Search

Purpose: To describe the prevalence and risk factors for cataract in an Australian population aged 40 years and older., Methods: Participants were recruited by a household census and stratified, random cluster sampling to represent residents of Victoria, Australia, aged 40 years and older. The following information was collected: initial visual acuity and best-corrected visual acuity, demographic details, health history, dietary intake of antioxidants, lifetime ocular ultraviolet B exposure, and clinical eye examination, including lens photography. Cortical opacities were measured in sixteenths. Cortical cataract was defined as opacity greater than or equal to 4/16 of pupil circumference. Nuclear opacities were graded according to the Wilmer cataract grading scheme, and cataract was defined as greater than or equal to nuclear standard 2.0 of four standards. The height and width of any posterior subcapsular opacity was measured and recorded. Posterior subcapsular cataract was defined as posterior subcapsular opacity greater than or equal to 1 mm2. The worse eye was selected for analysis. Backward stepwise logistic regression was used to quantify independent risk factors for cataract., Results: A total of 3,271 (83% of eligible) of the urban residents, 403 (90% of eligible) nursing home residents, and 1,473 (92% of eligible) rural residents participated. The urban residents ranged in age from 40 to 98 years (mean, 59 years), and 1,511 (46%) were men. The nursing home residents ranged in age from 46 to 101 years (mean, 82 years), and 85 (21%) were men. The rural residents ranged in age from 40 to 103 years (mean, 60 years), and 701 (47.5%) were men. The overall weighted rate of cortical cataract was 11.3% (95% confidence limits, 9.68%, 13.0%) excluding cataract surgery and 12.1% (95% confidence limits, 10.5%, 13.8%) including cataract surgery. The risk factors for cortical cataract that remained in the multivariate logistic regression model were age, female gender, diabetes duration greater than 5 years, gout duration greater than 10 years, arthritis diagnosis, myopia, use of oral beta-blockers, and increased average annual ocular ultraviolet B exposure. Overall, 12.6% (95% confidence limits, 9.61%, 15.7%) of Victorians aged 40 years and older had nuclear cataract including previous cataract surgery, and 11.6% (95% confidence limits, 8.61%, 14.7%) had nuclear cataract excluding previous cataract surgery. In the urban and rural cohorts, age, female gender, rural residence, brown irides, diabetes diagnosed 5 or more years earlier, myopia, age-related maculopathy, having smoked for greater than 30 years, and an interaction between ocular ultraviolet B exposure and vitamin E were all risk factors for nuclear cataract. The rate of posterior subcapsular cataract excluding previous cataract surgery was 4.08% (95% confidence limits, 3.01%, 5.14%), whereas the overall rate of posterior subcapsular cataract including previous cataract surgery was 4.93% (95% confidence limits, 3.68%, 6.17%) . The independent risk factors for posterior subcapsular cataract in the urban and rural cohorts that remained were age in years, rural location, use of thiazide diuretics, vitamin E intake, and myopia., Conclusions: The expected increase in the prevalence of cataract with the aging of the population highlights the need to plan appropriate medical services and public health interventions for primary and secondary prevention. Many of the identified risk factors for cataract in the population have the potential for being modified through public health interventions.

Purpose: To assess the outcome of cataract surgery in an urban population in southern India., Methods: As part of a population-based cross-sectional epidemiologic study, the Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study, 2,522 people of all ages, including 1,399 individuals 30 years of age or older, from 24 clusters representative of the population of Hyderabad in southern India underwent a detailed interview and ocular evaluation including logarithm of minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity, refraction, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, applanation tonometry, gonioscopy, dilation, cataract grading, aphakia/pseudophakia status, and stereoscopic fundus evaluation. Automated threshold visual fields and slit-lamp and fundus photography were performed when indicated by standardized criteria. Very poor outcome in an eye that had undergone cataract surgery was defined as presenting distance visual acuity worse than 20/200, and poor outcome was defined as visual acuity worse than 20/60 to 20/200., Results: In subjects 50 years of age or older, after adjustment for age and sex distribution, the rate of having had cataract surgery in one or both eyes was 14.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.4% to 17.8%). Of 131 eyes (91 subjects) that had undergone cataract surgery, 28 (21.4%; 95% CI, 14.4% to 28.4%) had very poor outcome and another 40 (30.5%; 95% CI, 22.6% to 38.4%) had poor outcome. The very poor outcome in 20 (71.4%) of 28 eyes and poor outcome in 23 (57.5%) of 40 eyes could be attributed to surgery-related causes or inadequate refractive correction. With multivariate analysis, very poor outcome as a result of surgery-related causes or inadequate refractive correction was more likely to be associated with intracapsular cataract extraction than with extracapsular cataract extraction (odds ratio, 9.34; 95% CI, 2.49 to 35.06) in subjects belonging to the lowest socioeconomic status (odds ratio, 4.92; 95% CI, 1.16 to 20.93) and with date of surgery 3 or fewer years before the survey than with more than 3 years (odds ratio, 4.52; 95% CI, 1.33 to 15.39). Also, very poor or poor outcome as a result of surgery-related causes or inadequate refractive correction was associated with women (odds ratio, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.06 to 6.16)., Conclusions: The very high rate of very poor and poor visual outcome, predominantly as a result of surgery-related causes and inadequate refractive correction, in this urban population of India suggests that more attention is needed to improve the visual outcome of cataract surgery. In order to deal with cataract-related visual impairment in India, as much emphasis on surgical quality, refractive correction, and follow-up care is necessary as on the number of surgeries.

Purpose: To investigate the prevalence and predictors of undercorrected refractive errors in the Victorian population., Methods: In this prospective study, a population-based sample of residents was recruited. The improvement in visual acuity with subjective refraction was assessed. Several individual characteristics were investigated as predictors of undercorrected refractive error., Results: There were 5,615 eligible residents, of which 4,735 (84%) participated in the study (53% were women). In all, 466 participants (10%) had significant undercorrected refractive error leading to an improvement of 1 or more lines of visual acuity with refraction. Age was the most important predisposing factor. The risk of undercorrected refractive error increased by 1.8 times for every decade of life starting at 40 years of age. The next most important factor was the absence of distance refractive correction. These individuals were 6.8 times more at risk compared with those who wore distance spectacles. Other significant predictors of undercorrected refractive error were the presence of cataract and European or Middle Eastern languages spoken at home. People with tertiary education or hypermetropia were less likely to need refractive error improvement. Gender, country of birth, and employment status did not have any statistically significant effect after controlling for confounders., Conclusions: The results of this study disclose people in the community who are more at risk of compromising their vision because of undercorrected refractive errors. A campaign is warranted to alert people that it may be possible to improve their vision.

Purpose: To describe the age-specific and gender-specific rates of blindness and visual impairment in urban adults aged 40 years and older., Methods: A population-based sample of residents was recruited. Presenting and best-corrected distance visual acuities were assessed. Functional near vision was measured at each participant's preferred distance. Visual field examination was performed with a Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA); those unable to perform the field analyzer test attempted a Bjerrum screen or confrontation field., Results: The study population comprised 3,271 residents (83% of eligible) from ages 40 to 98 years; 54% were women. Overall, 56% of the study population wore distance correction; this was significantly lower in men but higher in the older age groups. Age-adjusted rates of blindness were 0.066% in men and 0.170% in women. Vision with current correction improved after refraction by gender and age. Direct age-standardized rates of functional near vision did not vary significantly by gender. Forty-six people had significant visual field loss in their better eye. The proportion of participants with constriction of the visual field to within 20 degrees of fixation was similar for men and women when controlled for age (odds ratio, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.44 to 1.49) but increased significantly with age controlled for gender. Visual field abnormalities were detected in 548 right eyes (17%) and 533 left eyes (16%)., Conclusions: Although overall rates of blindness because of visual acuity loss were relatively low, nearly three times more people had visual impairment because of visual field loss than visual acuity loss. These results highlight the need to target blindness prevention programs to the aging population, with a special emphasis on women.

Purpose: The incidence and correlations of undercorrection were studied for 1 year after excimer laser surgery for myopia or myuopic astigmatism., Methods: A consecutive series of 645 eyes of 440 patients were studied. Eyes were examined preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. The parameters evaluated were visual acuity, refraction, and corneal clarity., Results: Following excimer laser surgery, undercorrection of > or = -1.00 diopters gradually increased from 10% at 1 month to 40% at 12 months. Increasing degree of preoperative myopia was significantly associated with increasing occurrence of undercorrection at 3 months (chi 2 = 17.3, P < .001), 6 months (chi 2 = 53.6, P < .001), and 12 months (chi 2 = 64.8, P < .001). Undercorrection was more common in eyes that had had photorefractive keratectomy than in those that had had photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy (odds ratio, 0.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.25 to 0.60). At 1 year, a loss of 2 or more lines of best-corrected visual acuity was recorded in 38% of undercorrected patients. Loss of 2 or more lines of best-corrected visual acuity was more common in patients undercorrected by -1.00 diopter or more (odds ratio, 8.8; 95% confidence interval, 5.4 to 14.6). No relationship was seen between corneal haze and loss of best-corrected visual acuity. Undercorrection was not associated with age, gender, use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, bandage contact lens wear, or corneal haze. Patients with lower degrees of myopia reached a stable refraction more quickly. At 6 months, 71% were within +/- 0.5 diopter of 1-year refraction. Of 17 patients with undercorrection who were treated with topical corticosteroids, only one patient showed a permanent beneficial change., Conclusion: Occurrence of undercorrection is more common in patients with severe myopia and when simultaneous astigmatic corrections are undertaken.

Unlabelled: To examine prospectively the efficacy and safety of photorefractive keratectomy and photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy., Methods: We treated 645 eyes (440 patients) with a VisX Twenty/Twenty excimer laser and followed them up for 12 months., Results: The percentage of eyes with myopia between -5.01 and -10.00 diopters spherical equivalent within 1 and 2 diopters of emmetropia at 12 months was 65% (123 of 189) and 90% (170 of 189), respectively, whereas the corresponding percentages for eyes with myopia greater than -10.00 diopters spherical equivalent were 39% (16 of 41) and 56% (23 of 41), and for eyes with myopia of -5.00 diopters spherical equivalent or less, 87% (238 of 273) and 99% (270 of 273), respectively. Uncorrected visual acuity of 20/20 and 20/40 or better at 12 months was attained in 47% (129 of 273) and 87% (237 of 273) of the eyes with myopia -5.00 diopters spherical equivalent or less, respectively. At 12 months, 48 (25%) of the 189 eyes with myopia between -5.01 and -10.00 diopters spherical equivalent had uncorrected visual acuity of 6/6 or better and 135 (71%), 6/12. At 12 months, one eye (2%) with myopia greater than -10.00 diopters spherical equivalent had uncorrected visual acuity of 6/6 and 11 (27%) of 41 eyes, 6/12. Ten (4%) of the 273 eyes with myopia of -5.00 diopters spherical equivalent or less, 15 (8%) of the 189 eyes with myopia between -5.01 and -10.00 diopters spherical equivalent, and nine (22%) of the 41 eyes with myopia greater than -10.00 diopters spherical equivalent had lost two or more LogMAR lines of best-corrected visual acuity at 12 months., Conclusion: Excimer laser surgery is highly reliable for myopia of -5.00 diopters spherical equivalent or less and is less reliable for greater myopia.

Purpose: To determine the risk factors for undercorrection of myopia after photorefractive keratectomy and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of retreatment., Methods: A VISX Twenty/Twenty excimer laser was used to treat myopia and myopic astigmatism of up to -15.00 diopters (spherical equivalent) at the corneal plane. Retreatments were performed primarily for undercorrection with or without coexistent corneal haze or abnormalities on videokeratoscopy. Not every patient who was undercorrected requested retreatment., Results: Of 645 eyes (440 patients) followed up for more than 12 months, 58 eyes (9%) required retreatment. The retreatment rate increased with increasing myopia: 17 (5%) eyes with myopia of less than -5.00 diopters, 30 (13%) eyes with myopia of -5.01 to -10.00 diopters, and 11 (19%) eyes with myopia of greater than -10.00 diopters required a second procedure. A higher retreatment rate was observed after astigmatic corrections than after spherical corrections. Corneal haze after retreatment was no greater than that observed after initial procedures. Twelve months after primary procedures, 378 (75%) of 504 eyes were within 1.00 diopter of emmetropia, whereas 27 (69%) of 39 eyes attained this result after retreatment. A total of 383 (76%) of 504 eyes attained uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better after primary procedures, compared with 25 (64%) of 39 eyes after retreatment., Conclusions: The risk of undercorrection requiring retreatment after photorefractive keratectomy increases with the magnitude of the primary treatment. Although less successful than initial procedures, retreatment appears to enhance the results of photorefractive keratectomy.