Search

Background: APOE e4 genotype is known to be a risk factor for Alzheimer's disease and atherosclerosis. Recently, published evidence has shown that APOE e4 genotype may also be associated with the cessation of cigarette smoking. Objectives: The aim of this retrospective analysis was to explore whether any past smoking outcomes differed based on APOE e4 genotype in a large national dataset. Methods: Data were extracted from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center's longitudinal Uniform Data Set study. We limited this retrospective baseline analysis to the normal cognition ( n = 2995) and mild cognitive impairment ( n = 1627) groups that had APOE genotype and smoking data. Because this was an exploratory retrospective analysis, we conducted descriptive analyses on all variables based on APOE e4 genotype. We controlled for demographic, clinical, medication and neurocognitive data in the analyses. Results: In both the normal cognition group and the mild cognitive impairment group, e4 carriers and e4 non-carriers did not significantly differ on total years smoked, age when last smoked and the average # of packs/day smoked during the years they smoked. In both groups, e4 carriers and e4 non-carriers differed on various neurocognitive measures. Conclusion: These data do not support the recently published evidence of the association between APOE e4 genotype and smoking outcomes. Scientific Significance: Larger prospective clinical trials are needed to further explore the relationship between APOE genotype and smoking outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In a random assignment study, substance-abusing patients with HIV/AIDS in a public general hospital received a brief contact condition or received 12 months of case management delivered by paraprofessionals. Patient outcomes included substance use, HIV transmission risk, physical health, psychological status, and quality of living situation. In both conditions, a significant decrease occurred in a range of problems from Intake to the 6-month interview, followed by no significant pattern of change at 12- and 18-month interviews. On major outcome variables, there were no significant differences between the brief contact and case management conditions. Sixteen percent had died by the 18-month interview. Process data indicated wide variation in the amount of case management received by participants, and the amount of case management was not related to improvement in the outcome measures. The study has limitations yet does not support the hypothesis that case management improves outcomes better than brief contact for this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]