1. Randomized, Double Blind Controlled Trial of Subcutaneous Recombinant Human Interleukin-11 Versus Prednisolone in Active Crohn's Disease.
- Author
-
Klaus R. Herrlinger, Thomas Witthoeft, Andreas Raedler, Bernd Bokemeyer, Thomas Krummenerl, Jorg-Dieter Schulzke, Norbert Boerner, Bruno Kueppers, Joerg Emmrich, Axel Mescheder, Ulrich Schwertschlag, Mark Shapiro, and Eduard F. Stange
- Subjects
- *
INTERLEUKINS , *GROWTH factors , *CROHN'S disease , *INFLAMMATORY bowel diseases , *INTESTINAL diseases , *PLACEBOS - Abstract
BACKGROUND: Interleukin-11 has shown benefit in animal inflammatory bowel disease models. Recently, recombinant human interleukin-11 (rhIL-11) has been observed to induce remission in a subset of patients with mild to moderate Crohn's disease (CD). The present study compared the efficacy of rhIL-11 versus prednisolone in remission induction in CD. METHODS: Patients with active CD were randomly assigned to receive either subcutaneous rhIL-11 (1 mg once weekly) and prednisolone placebo tablets, or active prednisolone (60 mg/day) and rhIL-11 placebo, for 12 weeks. Prednisolone/placebo was tapered after week 1, and patients were assessed every second week. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients received medication: 13/27 (rhIL-11) and 17/24 (prednisolone) completed 12 weeks of treatment. Remission rates (intent to treat) for rhIL-11 versus prednisolone were 4% versus 46% at week 4 ( p < 0.001) and 19% versus 50% at week 6 ( p < 0.05). Response to treatment (ΔCDAI > 100) was seen in 19% (rhIL-11) versus 63% (prednisolone) after 4 weeks ( p < 0.002) and 37% versus 63% after 6 weeks ( p= 0.1). After 12 weeks of treatment, it was observed that 22% (rhIL-11) versus 21% (prednisolone) had remained in remission. Frequent side effects of rhIL-11 included fever (n = 3), rash (4), arthralgia/arthritis (3), nausea/vomiting (3), and headache (6). CONCLUSION: rhIL-11 is well tolerated but significantly inferior when compared to prednisolone in short-term remission induction in patients with active CD. In this patient cohort, both treatments appeared to be poor in maintaining remission over a period of 3 months. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2006
- Full Text
- View/download PDF