1. Pleural Mesothelioma and Occupational Coexposure to Asbestos, Mineral Wool, and Silica
- Author
-
Stéphane Ducamp, Patrick Brochard, Annabelle Gilg Soit Ilg, Aude Lacourt, Ellen Imbernon, Joelle Fevotte, Sabyne Audignon, Céline Gramond, and Marcel Goldberg
- Subjects
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine ,medicine.medical_specialty ,business.industry ,Pleural mesothelioma ,Job-exposure matrix ,Mineral wool ,Case-control study ,Odds ratio ,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine ,medicine.disease_cause ,medicine.disease ,Asbestos ,Confidence interval ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Mesothelioma ,business - Abstract
Methods: A total of 1,199 male cases and 2,379 control subjects were included in a French pooled case-control study. Complete job histories were collected, and occupational exposure to asbestos, mineral wool (MW), and silica were assessed by three French job exposure matrices.Unconditional logisticregressionmodelsadjustedfor age, birth date, and occupational asbestos exposure were used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Measurements and Main Results: A significant association between mesothelioma and MW exposure was observed after adjustment for occupational asbestos exposure. OR for subjects exposed to less than 0.01 fibers$ml 21 $yr 21 was 1.6 (95% CI, 1.2–2.1) and increased to 2.5 (95% CI, 1.8–3.4) for subjects exposed to more than 0.32 fibers$ml 21 $yr 21 . All ORs for silica exposure were around the null. CoexposuretoeitherasbestosandMWorasbestosandsilicaseemed toincreasethe risk ofpleuralmesothelioma. ORswere 17.6 (95%CI, 11.8–26.2) and 9.8 (95% CI, 4.2–23.2) for subjects exposed to both asbestos and MW and for subjects exposed to both asbestos and silica, respectively, compared with 4.3 (95% CI, 1.9–9.8) for occupational asbestos exposure alone. Conclusions: Our results are in favor of an increased risk of pleural mesothelioma for subjects exposed to both asbestos and MW or asbestos and silica.
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF