Search

When a transmetatarsal amputation (TMA) is required, successful long-term limb salvage is questioned. We evaluated the influence of TMA on limb salvage in patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization. Patients who had distal bypasses extending to the infrapopliteal arterial tree and adjunctive TMA were retrospectively reviewed. Limb salvage was determined with life-table analysis. Twenty-four patients (29 limbs) were evaluated: 15 male and 9 female. Average age was 64.2 years old. Gangrene was the indication for bypass and TMA in 25 (86.2%) patients. Seven limbs were lost to follow-up. Nine of the remaining 22 limbs required below-knee (8) or above-knee (1) amputations, seven limbs within the first 3 months. In the group of patients who had major amputations within the first 3 months, graft thrombosis was the cause of leg amputation in six (85.7%) cases. No significant predictors of early major amputation were identified. Limb salvage was 62 per cent at 1 year in the TMA group. In comparison, among historical controls requiring distal revascularization and no adjunctive toe or foot amputations, limb salvage was 76.5 per cent (P = NS). Long-term limb salvage is dependent on successful lower extremity revascularization. Requirement for TMA should not influence the decision for limb salvage.

Our aging population may result in a rise in the prevalence of chronic mesenteric ischemia. This report reviews our contemporary experience with a tailored surgical approach to chronic mesenteric ischemia. The medical records of 17 patients operated on for chronic mesenteric ischemia were retrospectively reviewed. Symptom-free survival and long-term patency documented by duplex scanning when available were also analyzed. Sixteen patients ranging in age from 32 to 80 years were included in the study. Seventy-five per cent of the patients were female. The most common preoperative complaints were postprandial abdominal pain and weight loss. Revascularization was tailored to the arterial anatomy and included bypass to the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) alone (eight), bypass to the celiac artery and SMA (six), SMA reimplantation onto the aorta (one), SMA/inferior mesenteric artery reimplantation (one), and transaortic endarterectomy of the celiac artery/SMA (one). Bypass conduits included Dacron (eight), saphenous vein (four), and polytetrafluoroethylene (two). Bypass grafts originated from the supraceliac aorta in 12 patients; the remaining bypass originated from the left limb of an aortofemoral graft. There was one perioperative death (mortality 5.6%). Follow-up duplex scans at a mean of 34 months (range 1-114) showed no graft thromboses. We conclude that a variety of surgical techniques can provide durable relief of mesenteric ischemia. A tailored approach to revascularization optimizes patency and provides long-term symptom-free survival.

Currently a carotid duplex scan is the initial screening modality routinely used to evaluate occult extracranial carotid artery injuries secondary to blunt neck trauma. The objective of this study was to investigate the role of carotid artery duplex scanning in patients who suffered blunt trauma to the neck with a "seat belt sign." The medical records of 131 consecutive patients who sustained blunt trauma to the neck from a motor vehicle accident were reviewed. Patients with the cervical seat belt sign underwent a complete physical examination and carotid duplex scan in an accredited vascular laboratory. An intimal flap with severe carotid artery stenosis was found in one of 131 patients (0.76%). This patient has multiple injuries to the face, head, chest, lateralizing neurological signs, and a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 8. In an era of cost containment, resource consumption should target appropriate populations. A cervical seat belt sign should not serve as a sole indicator for evaluation of the carotid artery in the absence of other pertinent signs or symptoms.

The role of combined carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with severe asymptomatic carotid artery disease and concurrent symptomatic coronary artery disease is controversial. The objective of this report is to investigate the safety of combined CEA/CABG. The medical records of 30 patients who underwent combined CEA/CABG for coexistent asymptomatic carotid and symptomatic coronary artery occlusive disease were reviewed. All patients were scheduled for either elective or urgent myocardial revascularization due to their symptomatic coronary artery disease. Color-flow duplex scanning identified internal carotid artery stenosis of 80 to 99 per cent in 28 patients (93%) and 50 to 79 per cent in 2 patients (7%). Seventeen patients (57%) were male. The mean age was 64 +/- 10 years (range, 42-84 years). Contralateral internal carotid artery occlusion was present in four patients. Severe left main coronary artery disease was present in 12 patients (40%) and 7 patients (23%) had an ejection fraction of less than 50 per cent. There were no perioperative deaths or strokes. One patient suffered a myocardial infarction on postoperative day 1. This study demonstrates the safety of combined CEA/CABG for coexistent coronary and asymptomatic carotid disease. Using this surgical approach for critical coexistent disease may minimize the incidence of perioperative cerebrovascular complications in patients undergoing CABG.

Vascular complications of thoracic outlet syndrome are uncommon but may result in significant long-term disability. This report documents a retrospective review of 17 such patients. Ten patients presented with acute onset of upper extremity swelling and axillosubclavian vein thrombosis. One patient presented with chronic, intermittent arm swelling and subclavian vein stenosis. Three patients presented with acute symptoms of upper extremity emboli, and three presented with chronic arm claudication. Cervical ribs were discovered in four patients with arterial symptoms and in no patients with venous symptoms. All ten patients with acute venous thrombosis underwent successful thrombolysis, with venous stenosis uncovered in 8. Thrombolysis was also performed for two patients with arterial emboli. All 17 patients underwent surgical decompression of the thoracic outlet, 16 via a supraclavicular approach and one via a transaxillary approach. One subclavian arteriotomy with endarterectomy and one resection of a subclavian artery aneurysm were performed at the time of decompression. Repeat venography after decompression demonstrated persistent venous stenosis in one patient that was treated with balloon angioplasty and stenting. After a mean of 22 months' follow-up, 12 patients had no residual symptoms, and 5 had experienced significant improvement of symptoms. In conclusion, a combined approach of thrombolysis and surgical decompression of the thoracic outlet provides a salutary outcome in a majority of patients.

Ex vivo renal artery reconstruction is a technique used to repair renal vascular lesions not amenable to conventional in situ methods of revascularization, either because of anatomical considerations or the inability of the kidney to tolerate the extended period of warm ischemia necessary to complete the procedure. In general, this refers to lesions at or beyond the division of the main renal artery into the segmental branches. The kidney is mobilized to the level of the abdominal wall after dividing the origins of the renal artery and vein from the aorta and inferior vena cava, respectively. The ureter is left intact. The kidney is cooled by placing it in an external slush bath and by perfusion through the renal vessels of a cold electrolyte solution. A suitable conduit (usually saphenous vein or hypogastric artery) is then prepared for grafting. After completion of the distal anastomosis(es), the kidney is returned to the renal fossa, and the proximal anastomosis to the aorta is completed. The renal vein is then reattached, thus completing revascularization of the kidney. We report our experience with five orthotopic ex vivo renal artery reconstructions. Indications for the procedure, details of the technique, and expected results are discussed.

The most common cause of failure of hemodialysis access sites is stenosis within the site. The stenoses have traditionally been corrected surgically, but endovascular techniques may be an alternative method to treat these flow-limiting lesions and maintain graft patency. Over a recent 17-month period, endoluminal stents to relieve stenoses resistant to balloon dilatation alone were placed in 14 access sites. All sites were located on the upper extremity (13 PTFE bridge grafts and 1 A-V fistula). A total of 20 stents were placed: seven at the venous anastomosis, 12 in the venous outflow tract (including 3 in the subclavian vein), and one within the graft. Nine patients had placement of a single stent, four patients had two stents placed, and one patient had three. An additional eight stenotic lesions within these 14 sites were successfully dilated without need of a stent. After stent placement, these 14 sites have remained functional for a mean of 6.2 months. Four were functioning without further intervention at a mean of 8.5 months. Nine sites occluded at a mean of 4.7 months. The remaining site remained functional until death of the patient 10 months after stent placement. Of the nine failed sites, four developed restenosis at the site of stent placement, four developed stenoses at other sites, and the other site was abandoned. Three stents were placed in subclavian vein stenoses, and none of these has failed. Further study is necessary to determine whether endovascular stenting of dialysis access site stenoses will prove to be a durable, cost-effective alternative to surgical revision.