1. Effectiveness of the Hydrogen Sulfide Test as a Water Quality Indicator for Diarrhea Risk in Rural Bangladesh.
- Author
-
Islam M, Ercumen A, Naser AM, Unicomb L, Rahman M, Arnold BF, Colford JM Jr, and Luby SP
- Subjects
- Bangladesh epidemiology, Child, Preschool, Colony Count, Microbial, Escherichia coli isolation & purification, Family Characteristics, Female, Filtration, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Prevalence, Risk Factors, Rural Population, Sensitivity and Specificity, Water Microbiology, Diarrhea epidemiology, Diarrhea microbiology, Drinking Water analysis, Drinking Water microbiology, Hydrogen Sulfide analysis, Water Quality
- Abstract
Microbiological water quality is usually assessed by the identification of Escherichia coli ( E. coli ), a fecal indicator. The hydrogen sulfide (H
2 S) test is an inexpensive, easy-to-use, and portable alternative field-based water quality test. Our study evaluated the H2 S test's effectiveness as a water quality indicator for diarrhea risk. Field workers collected stored drinking water samples for H2 S analysis and detection of E. coli by membrane filtration and measured caregiver-reported diarrhea among children < 5 years in the same households 1 month later. We assessed the association between the H2 S test (incubated for 24 hours and 48 hours) and diarrhea prevalence, with 2-day and 7-day symptom recall periods ( N = 1,348). We determined the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value (PPV, NPV) of the H2 S test compared with E. coli ( N = 525). Controlling for potentially confounding covariates, H2 S-positive water (at 24 or 48 hours) was not associated with 2-day diarrhea prevalence (24-hour prevalence ratio [PR] = 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.63-1.69; 48-hour PR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.58-1.38) or 7-day diarrhea prevalence (24-hour PR = 1.17, 95% CI: 0.76-1.78; 48-hour PR = 1.21, 95% CI: 0.81-1.80). The sensitivity, PPV, and NPV of the H2 S test was significantly higher when the H2 S test was incubated for 48 versus 24 hours whereas specificity showed the opposite trend. H2 S test sensitivity, PPV, and NPV increased with increasing E. coli levels, consistent with previous evidence that the H2 S test is a useful water quality tool in high-contamination settings. However, our results suggest that the H2 S test is not an effective indicator for waterborne diarrhea.- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF