1. Hypervascular Thyroid Nodules on Time-Resolved MR Angiography at 3 T: Radiologic–Pathologic Correlation
- Author
-
Anderanik Tomasian, J. Paul Finn, Derek G. Lohan, Mayil S. Krishnam, and Roya Saleh
- Subjects
Adult ,Gadolinium DTPA ,Male ,Thyroid nodules ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Frequency of occurrence ,Contrast Media ,Malignancy ,Imaging, Three-Dimensional ,Prevalence ,medicine ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Thyroid Neoplasms ,Thyroid Nodule ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,Aged, 80 and over ,First pass ,Neovascularization, Pathologic ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Thyroid ,Mr angiography ,Radiologic pathologic correlation ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Injections, Intravenous ,Angiography ,Female ,Radiology ,Nuclear medicine ,business ,Magnetic Resonance Angiography - Abstract
Detection of a thyroid nodule, either incidental or as a result of related symptomatology, is an extremely common event, often inducing considerable uncertainty regarding the requirement for and best means of further investigation. Whereas tissue sampling represents the sole means of true characterization of these lesions, a number of imaging characteristics have been suggested as potential indicators of the presence of malignancy. The potential value of time-resolved MR angiography, whereby a minimal dose of i.v. contrast agent is dynamically depicted during the first pass of the bolus through the various compartments of circulation, has recently been realized, particularly so with regard to supraaortic angiography. However, it is not uncommon during such temporal imaging to identify focal hyperenhancing thyroid nodules, the significance of which has not previously been described in the literature. We describe the frequency of occurrence and potential significance of this finding, using pathologic correlation where available.The prevalence of malignancy in incidentally detected focal hyperenhancing thyroid parenchymal nodules during time-resolved MR angiography is significant, representing 8.3% (1/12) of patients for whom cytologic correlation was available. Further investigation is certainly warranted when encountering such a lesion in clinical practice, particularly because it appears as though time-resolved MR angiography is of no value in the pathologic discrimination of such incidentally identified lesions.
- Published
- 2008