Search

Introduction: Out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients are often transported to the closest emergency department (ED) or cardiac center for initial stabilization and may be transferred for further care. We investigated the effects of delay to transfer on in hospital mortality at a receiving facility.Methods: We included OHCA patients transported from the ED by a single critical care transport service to a quaternary care facility between 2010 and 2018. We calculated dwell time as time from arrest to critical care transport team contact. We abstracted demographics, arrest characteristics, and interventions started prior to transport arrival. For the primary analysis, we used logistic regression to determine the association of dwell time and in-hospital mortality. As secondary outcomes we investigated for associations of dwell time and mortality within 24 h of arrival, proximate cause of death among decedents, arterial pH and lactate on arrival, sum of worst SOFA subscales within 24 h of arrival, and rearrest during interfacility transport.Results: We included 572 OHCA patients transported from an outside ED to our facility. Median dwell time was 113 (IQR = 85-159) minutes. Measured in 30 min epochs, increasing dwell time was not associated with in-hospital mortality, 24-h mortality, cause of death and initial pH, but was associated with lower 24-h SOFA score (p = 0.01) and lower initial lactate (p = 0.03). Rearrest during transport was rare (n = 29, 5%). Dwell time was associated with lower probability of rearrest during transport (OR = 0.847, (95% CI 0.68-1.01), p = 0.07).Conclusions: Dwell time was not associated with in-hospital mortality. Rapid transport may be associated with risk of rearrest. Prospective data are needed to clarify optimal patient stabilization and transport strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: HEART score is widely used to stratify patients with chest pain in the emergency department but has never been validated for cocaine-associated chest pain (CACP). We sought to evaluate the performance of HEART score in risk stratifying patients with CACP compared to an age- and sex-matched cohort with non-CACP.Methods: The parent study was an observational cohort study that enrolled consecutive patients with chest pain. We identified patients with CACP and age/sex matched them to patients with non-CACP in 1:2 fashion. HEART score was calculated retrospectively from charts. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) within 30 days of indexed encounter.Results: We included 156 patients with CACP and 312 age-and sex-matched patients with non-CACP (n = 468, mean age 51 ± 9, 22% females). There was no difference in rate of MACE between the groups (17.9% vs. 15.7%, p = 0.54). Compared to the non-CACP group, the HEART score had lower classification performance in those with CACP (AUC = 0.68 [0.56-0.80] vs. 0.84 [0.78-0.90], p = 0.022). In CACP group, Troponin score had the highest discriminatory value (AUC = 0.72 [0.60-0.85]) and Risk factors score had the lowest (AUC = 0.47 [0.34-0.59]). In patients deemed low-risk by the HEART score, those with CACP were more likely to experience MACE (14% vs. 4%, OR = 3.7 [1.3-10.7], p = 0.016).Conclusion: In patients with CACP, HEART score performs poorly in stratifying risk and is not recommended as a rule out tool to identify those at low risk of MACE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Emergency medical services (EMS) response volume has been linked to weather and temporal factors in a regional EMS system. We aimed to identify if models of EMS utilization incorporating these data are generalizable through geographically disparate areas in the United States.Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of EMS dispatch data from four regions: New York City, San Francisco, Cincinnati, and Marin County for years 2016-2019. For each model, we used local weather data summarized from the prior 6 h into hourly bins. Our outcome for each model was EMS dispatches as count data. We fit and optimized a negative binomial regression model for each region, to estimate incidence rate ratios. We compared findings to a prior study performed in Western Pennsylvania.Results: We included 5,940,637 EMS dispatches from New York City, 809,405 from San Francisco, 260,412 from Cincinnati, and 77,461 from Marin County. Models demonstrated consistency with the Western Pennsylvania model with respect to temperature, season, wind speed, dew point, and time of day; both in terms of direction and effect size when expressed as incidence rate ratios. Precipitation was associated with increasing dispatches in the New York City, Cincinnati, and Marin County models, but not the San Francisco model.Conclusion: With minor differences, regional models demonstrated consistent associations between dispatches and time and weather variables. Findings demonstrate the generalizability of associations between these variables with respect to EMS use. Weather and temporal factors should be considered in predictive modeling to optimize EMS staffing and resource allocation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic may affect both use of 9-1-1 systems and prehospital treatment and transport practices. We evaluated EMS responses in an EMS region when it experienced low to moderate burden of COVID-19 disease to assess overall trends, response and management characteristics, and non-transport rates. Our goal is to inform current and future pandemic response in similar regions.Methods: We performed a retrospective review of prehospital EMS responses from 22 urban, suburban, and rural EMS agencies in Western Pennsylvania. To account for seasonal variation, we compared demographic, response, and management characteristics for the 2-month period of March 15 to May 15, 2020 with the corresponding 2-month periods in 2016-2019. We then tested for an association between study period (pandemic vs historical control) and incidence of non-transport in unadjusted and adjusted regression. Finally, we described the continuous trends in responses and non-transports that occurred during the year before and initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic from January 1, 2019 to May 31, 2020.Results: Among 103,607 EMS responses in the 2-month comparative periods of March 15 to May 15, 2016-2020, we found a 26.5% [95% CI 26.9%, 27.1%] decrease in responses in 2020 compared to the same months from the four prior years. There was a small increase in respiratory cases (0.6% [95%CI 0.1%, 1.1%]) and greater frequency of abnormal vital signs suggesting a sicker patient cohort. There was a relative increase (46.6%) in non-transports between periods. The pandemic period was independently associated with an increase in non-transport (adjusted OR 1.68; 95%CI 1.59, 1.78). Among 177,194 EMS responses occurring in the year before and during the early period of the pandemic, between January 1, 2019, and May 31, 2020, we identified a 31% decrease in responses and a 48% relative increase in non-transports for April 2020 compared to the previous year's monthly averages.Conclusion: Despite a low to moderate burden of infection during the initial period of the COVID-19 pandemic, we found a decline in overall EMS response volumes and an increase in the rate of non-transports independent of patient demographics and other response characteristics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Many of the clinical risk scores routinely used for chest pain assessment have not been validated in patients at high risk for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We performed an independent comparison of HEART, TIMI, GRACE, FRISC, and PURSUIT scores for identifying chest pain due to ACS and for predicting 30-day death or re-infarction in patients arriving through Emergency Medical Services (EMS).Methods and Results: We enrolled consecutive EMS patients evaluated for chest pain at three emergency departments. A reviewer blinded to outcome data retrospectively reviewed patient charts to compute each risk score. The primary outcome was ACS diagnosed during the primary admission, and the secondary outcome was death or re-infarction within 30-days of initial presentation. Our sample included 750 patients (aged 59 ± 17 years, 42% female), of whom 115 (15.3%) had ACS and 33 (4.4%) had 30-day death or re-infarction. The c-statistics of HEART, TIMI, GRACE, FRISC, and PURSUIT for identifying ACS were 0.87, 0.86, 0.73, 0.84, and 0.79, respectively, and for predicting 30-day death or re-infarction were 0.70, 0.73, 0.72, 0.72, and 0.62, respectively. Sensitivity/negative predictive value of HEART ≥ 4 and TIMI ≥ 3 for ACS detection were 0.94/0.98 and 0.87/0.97, respectively.Conclusions: In chest pain patients admitted through EMS, HEART and TIMI outperform other scores for identifying chest pain due to ACS. Although both have similar negative predictive value, HEART has better sensitivity and lower rate of false negative results, thus it can be used preferentially over TIMI in the initial triage of this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]