Search

ATG-Fresenius S (ATG-F) is a polyclonal anti-human-T-lymphocyte immunoglobulin preparation that has been clinically developed to prevent episodes of acute cellular rejection. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ATG-F at doses of 5 and 9 mg/kg versus placebo in adult recipients of a primary lung allograft. The primary efficacy composite end point was defined as death, graft loss, acute rejection and/or loss to follow-up within 12 months of transplantation. The interim analysis showed the ATG-F 5 mg/kg treatment to be inefficacious, and it would be impossible to enroll enough patients to power the study to show a difference between the 9 mg/kg arm and the placebo arm. Therefore, the main focus of the study shifted to the safety end points and a descriptive analysis of the primary end point. At 12 months posttransplant, the efficacy failure rate was not significantly different between the ATG-F 9 mg/kg group and the placebo group (40.2% vs. 36.7%, respectively). This large study did not demonstrate a significant reduction in acute cellular rejection, graft loss or death with single-dose induction therapy with ATG-F within the first year after lung transplantation.

While EBV PCR is used in the management of PTLD, the optimal primer set, relative importance of intracellular versus free plasma EBV, and the baseline profile in an organ transplant population remains unclear. We performed a prospective 2-arm trial utilizing an EBV PCR panel measuring LMP-1, EBER-1 and EBNA-1 in both free plasma as well as intracellular whole blood. Control Arm A consisted of 31 lung transplant patients and Arm B consisted of 35 transplant patients being evaluated for possible PTLD. In Arm A, 1/31 (3%) patients developed a transient plasma EBV load. Thirteen of 31 (42%) had detectable intracellular EBV. In Arm B, 17 (49%) patients were diagnosed with PTLD. Thirteen (76%) had EBV-positive PTLD with 12/13 (92%) having detectable EBV by PCR. The EBV PCR panel had a high sensitivity (92%), specificity (72%), positive predictive value (PPV) (71%) and negative predictive value (NPV) (93%) for diagnosing EBV-positive PTLD and followed patients' clinical course well (p < 0.001). Comparing the individual PCR assays, plasma EBNA PCR was superior with high sensitivity (77%), specificity (100%), PPV (100%) and NPV (86%). We conclude that EBV PCR is a useful test for managing PTLD patients. While plasma EBNA PCR is the best single assay for diagnosing and monitoring PTLD, the complete PCR panel is superior for ruling out its presence.