Search

Long-acting beta-agonists (LABAs) and inhaled corticosteroids administered together appear to be complementary in terms of effects on asthma control. The elements of asthma control achieved by LABAs (improved lung function) and leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs; protection against exacerbations) may be complementary as well.We sought to determine whether the combination of the LTRA montelukast and the LABA salmeterol could provide an effective therapeutic strategy for asthma.In a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study of 192 subjects with moderate asthma, we compared the clinical efficacy of regular treatment over 14 weeks with the combination of montelukast and salmeterol to that with the combination of beclomethasone and salmeterol in moderate asthma. The primary efficacy outcome was time to treatment failure.Three months after the randomization of the last subject, the Data and Safety Monitoring Board determined that the primary research question had been answered and terminated the trial. The combination of montelukast and salmeterol was inferior to the combination of beclomethasone and salmeterol as judged by protection against asthma treatment failures (p = 0.0008), lung function (26 L/min difference in a.m. peak expiratory flow rate, p = 0.011), asthma control score (0.22 difference in Asthma Control Questionnaire score, p = 0.038), and markers of inflammation and airway reactivity.Patients with moderate asthma similar to those we studied should not substitute the combination of an LTRA and an LABA for the combination of inhaled corticosteroid and an LABA.

Subjects with asthma have higher concentrations of exhaled nitric oxide (NO) than normal individuals. It has been demonstrated that in asthmatics, repeated FVC maneuvers reduce NO. Although the cause of this phenomenon is not known, it has been hypothesized that deep breaths associated with FVC maneuvers reduce exhaled NO by affecting neural sources of NO, possibly via a mechanism related to the pathobiology of asthma. To establish whether FVC maneuvers influence NO concentrations in normal individuals, we measured exhaled NO at baseline values and after FVC maneuvers performed every 15 min for 1 h in subjects without asthma. To investigate the role of deep breaths in reducing exhaled NO, we compared these results with concentrations of exhaled NO after plethysmography. Repeated FVC maneuvers over 60 min produced a decrease in NO concentrations in mixed expired gas (F(E)NO; 24.6 +/- 5.1% decrease for F(E)NO, p0. 01 versus baseline). In contrast to the results after spirometry, repeated specific airway conductance (sGaw) maneuvers do not have a significant effect on F(E)NO (p = 0.16). These results, which demonstrate that in nonasthmatic subjects FVC maneuvers-but not panting maneuvers-produce a fall in NO, suggest that the mechanism responsible for the reduction in exhaled NO after FVC maneuvers is related to volume history of the lung rather than the pathobiology of asthma.

Compared with normal individuals, subjects with asthma have elevated levels of expired nitric oxide (NO). These levels are hypothesized to reflect the degree of airway inflammation. Expired NO levels rise during the late phase of allergen challenge and decrease in asthmatics after steroid treatment. Isocapnic cold air hyperventilation (ISH) is believed to cause airway narrowing through noninflammatory mechanisms. We measured mixed expired NO in 10 individuals with atopic asthma who underwent both ISH challenge and allergen challenge, and compared these measurements with the change in expired NO that occurred after serial spirometry alone. We found that ambient NO levels affected mixed expired NO. Controlling for inspired NO, we found that repeated spirometry alone produced a significant fall in mixed expired NO (p < 0.01) that was maximal after 30 min (36.6 +/- 8.5% fall). After allergen and ISH challenges, expired NO was elevated relative to levels after repeated spirometry (p < 0.01 and p = 0.065, respectively). In addition, we found that prechallenge expired NO levels were significantly correlated with the magnitude of the late fall in FEV1 following allergen challenge (r = 0.80, p < 0.01). These data demonstrate that repeated spirometry results in reduced mixed expired NO and suggest that both ISH and allergen-induced bronchoconstriction share pathobiologic mechanisms that produce increases in mixed expired NO.

Measurement of the fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) has been proposed as a noninvasive assessment of asthmatic airway inflammation. The influence of the expiratory flow rate during the collection maneuver on the ability of FENO to discriminate healthy subjects from those with asthma is unknown. We compared online and offline measurement of FENO at different flow rates. FENO was collected with expiratory flows of 50-500 ml/second in 34 patients with asthma (PC(20) of less than 8 mg/ml) and 28 healthy subjects (PC(20) of more than 10 mg/ml) using offline collection techniques. In a subgroup of 18 individuals with asthma and 17 healthy subjects, we additionally measured FENO at multiple expiratory flow rates (47-250 ml/second) using online methods. FENO fell with an increasing expiratory flow rate; FENO was higher in subjects with asthma as compared with healthy subjects at each flow rate studied with both techniques (p0.001). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the diagnosis of asthma indicated that FENO is a robust discriminator between individuals with asthma and healthy subjects (area under the ROC curves 0.79 +/- 0.06 to 0.86 +/- 0.06, p for significant discrimination0.0001). Neither expiratory flow rate nor collection technique (online versus offline) significantly altered this discriminatory capacity (area under the ROC curves = 0.84 +/- 0.07 with the slowest online method versus 0.80 +/- 0.07 with the fastest offline method, p = 0.46). These data indicate that the choice of expiratory flow rate and collection method can be based on practicality and patient comfort without compromising the utility of this test for asthma.

An increased concentration of nitric oxide (NO) in exhaled air (FENO) is now recognized as a critical component of the asthmatic phenotype. When we identified patients with asthma on the basis of a standard case definition alone, we found that they were remarkably heterogeneous with respect to their FENO. However, when we included genotype at a prominent asthma candidate gene (i.e., NOS1) in the case definition, and determined the number of AAT repeats in intron 20, we identified a remarkably homogeneous cohort of patients with respect to FENO. Both mean FENO (p = 0.00008) and variability around the mean (p = 0.000002) were significantly lower in asthmatic individuals with a high number (or = 12) of AAT repeats at this locus than in those with fewer repeats. These data provide a biologically tenable link between genotype at a candidate gene in a region of linkage, NOS1, and an important component of the asthmatic phenotype, FENO. We show that addition of NOS1 genotype to the case definition of asthma allows the identification of a uniform cohort of patients, with respect to FENO, that would have been indistinguishable by other physiologic criteria. Our isolation of this homogeneous cohort of patients ties together the well-established associations among asthma, increased concentrations of NO in the exhaled air of asthmatic individuals, and variations of trinucleotide repeat sequences as identified in several neurologic conditions.

Nitric oxide (NO) is a molecular gas that can be recovered in higher levels from the exhaled gas of subjects with asthma than from subjects without asthma. However, the precise mechanisms responsible of promoting increased fraction of expired nitric oxide (FE(NO)) in asthma are unknown. As leukotriene antagonism has been shown to reduce FE(NO) in patients with asthma, we hypothesized that leukotrienes mediate the increased FE(NO) encountered in this condition. Furthermore, because leukotriene antagonism stabilizes serum eosinophil markers during reductions in inhaled corticosteroid doses, and FE(NO) has been shown to correlate with sputum eosinophils in asthma, we reasoned that the effect of leukotrienes on FE(NO) might be mediated by eosinophils recruited to the airway by leukotrienes. To test this hypothesis, we performed methacholine and leukotriene (LT) E(4) bronchoprovocation challenges in 16 subjects with atopic asthma and measured FE(NO) and sputum differential counts before and after bronchoprovocation. We then compared FE(NO) in the seven subjects who developed increased sputum eosinophils following LTE(4) inhalation with values measured after methacholine inhalation in these seven subjects. Following LTE(4) inhalation, eosinophils rose from 4.01 +/- 0.89% pre-LTE(4) to 8.33 +/- 1.52% post-LTE(4). The mean change in sputum eosinophils from baseline after LTE(4) inhalation was larger than that after methacholine inhalation (+4.31 +/- 1.25% versus -1.14 +/- 0.93%). After LTE(4) inhalation, FE(NO) levels did not differ from prechallenge baseline or from levels following methacholine inhalation (ANOVA p > 0.05). These data indicate that neither LTE(4) nor recruitment of eosinophils into the airway by LTE(4) is a sufficient stimulus to acutely increase FE(NO) in subjects with asthma.