Search

Introduction: When an injured patient arrives in the Emergency Department (ED), timely and appropriate care is crucial. Shock Index Pediatric Age-Adjusted (SIPA) has been shown to accurately identify pediatric patients in need of emergency interventions. However, no study has evaluated SIPA against age-adjusted tachycardia (AT). This study aims to compare SIPA with AT in predicting outcomes such as mortality, severe injury, and the need for emergent intervention in pediatric trauma patients., Material and Methods: This is a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of patient data abstracted from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program Participant Use Files (TQIP PUFs) for years 2013-2020. Patients aged 4-16 with blunt mechanism of injury and injury severity score (ISS) > 15 were included. 36,517 children met this criteria. Sensitivity, specificity, overtriage, and undertriage rates were calculated to compare the effectiveness of AT and elevated SIPA as predictors of severe injuries and need for emergent intervention. Emergent interventions included craniotomy, endotracheal intubation, thoracotomy, laparotomy, or chest tube placement within 24 h of arrival., Results: AT classified 59% of patients as "high risk," while elevated SIPA identified 26%. Compared to AT patients, a greater proportion of patients with elevated SIPA required a blood transfusion within 24 h (22% vs. 12%, respectively; p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality was higher for the elevated SIPA group than AT (10% vs. 5%, respectively; p < 0.001) as well as the need for emergent operative interventions (43% vs. 32% respectively; p < 0.001). Grade 3 or higher liver/spleen lacerations requiring blood transfusion were also more common among elevated SIPA patients than AT patients (8% vs. 4%, respectively; p < 0.001). AT demonstrated greater sensitivity but lower specificity compared to SIPA across all outcomes. AT showed improved overtriage and undertriage rates compared to SIPA, but this is attributed to identifying a large proportion of the sample as "high risk.", Conclusions: AT outperforms SIPA in sensitivity for mortality, injury severity and emergent interventions in pediatric trauma patients while the specificity of SIPA is high across these outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no financial interests to disclose related to this manuscript., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Computed tomography of the abdomen (CT) is used as the gold standard for detecting solid organ injuries (SOI) after blunt abdominal trauma (BAT). However, patient selection for CT is still controversial due to its potential risks. In this study, we aimed to investigate the usefulness of laboratory tests in the detection or exclusion of SOI in pediatric patients evaluated in the emergency department due to BAT., Methods: The study was planned as a prospective, observational study and was conducted in the emergency department of a university hospital between February 2018 and February 2019. Patients under the age of 18 who were evaluated for BAT in the emergency department were included in the study. In the study, the diagnostic value of abnormal laboratory tests in detecting SOI was calculated by accepting CT results as the gold standard., Results: Of the 323 patients included in the study, 118 (36%) were male. There were 283 patients who underwent CT. SOI was detected in 18 (6%) patients. Abnormal alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, amylase and lipase tests were found to be statistically significant in predicting SOI (p < 0.05). However, none of the tests were found to have sufficient sensitivity and specificity. Hemoglobin, hematocrit, lactate and base excess values were not found to be statistically significant in predicting SOI (p > 0.005)., Conclusions: The hematologic laboratory tests are insufficient to rule out solid organ injury in pediatric patient with BAT., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare they have no competing interests and no potential financial conflicts., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The effectiveness of current assessment tools for cervical fracture are mixed with respect to elderly patients. We aim to examine utility of history and physical exam to assess for cervical fracture for elderly patients suffering a ground-level fall., Methods: Retrospective cohort from a tertiary-care ED for patients ≥65 years, including dementia, after ground-level fall. Logistic regression was used to examine predictability of various clinical factors. Neurologic deficits were considered a hard sign for imaging and were not assessed., Results: Of 1035 patient encounters analyzed, 683 had CT cervical-spine (C-spine) imaging (66.0%) and 16 (1.5%) had cervical fracture. C-spine tenderness (OR 4.7, 95% CI 1.5-14.1), neck pain (OR 10.5, 95% CI 3.4-32.5), altered mental status (AMS) (OR 5.1, 95% CI 1.7-15.6), and external trauma above the clavicles (ETC) (OR 3.8, 95% CI 1.2-12.3) predicted cervical fracture. C-spine tenderness and neck pain were collinear and run-in separate models. Dementia (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.4-0.9) did not predict cervical fracture in this population. A combination of ETC, C-spine tenderness, and AMS had a sensitivity = 100% and specificity = 40.0% for detection of cervical fracture. ETC was found in all but two fractures requiring intervention with negative predictive value = 99.3%., Conclusions: Clinical assessment for elderly patients without neurologic signs, together with the absence of ETC, cervical tenderness, and AMS may be reliable in ruling out cervical fracture after a ground-level fall, including patients with history of dementia. Fractures requiring intervention were rare in patients without ETC. However, findings are retrospective and prospective validation is required., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest JRW reports no conflict of interest. AJM reports no conflict of interest. JES reports no conflict of interest. AWC reports no conflict of interest. MAW reports no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Pre-existing medical conditions (PEC) represent a unique domain of risk among older trauma patients. The study objective was to develop a metric to quantify PEC burden for trauma patients., Methods: A cohort of 4526 non-severe blunt-injured trauma patients aged 55 years and older admitted to a Level I trauma center between January 2006 and December 2012 were divided into development (80%) and test (20%) sets. Cox regression was used to develop the model based on in-hospital and 90-day mortality. Regression coefficients were converted into a point-based PEC Risk Score. Performance of the PEC Risk Score was compared in the test set with two other PEC-based metrics and three injury-based metrics. An external cohort of 2284 trauma patients admitted in 2013 was used to evaluate combined metric performance., Results: Total mortality was 9.4% and 9.1% in the development and test set, respectively. The final model included 12 PEC. In the test set, the PEC Risk Score (c-statistic: 79.7) was superior for predicting in-hospital and 90-day mortality compared with all other metrics. For in-hospital mortality alone, the PEC Risk Score similarly outperformed all other metrics. Combination of the PEC Risk Score and any injury-based metric significantly improved prediction compared with any injury-based metric alone., Conclusion: Our 12-item PEC Risk Score performed well compared with other metrics, suggesting that the classification of trauma-related mortality risk may be improved through its use. Among non-severely injured older trauma patients, the utility of prognostic metrics may be enhanced through the incorporation of comorbidities., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Computed tomography (CT) is frequently used to identify intra-abdominal injuries in children with blunt abdominal trauma (BAT). The Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) proposed a prediction rule to identify children with BAT who are at very low risk for clinically-important intra-abdominal injuries (CIIAI) in whom CT can be avoided., Objective: To determine the sensitivity of this prediction rule in identifying patients at very low risk for CIIAI in our pediatric trauma registry., Methods: Retrospective review of our institutional trauma registry to identify patients with CIIAI. CIIAI included cases resulting in death, therapeutic intervention at laparotomy, angiographic embolization of intra-abdominal arterial bleeding, blood transfusion for intra-abdominal hemorrhage, and administration of intravenous fluids for two or more nights for pancreatic or gastrointestinal injuries. Patients were identified using ICD diagnosis and procedure codes. Kappa was calculated to evaluate inter-reviewer agreement., Results: Of 5743 patients, 133 (2.3%) had CIIAI. 60% were male and the mean age was 8 (SD 4.4) years. One patient with CIIAI met the proposed very low risk criteria, resulting in a prediction rule sensitivity of 99%, 95% CI [96-100%]. This patient also had extra-abdominal arterial bleeding requiring revascularization, offering an alternative reason for transfusion. Kappa was 0.85, 95% CI [0.82, 0.89], indicating strong inter-rater agreement., Conclusions: One out of 133 patients with CIIAI met very low risk criteria based on the PECARN prediction rule. This study supports the PECARN clinical prediction rule in decreasing CT use in pediatric patients at very low risk for CIIAI., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The diagnostic accuracy of the FAST exam performed by EM residents were shown to be similar to radiology residents. However, in the last 2 decades, an extended-FAST (E-FAST) protocol including thoracic examination to exclude pneumo- and hemothorax was introduced. The accuracy of emergency physicians (EPs) while performing E-FAST is a less studied area, especially in Europe. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the E-FAST exam performed by EM residents with the results of CT scan as a gold standard., Methods: This was a prospective, observational, diagnostic accuracy study conducted at the ED of a Level 1 Trauma Center. All consecutive adult multiple trauma patients were eligible, and any patient in whom thoraco-abdominal CT was ordered were recruited. Unstable and unavailable patients were excluded. E-FAST examination was performed by EPs as the index test, and CT examinations reported by a blinded academic radiology faculty was the gold standard., Results: A total of 140 patients were recruited from eligible 144 patients. The final study population was 132 for abdominal and 130 for thorax examinations. In this study, AUC of E-FAST was 0.71 for abdominal free fluid, 0.87 for pneumothorax and 1.00 for pleural effusion. The sensitivity was 42.9% and specificity was 98.4%. The +LR for abdominal free fluid was 26.8 and -LR was 0.58., Conclusion: E-FAST examination has an excellent specificity. However, the sensitivity of the test is not high enough to rule-out thoraco-abdominal injuries in trauma patients when performed by EPs., (Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Blunt chest trauma can cause not only damage to the thoracic cage, but can also injure intracardiac structures including the papillary muscles, chordae tendineae, and valve leaflets. Aortic valve (AV) injury secondary to blunt chest trauma is a rare occurrence. Clinically, AV injury may be missed during the initial post-trauma assessment due to the lack of suspicion of cardiac involvement. Thus, the diagnosis of AV injury is often delayed or missed for a time interval of days to months. As a consequence, the traumatic AV regurgitation can rapidly or progressively lead to congestive heart failure unless surgically corrected. Therefore, emergency physicians should be aware of the possibility of intracardiac structure injury, such as valvular injuries, after blunt chest trauma. Guidelines for the appropriate use of bedside cardiac ultrasound (BCU) recommend BCU should be performed in all patients with new murmurs for clinically significant valvular lesions that could potentially change management. We described the case of a 73-year-old female patient with AV injury after blunt trauma. She experienced cardiac arrest (CA) secondary to a moderate-to-severe traumatic AR, which was successfully treated with emergency AV replacement. We discuss how to diagnose and manage a CA patient, aided by BCU, with ventricular failure associated with persistent AV regurgitation. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report on CA associated with isolated rupture of bicuspid AV rupture and AV regurgitation secondary to blunt chest trauma because of the lack of early suspicion of AV injury., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Axillary artery injuries can be associated with both proximal humeral fractures (Naouli et al., 2016; Ng et al., 2016) [1,2] as well as shoulder dislocations (Leclerc et al., 2017; Karnes et al., 2016) [3,4]. We report a rare case of an isolated axillary artery truncation following blunt trauma without any associated fracture or dislocation., Case Report: A 58-year-old male presented to the emergency department for evaluation after falling on his outstretched right arm. The patient was found to have an absent right radial pulse with decreased sensation to the right arm. Point of care ultrasound showed findings suspicious for traumatic axillary artery injury, and X-rays did not demonstrate any fracture. Computed tomography with angiography confirmed axillary artery truncation with active extravasation. The patient underwent successful vascular repair with an axillary artery bypass. Although extremity injuries are common in emergency departments, emergency physicians need to recognize the risk for vascular injuries, even without associated fracture or dislocation., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: In adult patients with blunt trauma, severe mechanism of injury leads to routine pan-computed tomography (CT). Due to concerns about the risk of radiation, we sought to determine whether clinical suspicion could identify children requiring radiographic imaging., Methods: A prospective study was conducted in a pediatric emergency department of a Level 1 trauma center. Patients ≤14years presenting with blunt trauma due to predefined severe mechanisms were eligible. Physicians recorded their suspicions for clinically significant injury (CSI). Imaging was obtained at the physician's discretion. CSI was defined as injury requiring intervention or hospital admission ≥24h. Both admitted and discharged patients were contacted ≥2weeks after presentation to document undetected injuries., Results: 837 patients were eligible; 753 were enrolled. 159 patients were excluded because the mechanism did not meet severity criteria. Follow-up was completed for 529/594 remaining patients. Physicians were suspicious of all injuries in 71/75 patients with CSI and had no suspicions in 382/454 without CSI. The 75 injured patients had 153 CSIs; positive suspicion of CSI was recorded for 149 injuries. The four patients who sustained unsuspected injuries had multiple other suspected injuries. Of the 594 patients, 42 received focused CT and 14 underwent pan-CT. No patient had previously undetected injuries on follow-up., Conclusion: In our study, clinical suspicion was able to identify children with CSI. If further studies support our findings, using clinical suspicion rather than mechanism alone to guide radiographic imaging may avoid unnecessary radiation exposure., (Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: To determine the location of intraperitoneal free fluid on FAST exam in pediatric patients undergoing evaluation for trauma., Methods: Retrospective review of all FAST exams positive for intraperitoneal free fluid performed in patients sustaining trauma between August 2009 and February 2016 in an urban pediatric emergency department. Positive results were categorized into one of nine potential intraperitoneal locations; 4 each in the right and left upper quadrants, and the pelvis., Results: One hundred and three complete positive studies were reviewed. The median age of patients was 10years (IQR 7-14) with 66% being male. Ninety-five percent had fluid present in the pelvis, 35% had fluid present in the RUQ, and 16.5% had fluid present in the LUQ. Overall, the most frequent location of fluid outside of the pelvis was found at the inferior tip of the liver, present in 83.3% of patients with fluid in the RUQ and 29% of all patients with a positive FAST., Conclusions: The majority of pediatric trauma patients with a positive FAST exam will exhibit free fluid in the pelvis. Particular attention should be directed to the inferior tip of the liver in children as this represents the most common location for fluid collection outside the pelvis., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Blunt traumatic diaphragmatic injury (BTDI) is an uncommon injury and one which is difficult to diagnose. The objective of this study was to identify features associated with this injury., Methods: This was a retrospective study based on records of 354307 blunt trauma victims treated between 1998 and 2013 collected by the Israeli National Trauma Registry., Results: BTDI was reported in 231 (0.065%) patients. Motor vehicle accidents were responsible for 84.4% of the injuries: 97 (42.0%) were reported as drivers; 54 (23.4%) were passengers; 34 (14.7%) were pedestrians hit by cars; and 10 (4.3%) were on motorcycles. There were more males than females (2.5:1) compared with blunt trauma patients without BTDI (p<.001). Patients with BTDI were significantly younger than blunt trauma patients without BTDI (p<.001). ISS was 9-14 in 5.2%, 16-24 in 16.9%, 25-75 in 77.9%. Urgent surgery was performed in 62% of the patients and 79.7% had surgery within 24h of admission. Mortality was 26.8%. Over 40% of patients with BTDI had associated rib, pelvic and/or extremity injuries. Over 30% had associated spleen, liver and/or lung injuries. Nevertheless, less than 1% of patients with skeletal injuries and less than 2.5% with solid organ injuries overall had associated BTDI. Despite hollow viscus injury being less prevalent, up to 6% of patients with this injury had associated BTDI., Conclusions: BTDI is infrequent following blunt trauma. Hollow viscus injuries were more predictive of BTDI than skeletal or solid organ injuries., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Permanent neurologic injury in pediatric patients with burner and stinger syndrome (BSS) is unlikely. This study aims to assess the feasibility of clinical observation without extensive radiologic workup in this selective population., Methods: A retrospective study was conducted of patients aged younger than 18 years evaluated at a level I trauma center from 2012 to 2014. Patients were grouped according to positive deficit (PD) or negative deficit (ND) upon physical examination. Demographics, clinical findings, and outcomes were analyzed., Results: Thirty patients (ND, n = 14; PD, n = 16) were evaluated for BSS, most often as a result of injurious football tackle. Age and length of stay were similar between groups. Injury Severity Score was lower in the ND group than the PD group (1.6 ± 1.2 vs 3.8 ± 3.1, respectively; P< .05). Cervical computed tomography was performed on 11 patients (78.6%) in the ND group and 15 patients (93.8%) in the PD group at considerable added cost, with only 1 positive result in the ND group and none in the PD group. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed 2 positive findings in each group, and no surgical interventions were indicated. Ten ND (71.4%) and 12 PD (75%) patients reported complete resolution of symptoms at discharge (P> .05)., Conclusions: Children presenting with BSS experience temporary symptoms that resolve without surgical intervention. Magnetic resonance imaging identified more injuries than computed tomographic imaging; therefore, we suggest that management for BSS should include observation, serial neurologic examinations, and MRI evaluation as appropriate., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) clinical decision rule is extremely sensitive for clearance of cervical spine (C-spine) injury in blunt trauma patients with distracting injuries., Objectives: We sought to determine whether the NEXUS criteria would maintain sensitivity for blunt trauma patients when femur fractures were not considered a distracting injury and an absolute indication for diagnostic imaging., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed blunt trauma patients with at least 1 femur fracture who presented to our emergency department as trauma activations from 2009 to 2011 and underwent C-spine injury evaluation. Presence of C-spine injury requiring surgical intervention was evaluated., Results: Of 566 trauma patients included, 77 (13.6%) were younger than 18 years. Cervical spine injury was diagnosed in 53 (9.4%) of 566. A total of 241 patients (42.6%) had positive NEXUS findings in addition to distracting injury; 51 (21.2%) of these had C-spine injuries. Of 325 patients (57.4%) with femur fractures who were otherwise NEXUS negative, only 2 (0.6%) had C-spine injuries (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2%-2.2%); both were stable and required no operative intervention. Use of NEXUS criteria, excluding femur fracture as an indication for imaging, detected all significant injuries with a sensitivity for any C-spine injury of 96.2% (95% CI, 85.9%-99.3%) and negative predictive value of 99.4% (95% CI, 97.6%-99.9%)., Conclusions: In our patient population, all significant C-spine injuries were identified by NEXUS criteria without considering the femur fracture a distracting injury and indication for computed tomographic imaging. Reconsidering femur fracture in this context may decrease radiation exposure and health care expenditure with little risk of missed diagnoses., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Coronary artery dissection and aneurysm culminating in acute myocardial infarction are rare after blunt chest trauma. We are reporting a case of a previously healthy 52-year-old man who presented with right inferior lobe contusion, pleural effusion, right interlobar fissure effusion, bone fracture of right fourth rib, and acute inferior wall myocardial infarction and who experienced blunt trauma in his right chest wall by an airbag deployment in a car accident. Coronary angiography showed an aneurysm in the middle of right coronary artery with 70% afferent narrowing just distal to the aneurysm with no visible atherosclerotic lesion. A 4.0×20 mm TEXUS Liberté stent in the lesion was deployed, and a good coronary flow was obtained without residual stenosis and the aneurysm vanished.

Background: The differential diagnosis for a paratracheal air collection includes Zenker diverticulum, tracheal diverticulum, apical herniation of the lung, and pneumomediastinum. In the setting of trauma, pneumomediastinum is traditionally regarded as an alarm sign that warrants investigation for tracheal or esophageal rupture,both highly morbid conditions., Case Report: A patient presented to the emergency department with neck pain several hours after being involved in a low-speed,side-impact automobile collision. She was discharged with analgesics after cervical spine radiographs showed no fracture and physical examination found no neurological deficits. She returned 18 days later with retrosternal pain and worsening neck pain, and cervical computed tomographic scan demonstrated an abnormal paratracheal air collection. Follow-up chest computed tomographic scan identified a right-sided tracheal diverticulum without evidence of pneumomediastinum.

The focused assessment with sonography for trauma examination has assumed the role of initial screening examination for the presence or absence of hemoperitoneum in the patient with blunt abdominal trauma. Sonographic pitfalls associated with the examination have primarily been related to mistaking contained fluid collections with hemoperitoneum. We present a case in which an elongated left lobe of the liver was misdiagnosed as a splenic subcapsular hematoma. It is imperative that emergency physicians and trauma surgeons be familiar with this normal variant of the liver and its associated sonographic appearance on the perisplenic window in order to prevent nontherapeutic laparotomies or embolizations.

A small truck collided with a 67-year-old female pedestrian. She sustained blunt, closed trauma to her right knee, and developed a prepatellar Morel-Lavallée lesion (MLL). A MLL is a closed soft tissue degloving injury, resulting from high-energy shearing forces, which separate the skin and subcutaneous tissue from the underlying fascia. The resultant space collects fluid and is prone to infection, tissue necrosis, and symptoms of ongoing mass effects. The diagnosis is elusive because of its rarity and often subtle initial symptoms. Prompt diagnosis is critical, given the potentially severe complications when missed, and less invasive and more successful treatment when found early. Most reported cases are proximal to the pelvis, whereas the few reported peri–knee MLLs involve young athletes or postsurgical complications. To our knowledge, this is the third reported case of a non–sport-related MLL of the knee, all of which involved high-inertia force to the knee. Therefore, MLL of the knee should be considered in patients with knee trauma, particularly in the setting of pedestrians struck by motor vehicles.

A 42-year-old man noted decreased urine output and visited our emergency department. He said that 3 days previously, he had gotten drunk and fallen down a set of stairs. Blood tests and abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed no abnormalities. A serum creatinine level of 5.89 mg/dL led to a diagnosis of acute renal failure and his hospitalization. After admission, his ascitic fluid level gradually increased, suggesting urine leakage into the peritoneal cavity. Microscopic examination of his ascitic fluid sediment revealed the presence of hyaline casts enclosing renal tubular epithelial cells. Cystography demonstrated contrast medium leakage into the peritoneal cavity, which led to a diagnosis of bladder rupture. Examination of ascitic fluid sediment is simple and very useful for diagnosing bladder rupture.

Traumatic dissection of the aorta is a well-documented entity with poor prognosis and broad spectrum of clinical presentations. We report a rare case of an asymptomatic late presentation of aortic dissection after a high-speed vehicle accident. This case highlights the importance of high clinical suspicion for the diagnosis of aortic dissection., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Delayed diagnosis of blunt traumatic diaphragmatic rupture (BDR) is not uncommon in the emergency department (ED) despite improvement in investigative techniques. We reviewed a large case series of patients diagnosed with blunt traumatic diaphragmatic rupture in order to report demographics, clinical features, and mechanisms of injury of this important but challenging entity., Methods: From January 2001 through December 2009, 43 patients were diagnosed with BDR at Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Demographic data, including sex, age, initial hemodynamic parameters, laboratory data, diagnostic imaging, trauma mechanism, injury location, associated injuries, injury severity score (ISS), time to diagnosis, intensive care unit length of stay (ICU LOS), hospital length of stay (hospital LOS), and mortality, were extracted from hospital records., Results: A total of 43 patients (34 men; 9 women) with BDR were analyzed. Their median age was 37 years (15-82 yrs). Most of these injuries were related to traffic collision (76.8%). The anatomic location of injury to the diaphragm consisted of 24 left-sided (55.8%), 14 right-sided (32.6%),and 5 bilateral diaphragmatic injuries. (11.6%) Hemopneumothorax was the most common associated injury (37.2%). The median diagnostic time was 8 hours (range 2 to 366 hrs). The median ISS score was 18 (range 9 to 41). The median ICU LOS was 4 days (range 0 to 99 ds) and the median HLOS was 19 days (range 1 to 106ds). The total mortality rate was 9.3%. Initial high ISS, initial shock and bilateral diaphragmatic injury significantly increased mortality., Conclusion: BDR constitutes a rare entity in thoracoabdominal trauma and most of these injuries were related to traffic collision. High index of suspicion was still the main factor to early diagnosis of this case. The mortality was related to initial shock , bilateral BDR and high ISS. Proper initial resuscitation and correction of other serious injuries may be more life-saving in patients with BDR., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: With recent advances in radiologic diagnostic procedures, the use of diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) has markedly declined. In this study, we reviewed data to reevaluate the role of DPL in the diagnosis of hollow organ perforation in patients with blunt abdominal trauma., Methods: Adult patients who had sustained blunt abdominal trauma and who were hemodynamically stable after initial resuscitation underwent an abdominal computed tomographic (CT) scan. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage was performed for patients who were indicated to receive nonoperative management and where hollow organ perforation could not be ruled out., Results: During a 60-month period, 64 patients who had received abdominal CT scanning underwent DPL. Nineteen patients were diagnosed as having a positive DPL based on cell count ratio of 1 or higher. There were 4 patients who sustained small bowel perforation. The sensitivity and specificity of the cell count ratio for a hollow organ perforation in this study were 100% and 75%, respectively. No missed hollow organ perforations were detected., Conclusion: For patients with blunt abdominal trauma and hemoperitoneum who plan to receive nonoperative management, DPL is still a useful tool to exclude hollow organ perforation that is undetected by CT., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Radiology plays an important role in evaluation of a trauma patient. Although chest radiography is recommended for initial evaluation of the trauma patient by the Advanced Trauma Life Support course, we hypothesized that precise physical examinations and history taking accurately identify those blunt trauma patients at low risk for chest injury, making routine radiographs unnecessary. Thus, this study was performed to investigate the role of chest radiography in initial evaluation of those trauma patients with normal physical examination., Methods: In this prospective cross-sectional study, all the hemodynamically stable blunt trauma patients with negative physical examination result referred to our trauma center during a 4-month period (March-June 2009) were included. Chest radiographies were performed and reviewed for abnormalities., Results: During the study period, 5091 blunt trauma patients referred to our center, out of which, 1008 were hemodynamically stable and had negative physical examination result. Only 1 (0.1%) patient had abnormal chest radiography that showed perihilar lymphadenopathy, unrelated to trauma., Conclusion: Performing routine chest radiography in stable blunt trauma patients is of low clinical value. Thus, decision making for performing chest radiography in blunt trauma patients based on clinical findings would be efficacious and resource saving., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Traumatic diaphragma ruptures (DRs) are an unusual condition after blunt thoracoabdominal trauma, and there are some difficulties in the diagnosis, in the absence of the additional life-threatening injuries. Right-sided injuries are less frequent than left-sided injuries and may be missed easily. Intrathoracic herniation of abdominal organs is an uncommon condition for right-sided DR. Particularly, to our knowledge, progressive hepatothorax and enterothorax that develop over years are a very rare presentation of DR. Herein, we present a case of progressive thoracic herniation of the abdominal organs, diagnosed 22 years after the initial trauma.

Objective: The addition of spiral computed tomography (SCT) to bedside assessment in patients with major trauma may improve detection of significant injury. We hypothesized that in high-acuity trauma patients, emergency physicians' ability to detect significant injuries based solely on bedside assessment would lack the sensitivity needed to exclude serious injuries when compared with SCT., Methods: This was a prospective single-cohort study of high-acuity trauma patients routinely undergoing whole-body SCT at a level 1 trauma center from January to September 2006. Before SCT, emergency physicians assigned ratings for likelihood of injury to 5 body regions on the basis of bedside assessment. These ratings were compared with final SCT interpretations., Results: We enrolled 400 patients as a convenience sample; 71 were excluded. When a "very low" rating was considered negative and "low," "intermediate," "high," and "very high" were considered positive, emergency physicians were able to detect head, cervical spine, chest, abdominal/pelvic, and thoracic/lumbar spine injuries with sensitivities (95% confidence interval) of 100% (98.6%-100%), 97.4% (94.9%-98.8%), 96.9% (94.2%-98.4%), 97.9% (95.5%-99.1%), and 97.0% (94.3%-98.5%), respectively. For overall diagnostic accuracy, areas under the receiver operating characteristics curve (95% confidence interval) were 0.87 (0.82-0.92), 0.71 (0.62-0.81), 0.81 (0.76-0.86), 0.77(0.71-0.83), 0.74 (0.65-0.84), respectively., Conclusions: Bedside assessment by emergency physicians before SCT was sensitive in ruling out serious injuries in high-acuity trauma patients with a "very low" rating for injury. However, overall diagnostic accuracy was low, suggesting that SCT should be considered in most high-acuity patients to prevent missing injuries., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: It is sometimes difficult to decide whether to perform abdominal computed tomographic (CT) scans for possible liver laceration in patients who have sustained less severe or minor blunt abdominal trauma. This study was conducted to find out whether the basic laboratory workup could provide information of possible liver laceration in blunt abdominal trauma patients and act as an indication for CT scans., Methods: In this retrospective case-control study, we included 289 patients who had sustained blunt abdominal injury for which they received abdominal CT scans in our emergency department. Of the 289 patients, the study group (n = 42) included patients who had been found to have liver lacerations after obtaining the CT; the controls (n = 42) were those not found to have such injuries by the same method with matching of age and sex., Results: In patients with blunt abdominal injuries, there is a strong difference in liver laceration between elevation of white blood cell (WBC) counts (P = .001), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (P < .001), and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (P < .001). A logistic regression model demonstrated that WBC count and AST were independently associated with liver laceration. With elevations of serum AST greater than 100 IU/L, ALT greater than 80 IU/L, and WBC count greater than 10 000/mm(3), we found a sensitivity and specificity of 90.0% and 92.3%, respectively, in the 42 liver laceration victims., Conclusion: In patients with blunt abdominal trauma, elevated WBC counts together with elevated AST and ALT are strongly associated with liver laceration and warrant further imaging studies and management., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Blunt abdominal trauma is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among all age groups. A multiplicity of diagnostic modalities exists to evaluate the abdomen. We sought to assess the diagnostic performance of base deficit (BD) in identifying intra-abdominal injury in patients with blunt abdominal trauma., Methods: A prospective, nonrandomized series of patients with blunt abdominal trauma admitted into the 2 emergency departments was investigated from September 2007 to September 2008. Arterial blood samples were analyzed. According to BD, the patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1 who had a BD of -6 or lower and group 2 who had a BD more than -6. Ultrasonography, computed tomographic scan, or laparotomy was performed to find intra-abdominal injury. Follow-up at 7 days by telephone interview was obtained on patients who were discharged., Results: A total of 400 patients were enrolled, with a mean (SD) age of 34.8 ± 17.1 years. Two hundred sixty-eight (67%) of them were male. Seventy-six (19%) of patients had a BD of -6 or lower. Sixty-eight (17%) of them showed to have intra-abdominal injury with a BD of approximately -8.7 ± 3.2, compared with patients without intra-abdominal injury, -0.4 ± 0.1. Patients with a BD of -6 or lower achieved more laparotomy and blood transfusion compared with patients with a BD more than -6. On receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the cutoff point of -6 was obtained with sensitivity and specificity of 88.2% and 95.2% and with positive and negative predictive values of 79% and 97.5%, respectively. None of outpatients had abdominal problem in telephone follow-up., Conclusions: These data show that the BD is an early available important indicator to identify intra-abdominal injury in patients with blunt abdominal trauma, as well as a high transfusion requirement., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Traumatic pancreatic rupture is associated with high morbidity and mortality. The diagnosis is difficult and usually accompanied with other injuries. We reported a 17-year-old adolescent boy who experienced this disease alone. The diagnosis was first suspected in ultrasonography and then confirmed by computed tomography. Endoscopic retrograde pancreatography showed his pancreatic duct was patent. He made an uneventful recovery after 10 days of hospitalization. Ultrasonography is well known for detecting the presence of hemoperitoneum in blunt abdominal trauma. Furthermore, it can be applied to the assessment of patients with posttraumatic abdominal pain. It provides a real-time, noninvasive, and inexpensive means for screening this kind of patients.

Subperiosteal hematoma arises usually after blunt trauma to the bone. It is due to disinsertion or rupture of a muscle tendon or injury of nutrient artery of bone. Subperiosteal hematoma is a rare condition and develops mainly in the orbit because the periosteum is more loosely attached to the bone. Thus, few cases of subperiosteal hematoma in iliac bone are reported. Traumatic pseudoaneurysm develops mainly after penetrating or blunt trauma. It can be easily diagnosed by intravenous contrast computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging by seen extravasation of contrast dye. We present a case of subperiosteal hematoma with subperiosteal pseudoaneurysm after blunt pelvic trauma in a 17-year-old adolescent boy. The pseudoaneurysm arose from a branch of superior gluteal artery, but it was not seen in the initial contrast computed tomography scan.

Splenic injuries are often caused when snowboarders thrust their abdomens with their own left elbows after falling and hitting the ground. We report 10 snowboarders who suffered a splenic injury by accidentally thrusting their own elbow against their abdomen upon falling to the ground. Clinical presentation, postural analysis, and treatment are described. In an attempt to break the force while falling, snowboarders assumed 1 of 2 defensive postures that subsequently induced splenic injury: falling with an outstretched hand or falling with folded arms placed closely to the chest, that is, the fetal tuck posture. Snowboarders who fell in the outstretched hand posture developed more severe symptoms than those who fell in the fetal tuck posture. Herein, we discuss the mechanisms of such snowboarding-related splenic injury in detail and provide a review of the literature.

Purpose: Currently, nonoperative management is the procedure of choice for solid organ injury in patients with a blunt abdominal trauma. Missed blunt bowel and mesenteric injuries (BBMIs) are possible because diagnosis is difficult. The aim of our study was to test a new algorithm for BBMI diagnosis using abdominal ultrasonography (AUS), computed tomography (CT), and diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL)., Methods: We reviewed cases of blunt abdominal injuries over a 10-year period, then we designed an algorithm that was prospectively tested in hemodynamically stable patients over a 2-year period. An abnormal AUS led to helical CT. When the CT showed more than 2 findings suggestive of BBMI, laparotomy was performed. In case of 1 or 2 abnormal CT findings, we performed a DPL and calculated the ratio of white blood cells (WBCs) to red blood cells (RBCs) (WBC/RBC ratio) in the lavage fluid and divided this by the WBC/RBC ratio in peripheral blood. A ratio of 1 or higher was considered positive for BBMI, and a laparotomy was immediately performed. Patients with a ratio of less than 1 were managed nonoperatively., Results: In the retrospective study, 26 (1%) of 2126 patients admitted to our trauma center for blunt trauma had a BBMI, including 15 (58%) diagnosed after a median delay of 24 hours. In the prospective study, 531 patients were admitted for blunt trauma with multiple injuries, including 131 with abdominal trauma. Computed tomography was performed in 40 patients. There were 2 criteria or more of BBMI in 1 patient, 0 criteria in 27 patients (with an uneventful follow-up), and 1 or 2 criteria in 12 patients who had DPL with a median ratio of 0.82 (ranges, 0.03-9). Five patients had a ratio of 1 or higher. They underwent immediate laparotomy. In all 5 cases, BBMI was found. The 7 patients who had a ratio of less than 1 were observed in ICU and treated for extra-abdominal injuries. No BBMI injury was missed in these patients. The accuracy of the algorithm was 100% (95% confidence interval, 0.99-1.00)., Conclusion: The proposed algorithm (based on AUS, CT, and DPL) had a high accuracy to diagnose BBMI while requiring the performance of DPL in only a few (2%) patients.

Study Objectives: The digital rectal examination (DRE) may assist physicians in detecting spinal cord injury in patients with blunt trauma. However, the test characteristics of the DRE for detecting spinal cord injury are unknown., Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of consecutive adult patients with blunt trauma over a 2-year period. The DRE result was compared with the presence or absence of spinal cord injury at discharge., Results: A total of 1032 adult patients with blunt trauma had a DRE. Of these, 54 (5.2%) had diagnoses consistent with spinal cord injury. Ninety-nine patients had decreased rectal tone, 27 of whom also had spinal cord injuries. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values were 50%, 93%, 27%, and 97%, respectively., Conclusion: The DRE is insensitive to spinal cord injury and has a poor positive predictive value. The high specificity must be balanced against the large number of false-positive results.

Objective: The aim of this study was to estimate the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) of computed tomography (CT) without oral contrast for diaphragm injuries (DIs) in blunt abdominal trauma., Methods: We prospectively enrolled 500 consecutive "trauma-one" patients who received CT imaging and interpretation (CT-Read1) of the abdomen within 45 minutes of their arrival from July 2000 to December 2001. All patients were imaged without oral contrast but with intravenous contrast. Computed tomographic images were reviewed within 24 hours of admission by research radiologists (CT-Read2) blinded to CT-Read1. True DIs were determined hierarchically by either laparotomy or autopsy., Results: There were 9 patients with laparotomy or autopsy-proven blunt DIs; 8 of these injuries involved the left hemidiaphragm. The CT-Read1 correctly detected only 6 of 9 blunt DIs, thus missing 3 DIs. One of these involved the right hemidiaphragm, whereas the other 2 were left sided. There were no false-positive findings with CT-Read1 for blunt DI. The sensitivity and specificity of CT imaging with respect to DI were 66.7% (95% CI, 29.9%-92.5%) and 100% (95% CI, 99.2%-100%), respectively. The PPV for the test was 1.00 (95% CI, 0.65-1.00)., Conclusion: Although the low number of blunt DIs in this study limits its general applicability, CT imaging of the diaphragm without oral contrast appears to perform within the range of reported imaging techniques using oral contrast. Still, CT scanning appears to have an unsatisfactorily low sensitivity to be reliably used in eliminating the diagnosis of blunt DI.

The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of intraperitoneal fluid (IF) in blunt trauma patients with intra-abdominal injuries, to determine the rate of exploratory laparotomy in patients with and without IF, and to identify the location of this IF. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 604 patients with intra-abdominal injuries after blunt trauma who were admitted to a level 1 trauma center over a 42-month period. Patients were considered to have intra-abdominal injuries if an injury to the spleen, liver, urinary tract, pancreas, adrenal glands, gallbladder, or gastrointestinal tract was identified on abdominal computed tomography (CT) or at exploratory laparotomy. Patients were considered to have IF if fluid was identified on abdominal CT or during exploratory laparotomy. In patients undergoing abdominal CT or abdominal ultrasound (US), the specific location of the IF was identified. Four hundred forty-three (73%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 69 - 77%) of the 604 patients with intra-abdominal injuries had IF. Patients with IF had an increased risk of laparotomy (344/443 [78%] v 44/161 [27%], odds ratio = 9.2, 95% CI 6.1-13.9). Of the 539 patients undergoing abdominal CT or abdominal US, IF was identified in 389 (72%) and was visualized in the following locations: 258 of 389 (66%) in Morison's pouch, 216 of 389 (56%) in the left upper quadrant, 187 of 389 (48%) in the pelvis, and 139 of 390 (36%) in paracolic gutters. Three patients with IF visualized solely in the paracolic gutters underwent laparotomy. The majority of patients with intra-abdominal injuries have IF, and these patients are more likely to undergo laparotomy. Morison's pouch is the most common location for IF to be detected with radiologic imaging. However, visualization of the paracolic gutters with abdominal US may detect IF in patients with intra-abdominal injuries that would otherwise not be detected by US., (Copyright 2002, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.))

Computed tomography has had a questionable role in diagnosing blunt aortic injury (BAI). The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of helical computed tomography of the thorax (HCTT) for detection of BAI. Trauma Registry data and medical records were reviewed for 2,854 patients admitted over a 32-month period. A total of 243 patients were identified at risk for BAI. Patients were evaluated for BAI because of chest radiograph, physical examination, or clinical suspicion. Eleven of 2,834 patients sustained BAI. Of 243 patients who sustained blunt torso trauma, 232 patients underwent HCTT. Eleven underwent aortography without HCTT. Sixteen patients had an abnormal HCTT, revealing 9 patients with BAI. No delayed BAI were encountered. HCTT effectively screens for BAI. Aortography can be more specifically applied as a diagnostic study when preceded by HCTT. HCTT should not be used as solitary study for BAI as some injuries identified by HCTT do not represent BAI., (Copyright 2002, Elsevier Science (USA).)

Classic teaching suggests that blunt thoracic aortic rupture (BTAR) results from high-speed deceleration injury mechanisms. Our recent experience with a patient who sustained fatal aortic rupture resulting from a low-speed crushing injury emphasizes the importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion for BTAR, even in patients with "low-risk" injury mechanisms. Several potential pathophysiologic mechanisms of BTAR are discussed.