Search

Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is a complex disease with unique biological behavior that usually arises from appendiceal mucinous neoplasia. The classification of PMP and its primary appendiceal neoplasia is contentious, and an international modified Delphi consensus process was instigated to address terminology and definitions. A classification of mucinous appendiceal neoplasia was developed, and it was agreed that "mucinous adenocarcinoma" should be reserved for lesions with infiltrative invasion. The term "low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm" was supported and it was agreed that "cystadenoma" should no longer be recommended. A new term of "high-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm" was proposed for lesions without infiltrative invasion but with high-grade cytologic atypia. Serrated polyp with or without dysplasia was preferred for tumors with serrated features confined to the mucosa with an intact muscularis mucosae. Consensus was achieved on the pathologic classification of PMP, defined as the intraperitoneal accumulation of mucus due to mucinous neoplasia characterized by the redistribution phenomenon. Three categories of PMP were agreed-low grade, high grade, and high grade with signet ring cells. Acellular mucin should be classified separately. It was agreed that low-grade and high-grade mucinous carcinoma peritonei should be considered synonymous with disseminated peritoneal adenomucinosis and peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis, respectively. A checklist for the pathologic reporting of PMP and appendiceal mucinous neoplasms was also developed. By adopting the classifications and definitions that were agreed, different centers will be able to use uniform terminology that will allow meaningful comparison of their results.

Serous carcinoma of the ovary has been traditionally graded as well-differentiated, moderately differentiated, and poorly differentiated (ie, a 3-tier system). A new 2-tier system grades serous carcinomas into low or high grade. Recent morphologic and molecular studies have shown that invasive well-differentiated serous carcinoma, referred to by us as "invasive low-grade micropapillary serous carcinoma," is clearly distinct from high-grade serous carcinoma from the standpoint of pathogenesis and clinicopathologic features. As high-grade serous carcinoma is histologically heterogeneous, the goal of this study was to determine, based on molecular and drug resistance data, whether further subclassification of high-grade serous carcinomas into additional grades (moderately and poorly differentiated) has biologic validity. One hundred eleven ovarian and peritoneal high-grade serous carcinomas further subclassified as moderately and poorly differentiated types using the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) grading system were analyzed for TP53 mutations and in vitro extreme drug resistance to 10 chemotherapeutic drugs. Seventy-six and 35 cases were subclassified as moderately and poorly differentiated, respectively. A TP53 mutation was present in 84% of moderately and 70% of poorly differentiated types of high-grade serous carcinomas, respectively (P=0.21), and there were no significant differences in the frequency of extreme drug resistance for each of the 10 drugs tested (P values ranging from 0.14 to >0.99). Although additional investigation is warranted, this study suggests that subclassification of high-grade serous carcinoma into moderately and poorly differentiated is not relevant. Accordingly, they can be simply classified as high-grade serous carcinoma.

Pseudomyxoma peritonei is a clinical term for gelatinous ascites, usually secondary to an appendiceal tumor. The pathologic classification of pseudomyxoma peritonei and its associated appendiceal tumors has been plagued with controversy and confusing terminology. In an effort to clarify this, we reviewed the pathology of 101 patients, all treated at our institution from 1993 to 2005, with pseudomyxoma peritonei of appendiceal origin. All patients were uniformly treated with our standardized protocol. This is the largest pathologic series solely devoted to appendiceal neoplasia with gelatinous ascites. The cases were assigned, according to previously published criteria, to the categories of disseminated peritoneal adenomucinosis (DPAM), peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis (PMCA), or PMCA with intermediate (well differentiated) features (PMCA-I), with the exception that any case with a signet-ring cell component was considered as PMCA and not PMCA-I. By histologic category, 58 patients had DPAM, 23 were PMCA, and 20 were PMCA-I.One-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival outcomes were not significantly different between DPAM and PMCA-I. DPAM and PMCA-I also exhibited a roughly equal incidence of parenchymal (beyond the serosa) organ invasion. Survival outcomes were significantly worse for PMCA, compared with PMCA-I and DPAM. After reviewing our data and the literature, mucinous carcinoma peritonei-low grade was applied to the low-grade histology of pseudomyxoma peritonei, including those cases referred to by some as DPAM in the same category as PMCA-I. Cases that are moderately differentiated to poorly differentiated are classified as mucinous carcinoma peritonei-high grade.

Characterization of invasive peritoneal implants from patients with noninvasive serous ovarian tumors has important prognostic and treatment implications, but the criteria for distinguishing invasive and noninvasive implants vary among investigators and can be difficult to apply. The authors studied 148 implants from 60 patients, 33 with primary atypical proliferative serous tumor, and 27 with primary noninvasive micropapillary serous carcinoma, with a mean follow-up of 62 months (median follow-up, 52 months). Previously reported and newly proposed histologic features for implant classification were evaluated and correlated with clinical outcome. Three criteria were applied for the diagnosis of "invasive" implants: invasion of underlying normal tissue, micropapillary architecture, and solid epithelial nests surrounded by clefts. Implants displaying any one of these three features were classified as "invasive," whereas those lacking all three features were classified as "noninvasive." Sixty-six implants were invasive and 82 were noninvasive. Of the 31 patients with invasive implants, six were dead of disease (DOD), 13 were alive with progressive disease (AWPD), and 12 were alive with no evidence of disease (NED). Of the 29 patients with noninvasive implants, two were DOD, one was dead of uncertain causes, one was AWPD, and 25 were alive with NED. Eighty-nine percent of invasive implants had a micropapillary architecture and 83% had solid epithelial nests surrounded by clefts. A minority of invasive implants (14% of those with underlying normal tissue) demonstrated invasion of normal underlying tissue. Nuclear atypia, mitoses, calcification, necrosis, and identification of individual cells "infiltrating" the stroma did not correlate with implant type. The proposed criteria permitted recognition of implants that correlated strongly with adverse outcome. Sixty-one percent of patients with implants displaying any one of the three features used to diagnose invasive implants were AWPD or DOD compared with 10% of patients whose implants lacked these features (p = 0.00001). Because implants associated with an adverse outcome can be identified before they invade underlying normal tissue, the term invasive implant to describe them is inaccurate and misleading. These implants resemble patterns of growth in micropapillary serous carcinoma of the ovary and the recurrent tumor that is obvious carcinoma. Accordingly, we propose that these extraovarian lesions be designated "well-differentiated serous carcinoma."

Mucinous ovarian neoplasms other than cystadenomas and adenofibromas have been classified as either borderline tumors or carcinomas for many years. Borderline tumors have been subdivided more recently into endocervical-like (mullerian) and intestinal forms. Such a distinction is rarely made in the mucinous carcinoma category. We did not encounter a pure endocervical-like carcinoma in the present series. Criteria for distinguishing an intestinal-type mucinous borderline tumor from a mucinous carcinoma have been controversial. In this study of 164 mucinous borderline tumors of intestinal type and 32 mucinous carcinomas, the former were further subdivided into 74 cases with epithelial atypia only and 90 with focal intraepithelial carcinoma. Of the 67 stage I tumors in the borderline (with atypia) category, all 49 with follow-up data were clinically benign; in the seven cases that had been designated stage III, the intraoperative appearance was that of "pseudomyxoma peritonei," which was fatal in four cases. Most of these tumors, however, were probably metastatic to the ovary rather than truly primary borderline tumors, although failure to examine the appendix in six cases compromised their interpretation. All 90 mucinous borderline tumors that had foci of intraepithelial carcinoma were recorded as stage I, but two of the 69 patients with follow-up data (3%) had fatal recurrences. Both of these tumors were incompletely staged, however, and one had ruptured intraoperatively. Thirty-two invasive carcinomas were subdivided into 12 expansile and 20 infiltrative subtypes; within the latter category seven tumors were only microinvasive. All 12 carcinomas with only expansile invasion were stage I; none of the 10 with follow-up data recurred. All seven microinvasive infiltrative carcinomas were stage I; none of the five with follow-up data recurred. One of five patients with stage I infiltrative carcinomas that were more than microinvasive and were adequately followed had a fatal recurrence, but staging had been incomplete in that case. Seven of the remaining eight infiltrative carcinomas were higher than stage I: five of the six (83%) with follow-up data persisted or recurred and were fatal. Considering all stages, increasing tumor grade in the carcinoma category correlated with an unfavorable outcome. However, grade did not influence prognosis in stage I carcinomas. Among 13 stage I cases in all categories with either preoperative or intraoperative tumor rupture and follow-up data, one recurred, a tumor in the borderline with intraepithelial carcinoma category. "Pseudomyxoma peritonei" is an ill-defined term and should not be used as a pathologic diagnosis. The presence of mucin in the abdominal cavity requires careful histologic evaluation to characterize it for prognostic purposes. Adequate and sometimes extensive sampling of mucinous ovarian tumors, the appendix and the peritoneum in cases of "pseudomyxoma peritonei" is necessary to achieve an accurate diagnosis and prognosis.

Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is a poorly understood condition characterized by mucinous ascites and mucinous implants diffusely involving the peritoneal surfaces. There is considerable debate regarding the definition, pathology, site of origin, and prognosis of PMP. We analyzed the clinicopathologic features of 109 cases of multifocal peritoneal mucinous tumors to develop a pathologic definition of cases characterized by the clinical condition PMP. Cases were separated into two diagnostic categories: disseminated peritoneal adenomucinosis (DPAM) and peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis (PMCA). Cases classified as DPAM were characterized by peritoneal lesions composed of abundant extracellular mucin containing scant simple to focally proliferative mucinous epithelium with little cytologic atypia or mitotic activity, with or without an associated appendiceal mucinous adenoma. Cases classified as PMCA were characterized by peritoneal lesions composed of more abundant mucinous epithelium with the architectural and cytologic features of carcinoma, with or without an associated primary mucinous adenocarcinoma. Sixty-five of the 109 cases (59.6%) were classified as DPAM consistent with origin from an appendiceal mucinous adenoma. Thirty-seven of the 65 cases (56.9%) had a documented appendiceal mucinous adenoma. Thirty cases (27.5%) were classified as PMCA consistent with origin from an appendiceal or intestinal mucinous adenocarcinoma. Fourteen cases (12.8%) were classified as PMCA with features intermediate between DPAM and PMCA or with discordant features based on the finding of at least focal areas of carcinoma in the peritoneal lesions, whether or not the primary site demonstrated carcinoma. The cases with intermediate features were derived from well-differentiated appendiceal or intestinal mucinous adenocarcinomas and had peritoneal lesions displaying features of DPAM as well as focal areas of mucinous carcinoma. The cases with discordant features were derived from atypical appendiceal adenomas with little or no histologic evidence of a transition from adenoma to carcinoma and had peritoneal lesions uniformly composed of mucinous carcinoma. There was a statistically significant difference in survival between cases classified as DPAM, those classified as PMCA with intermediate or discordant features, and those classified as PMCA (p < 0.0001). The age-adjusted 5-year survival rates were 84% for patients with DPAM, 37.6% for patients with PMCA with intermediate or discordant features, and 6.7% for patients with PMCA. The term DPAM should be used to diagnose the histologically benign peritoneal lesions associated with ruptured appendiceal mucinous adenomas and those that are pathologically identical but lack a demonstrable appendiceal adenoma. Cases with the pathologic features of adenocarcinoma should be designated PMCA because they have recognizably different pathologic features and a significantly worse prognosis.