1. Simultaneous Multiple Journal Submissions: The Case Against.
- Author
-
Pressman, Steven
- Subjects
MANUSCRIPTS ,SCHOLARLY periodicals ,SCHOLARLY publishing ,PERIODICAL publishing ,PUBLISHING ,DECISION making - Abstract
The article argues against simultaneous submission of the same manuscript to several scholarly journals. Journal Publications also serve as a primary measure of the relative ranking of economics department and as such help to determine the reputation of economics department and programs at different schools. Another line of criticism has been directed at the decision making processes that journals employ. Specifically, journals have been faulted for discriminating against women and individuals from less prestigious institutions. Such discrimination may take the form of higher rejection rates, fewer requests to revise and resubmit papers, or slower response rates from editors. Journal referees have been biased against empirical results that do not conform to their theoretical perspective. Multiple submissions would also lead to quicker acceptances through elimination of "rejection waiting time" having to wait for one rejection before being able to send a paper to another journal. Under any multiple submission policy a journal would presumably accept a paper and then allow the author a certain period within which to agree to have the paper published in that journal.
- Published
- 1994
- Full Text
- View/download PDF