Search

Background: Pathologic changes of the long head of the biceps tendon are a recognized source of shoulder pain in adults that can be treated with tenotomy or tenodesis when nonoperative measures are not effective. It is not clear whether arthroscopic or open biceps tenodesis has a clinical advantage. Hypothesis: Pain relief and shoulder function after all-arthroscopic suprapectoral biceps tenodesis are similar to outcomes after an open subpectoral tenodesis. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A prospective database was reviewed for patients undergoing an all-arthroscopic suprapectoral or open subpectoral biceps tenodesis. Adult patients with a minimum 18-month follow-up were included. Patients undergoing a concomitant rotator cuff or labral repair were excluded. The groups were matched to age within 3 years, sex, and time to follow-up within 3 months. Pain improvement, development of a ‘‘Popeye’’ deformity, muscle cramping, postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, satisfaction scores, and complications were evaluated. Results: Forty-six patients (23 all-arthroscopic, 23 open) with an average age of 57.2 years (range, 45-70 years) were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 30.1 months (range, 21.1-44.9 months). No patients in either group developed a Popeye deformity or complained of arm cramping. There was no significant difference in mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores between the open and all-arthroscopic groups (92.3 vs 88.9; P = .42); similarly, there was no significant difference in patient satisfaction scores between the groups (8.9 vs 9.1; P = .73). Eighteen patients (78.3%) in the arthroscopic cohort and 16 (69.6%) in the open cohort fully returned to athletic activity (P = .50). Eight patients (34.8%) in the arthroscopic group and 10 (39.1%) in the open group reported pain at night or with heavy activities. There were no complications in the all-arthroscopic group. There were 2 complications in the open group that resolved by final follow-up. Conclusion: Biceps tenodesis remains a reliable treatment for pathologic abnormality of the long head of the biceps. Patients undergoing an all-arthroscopic suprapectoral tenodesis in the distal aspect or distal to the bicipital groove showed similar pain relief and clinical outcomes as compared with patients undergoing open subpectoral tenodesis. Open subpectoral biceps tenodesis may carry a higher complication risk secondary to a more invasive technique. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents research which examined the outcomes of patients who underwent hip arthroscopic surgery using T-capsulotomy. Topics covered include the comparison of partial repair with complete repair for femoroacetabular impingement. Also mentioned are risk factors that could affect conditions of patients who underwent the surgery such as patient sex and age.

This article discusses a study which evaluated clinical outcomes in a cohort of patients with borderline dysplasia who were treated with arthroscopic labral preservation and capsular plication. Between April 2008 and November 2010, the researchers examined patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for symptomatic intra-articular hip disorders. They learned that patients with borderline dysplasia have often fallen into a gray area between arthroscopy and periacetabular osteotomy.

The article discusses the study of early outcomes of endoscopic repair of partial and full-thickness gluteus medius tears. It states that gluteus medius tears can transmit functional impairment causing chronic peritrochanteric hip pain. It reveals the satisfactory scores of all hip specific surgery with postoperative improvement. Endoscopic surgical repair performed through fullthickness technique, is an effective treatment of gluteus medius tears of minimum 2 years follow-up is also concluded.