Search

Children with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may respond differently to COVID-19 immunization as compared with healthy children or adults with IBD. Those younger than 12 years receive a lower vaccine dose than adults. We sought to describe the safety and humoral immune response to COVID-19 vaccine in children with IBD.We recruited children with IBD, ages 5-17 years, who received ≥ 2 doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine by a direct-to-patient outreach and at select sites. Patient demographics, IBD characteristics, medication use, and vaccine adverse events were collected. A subset of participants had quantitative measurement of anti-receptor binding domain IgG antibodies after 2-part immunization.Our study population included 280 participants. Only 1 participant required an ED visit or hospitalization because of an adverse event. Of 99 participants who underwent anti-receptor binding domain IgG antibody measurement, 98 had a detectable antibody, with a mean antibody level of 43.0 μg/mL (SD 67) and a median of 22 μg/mL (interquartile range 12-38). In adjusted analyses, older age ( P = 0.028) and antitumor necrosis factor monotherapy compared with immunomodulators alone ( P = 0.005) were associated with a decreased antibody level. Antibody response in patients treated with antitumor necrosis factor combination vs monotherapy was numerically lower but not significant.Humoral immune response to COVID-19 immunization in children with IBD was robust, despite a high proportion of this pediatric cohort being treated with immunosuppressive agents. Severe vaccine-related AEs were rare. Overall, these findings provide a high level of reassurance that pediatric patients with IBD respond well and safely to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

OBJECTIVES: In 2015, the Selecting Therapeutic Targets in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (STRIDE) program proposed shifting the therapeutic focus on ulcerative colitis (UC) toward altering the natural history of the disease course by regularly monitoring objective measurements of disease activity and tailoring treatment accordingly. The therapeutic paradigm shift was well received in the research community and is often cited. However, new evidence on optimal UC treatment targets continues to accumulate since the time of the STRIDE guidelines. This systematic review summarizes the evidence accrued since the STRIDE UC recommendations, discusses the barriers for adoption of treat-to-target approaches in clinical practice in UC, and suggests directions for future research. METHODS: We systematically reviewed MEDLINE for studies from the time of the STRIDE systematic review up to March 31, 2018, that assessed the potential treatment targets identified by the STRIDE recommendations. RESULTS: Each potential treatment target literature search returned > 200 articles, which were then reviewed by 2 independent investigators for relevant studies. Selected studies of clinical factors, patient-reported outcomes, endoscopy, histology, imaging, and biomarkers and implications on treatment targets are summarized. CONCLUSIONS: It appears that the relative weight given to different therapeutic targets in the development and improvement of UC treatments could be optimized, with an increased emphasis on endoscopic and histological targets over clinical or symptomatic targets. For this evolution to occur, however, new research has to demonstrate that the treat-to-target approach will deliver on the promise of better long-term outcomes compared with current approaches.

Prior studies suggest that medication exposures may be associated with new onset inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The aim of this study was to determine the effect of statins on the risk of new onset IBD in a large United States health claims database.We conducted a retrospective matched case-control study with a national medical claims and pharmacy database from Source Healthcare Analytics LLC. We included any patient aged 18 or older with ICD-9 code 555.x for Crohn's disease (CD) or 556.x for ulcerative colitis (UC) between January 2008 and December 2012. IBD patients diagnosed in 2012 were compared with the age group, gender, race, and geographically matched controls. Controls had no ICD-9 codes for CD, UC, or IBD-associated diseases and no prescriptions for IBD-related medications. New onset IBD patients were defined as having at least three separate CD or UC ICD-9 codes and no IBD-related ICD-9 or prescription before first IBD ICD-9. Statin exposure was assessed by Uniform System of Classification level 5 code. To account for diagnostic delay, exposures within 6 months of first ICD-9 were excluded. Exposures within 12 and 24 months were excluded in sensitivity analyses. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for new onset IBD, CD, and UC.A total of 9,617 cases and 46,665 controls were included in the analysis. Any statin exposure was associated with a significantly decreased risk of IBD (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.64-0.72), CD (0.64, 95% CI 0.59-0.71), and UC (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.65-0.76). This effect was similar for most specific statins and regardless of intensity of therapy. The protective effect against new onset CD was strongest among older patients. Statins' association with a lower risk of IBD was similar after adjusting for antibiotics, hormone replacement therapy, oral contraceptives, comorbidities, and cardiovascular medications.Statins may have a protective effect against new onset IBD, CD, and UC. This decreased risk is similar across most statins and appears to be stronger among older patients, particularly in CD.

Corrigendum: Statins Associated with Decreased Risk of New Onset Inflammatory Bowel Disease