Search

Abstract: This paper presents analyses of recent natioanl survey data on access to medical care. In particular, information on major access indicators and special problems associated with the economic and political climate of the 1980s collected in a 1982 national telephone survey of 6.610 United Scales adults and children, representing some 4.802 families, is compared with previous national stirrers for kef population subgroups--by age. place of residence, income, race, insurance coverage, and type of regular source of care In general, the findings show that favorable progress has been made, but some inequities continue to persist. Some traditionally disadvantaged groups are more likely to have a regular family doctor, private insurance coverage, have been to a doctor, or had certain preventive tests and procedures than was true for them in the past. On the other hand, compared to the more economically and/or socially advantaged groups in 1982, they have still not "caught up" entirely. There also is evidence that they may be hardest hit by the exacerbation of the financial barriers to care thai result from unemployment, inflation, and cutbacks in health program eligibility and benefits that have characterized the decade of the 1980s. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article focuses on the implications of a medical service known as contract or lodge practice to the health insurance in the U.S. In a lodge practice, a medical practitioner agrees to provide medical service to group of patients, such as members of benevolent organizations, fraternal lodges, or employees of industrial companies, for a fixed remuneration per year. It has been noted that this form of medical practice usually leads to substandard applications because some of the physicians provide slipshod services. They are pursuing this service as a means of obtaining a reputation and a clientele. The prevalent practice of these physicians was rooted from the point of view of a practitioner who felt exploited and threatened economically, particularly by the health insurance.

The article reports on the compulsory health insurance in California in 1934-1935. According to health surveys in the 1920s and 1930s, poverty and ill health were closely associated. There is an estimated forty percent of the American people who were not receiving adequate medical care as well as medical physicians who were experiencing financial difficulty. Adoption of health insurance was urged by other groups saying that without some method of spreading the risk of medical costs, the diagnostic and therapeutic value of modern medicine would remain beyond the reach of those who needed care the most.