Search

Few biomarker-based validation studies have examined error in online self-report dietary assessment instruments, and food records (FRs) have been considered less than food frequency questionnaires (FFQs) and 24-hour recalls (24HRs). We investigated measurement error in online and paper-based FFQs, online 24HRs, and paper-based FRs in 3 samples drawn primarily from 3 cohorts, comprising 1,393 women and 1,455 men aged 45–86 years. Data collection occurred from January 2011 to October 2013. Attenuation factors and correlation coefficients between reported and true usual intake for energy, protein, sodium, potassium, and respective densities were estimated using recovery biomarkers. Across studies, average attenuation factors for energy were 0.07, 0.07, and 0.19 for a single FFQ, 24HR, and FR, respectively. Correlation coefficients for energy were 0.24, 0.23, and 0.40, respectively. Excluding energy, the average attenuation factors across nutrients and studies were 0.22 for a single FFQ, 0.22 for a single 24HR, and 0.51 for a single FR. Corresponding correlation coefficients were 0.31, 0.34, and 0.53, respectively. For densities (nutrient expressed relative to energy), the average attenuation factors across studies were 0.37, 0.17, and 0.50, respectively. The findings support prior research suggesting different instruments have unique strengths that should be leveraged in epidemiologic research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Medication use is often underreported in paper-based questionnaires or interviews.Web-based questionnaires may improve recall ofmedication use, but data on their validity are currently lacking. Participants in the Pregnancy and Infant Development (PRIDE) Study (2014-2016; n = 557) and the Pregnancy Drug Registry (pREGnant) (2015-2016; n = 169) completed a 6-week paper-based medication diary during gestational weeks 19-24 or 26-31. In week 34, they completed a Web-based questionnaire with questions on medication names, time period and frequency of use, and quantity taken. To assess the degree of underreporting, we calculated the questionnaire's sensitivity using the medication diary as the reference standard. Sensitivity was high formany medication groups, including antiepilepticmedication (sensitivity (Sn) = 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.89, 1.00), antacids (Sn = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.86, 0.93), and iron preparations (Sn = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.64, 0.98). However, medications for short-term use were underreported more frequently, with sensitivities of 0.54 (95% CI: 0.35, 0.72) for antihistamines, 0.63 (95% CI: 0.57, 0.69) for analgesic and antipyretic agents, and 0.57 (95% CI: 0.51, 0.64) for acetaminophen. Shortening the period of time between exposure and questionnaire administration increased sensitivity substantially. In conclusion, underreporting in Web-based questionnaires is limited for many medication groups. In prospective studies, underreporting of medications for short-term usemay be reduced by decreasing the interval between consecutive questionnaires. medication use; pregnancy; Pregnancy Drug Registry (pREGnant); Pregnancy and Infant Development (PRIDE) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To date, Web-based 24-hour recalls have not been validated using objective biomarkers. From 2006 to 2009, the validity of 6 Web-based DietDay 24-hour recalls was tested among 115 black and 118 white healthy adults from Los Angeles, California, by using the doubly labeled water method, and the results were compared with the results of the Diet History Questionnaire, a food frequency questionnaire developed by the National Cancer Institute. The authors performed repeated measurements in a subset of 53 subjects approximately 6 months later to estimate the stability of the doubly labeled water measurement. The attenuation factors for the DietDay recall were 0.30 for blacks and 0.26 for whites. For the Diet History Questionnaire, the attenuation factors were 0.15 and 0.17 for blacks and whites, respectively. Adjusted correlations between true energy intake and the recalls were 0.50 and 0.47 for blacks and whites, respectively, for the DietDay recall. For the Diet History Questionnaire, they were 0.34 and 0.36 for blacks and whites, respectively. The rate of underreporting of more than 30% of calories was lower with the recalls than with the questionnaire (25% and 41% vs. 34% and 52% for blacks and whites, respectively). These findings suggest that Web-based DietDay dietary recalls offer an inexpensive and widely accessible dietary assessment alternative, the validity of which is equally strong among black and white adults. The validity of the Web-administered recall was superior to that of the paper food frequency questionnaire. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]