approach to acute appendicitis should remain the standard of care because operative management may not only be diagnostic but potentially therapeutic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]