Search

Acid mine drainage remediation is an unresolved matter in abandoned mining districts around the world. Development and implementation of passive treatment systems in these areas are commonly focused on engineering and water quality aspects. Neoformed mineral phases precipitated within the reactive material of these passive treatments account for the removal of pollutants but also can cause clogging and passivation of the reactive substrate. After 20 months of operation and monitoring, the limestone-based passive treatment system implemented in Mina Esperanza (SW Spain) was sampled to study the relationship between water chemistry, mineral composition of the neoformed precipitates, and treatment performance. Water chemical profiles show the existence of three precipitation zones controlled by Fe, Al, and Zn hydrochemistry and also a migration with time of precipitation zones downward into the reactive material. These precipitation zones were also confirmed by a mineral study performed on the solid samples where either schwertmannite and goethite or hydrobasaluminite and Zn-rich green rust were the mineral phases that controlled the metal removal in the three precipation (Fe, Al, or Zn) zones. Iron and Al precipitates were observed to play a critical role in the time evolution of the reactive material hydraulic conductivity. Furthermore, Al precipitates passivated to some extent the limestone grains by armoring, although migration of the Fe precipitation zone and Al redissolution later activated the limestone grains. A higher proportion of limestone in the reactive mixture and the addition of new reagents to the bottom section of the reactive material (to enhance the reducing environment and to promote divalent metal removal) are proposed on the basis of this hydrochemical and mineralogical study for a future design for the Mina Esperanza passive treatment system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Metal removal and neutralization of acid mine drainage (AMD) in treatment systems is often controlled by addition of alkaline reagents and metal hydrolysis reactions. To overcome the disadvantage of high cost by conventional treatments, the use of paper mill wastes was evaluated as an alkaline additive to treat AMD at sites within the Iberian Pyrite Belt (IPB) through batch experiments in the laboratory. Paper wastes include three by-products from kraft pulping in a nearby mill: green liquor dregs, slacker grits, and lime mud. When paper mill wastes interacted with AMD, the initial pH increased up to circumneutral values and enhanced greatly the metal removal, reaching average ratios of up to 100% for Al, 98% for Fe, and 66% for Zn (major elements) and 100% for As, Cr, and Cu, 84% for Cd, and 75% for Ni (minor elements). After reaction, gypsum and poorly crystalline Fe-Al oxy-hydroxides and oxy-hydroxysulfates were the main precipitates identified by X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy. Trace metal uptake is mainly attributed to co-precipitation and/or adsorption onto the newly formed Fe-Al precipitates. Geochemical modeling of solutions using the PHREEQC code predicted supersaturation of the observed phases. The experimental results were optimized with the PHREEQC code and combined with the annual production of each waste to quantify the extent of a possible treatment at field-scale. According to our estimations, the system proposed is able to treat effectively an annual total volume of 11.6 hm³, which is equivalent to a mean discharge of 368 L/s. Green liquor dregs alone would be able to treat 86% of the total volume. This result demonstrates the possibility of using alkaline paper mill wastes for treatment and restoration of worldwide natural resources extremely contaminated by AMD such as the IPB. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the present study, experiments in non-saturated leaching columns were conducted to characterize the neoformed phases that precipitate at the interface between two waste residues having different chemical characteristics: an acid mine drainage producer residue (i.e., pyritic sludge) and an acidity neutralizer residue (i.e., coal combustion fly ash). A heating source was placed on top of one of the columns to accelerate oxidation and precipitation of newly formed phases, and thus, to observe longer-scale processes. When both residues are deposited together, the resulting leachates are characterized by alkaline pH, and low sulfate and metal concentrations. Two mechanisms help to improve the quality of the leachates. Over short-time scales, the leaching of pyrite at high pH (as a consequence of fly ash addition) favors the precipitation of ferrihydrite, encapsulating the pyrite grains and attenuating the oxidation process. Over longer time scales, a hardpan is promoted at the interface between both residues due to the precipitation of ferrihydrite, jarosite, and a Ca phase-gypsum or aragonite, depending on carbonate ion activity. Geochemical modeling of leachates using PHREEQC software predicted supersaturation in the observed minerals. The development of a relatively rigid crust at the interface favors the isolation of the mining waste from weathering processes, helped by the cementation of fly ash owing to aragonite precipitation, which ensures total isolation and neutralization of the mine residues. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]