Search

AbstractPopulation spatial synchrony-the tendency for temporal population fluctuations to be correlated across locations-is common and important to metapopulation stability and persistence. One common cause of spatial synchrony, termed the Moran effect, occurs when populations respond to environmental fluctuations, such as weather, that are correlated over space. Although the degree of spatial synchrony in environmental fluctuations can differ between seasons and different population processes occur in different seasons, the impact on population spatial synchrony is uncertain because prior work has largely assumed that the spatial synchrony of environmental fluctuations and their effect on populations are consistent over annual sampling intervals. We used theoretical models to examine how seasonality in population processes and the spatial synchrony of environmental drivers affect population spatial synchrony. We found that population spatial synchrony can depend not only on the spatial synchrony of environmental drivers but also on the degree to which environmental fluctuations are correlated across seasons, locally, and across space. Moreover, measurements of synchrony from "snapshot" population censuses may not accurately reflect synchrony during other parts of the year. Together, these results show that neglecting seasonality in environmental conditions and population processes is consequential for understanding population spatial synchrony and its driving mechanisms.

AbstractFunctionally variable symbionts commonly co-occur including within the roots of individual plants, in spite of arguments from simple models of the stability of mutualism that predict competitive exclusion among symbionts. We explore this paradox by evaluating the dynamics generated by symbiont competition for plant resources and the plant's preferential allocation to the most beneficial symbiont using a system of differential equations representing the densities of mutualistic and nonmutualistic symbionts and the level of preferentially allocated and nonpreferentially allocated resources for which the symbionts compete. We find that host preferential allocation and costs of mutualism generate resource specialization that makes the coexistence of beneficial and nonbeneficial symbionts possible. Furthermore, coexistence becomes likely because of negative physiological feedbacks in host preferential allocation. We find that biologically realistic models of plant physiology and symbiont competition predict that the coexistence of beneficial and nonbeneficial symbionts should be common in root symbioses and that the density and relative abundance of mutualists should increase in proportion to the needs of the host.