Search

A woman's reproductive history influences her risk of breast cancer. The authors hypothesized that reproductive history also influences stage of disease at the time of diagnosis. The authors analyzed a population-based cohort of 1.5 million Danish women born between 1935 and 1978 for whom individual information on births was available. Between 1978 and 1994, 10,790 incident cases of breast cancer in women under 60 years of age were identified. Nulliparous women compared with parous women and women with a late age at first birth compared with an early age were at significantly increased risk of being diagnosed with a large tumor and with cancer that had spread to regional lymph nodes. However, such an association was not seen for women diagnosed with a small tumor and women with cancer that had not spread to regional lymph nodes. Reproductive history did not appear to influence the time interval from first symptoms to first physician visit (“patient delay”) or the time interval from first physician visit to surgery (“doctor delay”). The authors conclude that reproductive history is associated both with incidence of breast cancer and with stage of the disease at diagnosis, indicating possible influences on tumor progression and growth rate. Intensified awareness is warranted to achieve earlier diagnosis among nulliparous women and women with a late age at first childbirth, with the hope of improving their prognosis. Am J Epidemiol 1999; 150: 1325-30. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

In many countries, the male: female ratio at birth has varied significantly over the past century, but the reasons for these changes have been unclear. The authors observed a close parallel between decreasing family size and declining male: female sex ratio in Denmark from 1960 to 1994. To explain this finding, they examined the sex ratio and birth order of 1,403,021 children born to 700,030 couples. Overall, 51.2% of the first births were male. However, families with boys were significantly more likely than expected to have another boy (biologic heterogeneity). By the fourth birth to families with three prior boys, 52.4% were male. The increase varied directly with the number of prior boys (p for trend = 0.0007). Furthermore, couples with boys were more likely to continue to have children. In summary, the authors found that the declining male: female ratio in Denmark and probably other European populations is mainly attributable to three effects: declining family size, biologic heterogeneity, and child sex preference. Why families with boys are more likely to have additional boys is unknown. Am J Epidemiol 1999;150:957-62. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

If birth defects resulting from fusion failure in the midline have a common etiology, as previously hypothesized, persons with a family history of 1 type of midline defect should have an increased risk of dissimilar midline defects. The authors examined this hypothesis by linking information from the National Patient Register, the Causes of Death Register, and the Danish Family Relations Database for all Danish residents registered in the Civil Registration System during 1977–2005. Linkage yielded a cohort of 1.7 million persons with 1 or more relatives, including 9,063 persons with 1 or more midline defects. The authors investigated familial clustering of midline defects by estimating relative risks of similar and dissimilar midline defects according to family history of midline defects. Given a history of similar defects in first-degree relatives, relative risks for neural tube defects, conotruncal defects, oral facial clefts, anal/rectal defects, and diaphragmatic defects were 8.2 (95% confidence interval (CI): 3.1, 21.7), 7.7 (95% CI: 4.3, 13.8), 13.2 (95% CI: 10.8, 16.2), 10.3 (95% CI: 2.6, 41.1), and 11.2 (95% CI: 1.6, 79.7), respectively. However, given a dissimilar defect in a family member, the relative risk for any midline defect was null. Thus, similar defects but not dissimilar defects clustered in families, providing no evidence of a shared etiology for dissimilar midline defects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A response by Tine Westergaard et al. to a letter to the editor about their article "Sibship Characteristics and Risk of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma" is presented.