1. Introduction of a Mobile Adverse Event Reporting System Is Associated With Participation in Adverse Event Reporting
- Author
-
Daniel S. Rubin, Avery Tung, Sharon Jakubczyk, Colin Pesyna, and Chuanhong Liao
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Retrospective review ,Wilcoxon signed-rank test ,business.industry ,030503 health policy & services ,Health Policy ,Mobile Applications ,03 medical and health sciences ,Patient safety ,Adverse Event Reporting System ,0302 clinical medicine ,Emergency medicine ,medicine ,Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems ,Humans ,Anesthesia ,030212 general & internal medicine ,0305 other medical science ,business ,Adverse effect ,Program Evaluation ,Retrospective Studies - Abstract
Physicians underutilize adverse event reporting systems. Web-based platforms have increased participation; thus, it was hypothesized that a mobile application would increase adverse event reporting. The authors developed a mobile reporting application for iOS and Android operating systems and performed a retrospective review on reporting rates by clinicians in the Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care. Monthly reporting rates were calculated for the intervention year and for the 2 prior years (2013-2016). The Wilcoxon rank sum test and χ2 test were used to evaluate significance. Overall monthly reporting rates for all clinicians were 15.3 ± 7 for the first time period, 17.3 ± 6 for the second time period, and 27.9 ± 7 for the third time period ( P = .0035). The majority of reports in the third time period were submitted using the mobile application (193/337, 57%, P = .026). Deployment of a mobile application reduced barriers to adverse event reporting and increased monthly reporting rates for all clinicians.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF