Search

OBJECTIVES: Platelets play an important role in the pathophysiologic mechanisms of preeclampsia. Our purpose was to investigate by means of flow cytometry to what extent platelets circulate in an activated state during normal pregnancy and whether this activation is more extensive in preeclampsia. STUDY DESIGN: Platelets in whole blood from 10 preeclamptic third-trimester pregnant women (highest diastolic blood pressure range 100 to 130 mm Hg, proteinuria range 0.59 to 11.5 gm/24 hr) and from 10 normotensive third-trimester pregnant controls were analyzed with the following activation markers: anti-P-selectin (α-granule secretion), anti-CD63 (lysosomal secretion), PAC-1 (monoclonal antibody against fibrinogen receptor conformation of the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa complex), anti-platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1, and annexin-V (a placental protein that binds to negatively charged phospholipids, present on the outside of the platelet plasma membrane after activation). The differences in surface antigen exposure between the two groups were determined by double-label flow cytometry. Flow cytometric data were analyzed in two ways: first, the percentages of activated platelets above a certain threshold compared with a nonpregnant control sample were determined, indicative for activation of a subpopulation of cells, and, second, the mean fluorescence intensities were determined, indicative of the mean surface antigen expression of the total platelet population. RESULTS: Analysis of the percentage of activated platelets proved most informative. With this analysis an enhanced platelet activation status was present in 4 of 10 normotensive patients and a more extensive platelet activation status in all 10 preeclamptic patients, as indicated by P-selectin ( p = 0.008) and CD63 ( p = 0.03) expression. Increased platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 ( p = 0.005) expression was also observed in preeclampsia. CONCLUSIONS: Flow cytometric analysis clearly indicated that platelets circulate in a more extensively activated state during preeclampsia than during normal pregnancy. The increased platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 expression in preeclamptic patients demonstrates that, besides α-granular and lysosomal release, other hitherto unknown mechanisms are involved. Platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 appears to be the best marker to distinguish preeclamptic patients from normotensive pregnant women. Only a subpopulation of the platelets appears to be activated. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;176:461-9.)

Objectives: An increased platelet activation status is present in patients with preeclampsia. Our purpose was (1) to establish by means of flow cytometry whether platelets circulate in an activated state during the first and second trimesters of pregnancy and (2) to establish whether early platelet activation predicts the onset of preeclampsia. Study design: Consecutively, 244 pregnant women were included in a prospective study design. Platelets in whole blood samples from the pregnant women in the first trimester, the second trimester, and after delivery were labeled with the following antibodies associated with platelet activation: anti-CD62P (P-selectin, α-granule secretion), anti-CD63 (GP53, lysosomal secretion), anti-CD31 (GPIIa′, platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1). The surface antigen exposure was determined by double-label flow cytometry with anti-CD42b (GPIb, a platelet-specific monoclonal glycoprotein) to select platelets and platelet-derived materials. Preeclampsia was defined as a diastolic blood pressure G90 mm Hg and proteinuria G0.3 gm in a 24-hour urine sample (International Society for Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy criteria). Results: Seventeen of 244 patients had preeclampsia (6.9%). Only first-trimester CD63 expression had an area under the curve >0.5 by receiver-operator characteristic curve analysis and was selected as a possible predictor of preeclampsia. We found a sensitivity of 47% and a specificity of 76% with use of a percentage of activated platelets above 2% as a positive test. Likelihood ratios were 1.94 for positive likelihood and 0.69 for negative likelihood. Univariate logistic regression analysis results were odds ratio 2.8 (95% confidence interval 1.0 to 7.6). Multivariate logistic regression analysis results were odds ratio 2.9 (95% confidence interval 0.92 to 8.9). However, the odds ratio of first antenatal diastolic blood pressure was two to four times higher than the odds ratio of first-trimester CD63 expression. The combination of first-trimester CD63 and first antenatal diastolic blood pressure increases the positive likelihood ratio from 1.94 to 9.4, with a sensitivity of 41%, a specificity of 96%, and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.62. Conclusions: Increased first-trimester CD63 expression is an independent risk factor for development of preeclampsia. CD63 expression might be useful to identify a subgroup of patients with a high risk for development of preeclampsia, especially in combination with first-trimester antenatal diastolic blood pressure. This method of patient selection may enable more efficient intervention studies in patients at risk than do the selection methods used so far. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177:434-42.)